[Peace-discuss] [OccupyCU] More local censorship

Fri Sep 7 17:09:43 UTC 2012

I detect that you are O'bashing, Chris.

"My name is Fraud.  Sigmoid Fraud, at your service."

On 9/8/2012 12:45 AM, Chris Goodrow wrote:
> http://change.gov/agenda/ethics_agenda/
>
> *"Protect Whistleblowers:* Often the best source of information about 
> waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government 
> employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such 
> acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and 
> often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. 
> We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and 
> partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower 
> laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of 
> authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies 
> expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and 
> whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process. "
>
> Chris Goodrow
> (217) 898-5039
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:43:08 +0800
> From: ewj at pigsqq.org
> To: c_goodrow at hotmail.com
> CC: cge at shout.net; yaaqovz at gmail.com; 
> peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net; sf-core at yahoogroups.com; 
> occupycu at lists.chambana.net
> Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] [OccupyCU] More local censorship
>
> The Obama Administration says that it isn't just fulfilling the office.
> Mr. Obama is "making a difference".
>
>
> Glenn Greenwald reports:
>
>     Obama campaign brags about its whistleblower persecutions
>     Excuse me if I don't join in Democrats' sycophantic cheerleading
>     for an Obama presidency that has shredded laws and liberties
>     http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/05/obama-campaign-brags-about-whistleblower-persecutions
>
>     Democrats will spend the week raucously applauding the violence
>     and killing continuously unleashed by their strong, tough,
>     resolute Democratic president – whom they'll hail as their
>     "commander-in-chief" whom we're so blessed to be led by, even
>     though most of them are not in the military and therefore, by
>     definition, have no "commander", chief or otherwise. And they will
>     keep cheering for such acts even as the bodies of his latest
>     innocent victims go unburied. And if any of this bothers any of
>     us, we'll be drowned out by stirring and deeply emotional tributes
>     to the kindness and goodness of this great man, which will make
>     all these unpleasant thoughts about the reality of his actions
>     blissfully disappear.
>
>
>
> On 9/7/2012 11:13 PM, Chris Goodrow wrote:
>
>     A few things.  From a pure sense, Occupy in itself is/was a non
>     partisan movement.  Members of Occupy, however, are not quite so
>     non partisan for the most part.  Taking a stand in favor of
>     Bradley Manning is not going against Obama himself, but rather him
>     allowing Bradley Manning to be held for this long without trial
>     and in the conditions he's been held.  While going against many
>     policies that are now in place may appear to be going against
>     Obama, I really don't look at it that way.  I look at it more as
>     going against many policies this current administration currently
>     has in place.  Obama just happens to be at the head of this
>     administration.  I personally feel that doing anything differently
>     just because there is an election coming up is going against the
>     spirit of Occupy. Of course, individual members of Occupy are free
>     to do as they wish.
>
>     Chris Goodrow
>     (217) 898-5039
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     From: cge at shout.net <mailto:cge at shout.net>
>     Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:49:17 -0500
>     To: yaaqovz at gmail.com <mailto:yaaqovz at gmail.com>
>     CC: Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>     <mailto:Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; sf-core at yahoogroups.com
>     <mailto:sf-core at yahoogroups.com>; occupyCU at lists.chambana.net
>     <mailto:occupyCU at lists.chambana.net>
>     Subject: [OccupyCU] More local censorship
>
>     You can't handle the truth, eh, Ya'aqov?
>
>     And you presume to speak for all of the local Occupy folks?
>
>     I trust you're informing them of the reasons for your limitations
>     on free speech.
>
>     What have I written from which the eyes of the local Occupiers
>     must be protected?
>
>
>     On Sep 7, 2012, at 9:41 AM, ya'aQov <yaaqovz at gmail.com
>     <mailto:yaaqovz at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         /I created a filter dispatching to DELETE messages send from
>         your email in effect until 11-4-2012; sorry, your research
>         didn't inspire my dialectical thinking, Ya'aqov.
>         /
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________ OccupyCU mailing
>     list OccupyCU at lists.chambana.net
>     <mailto:OccupyCU at lists.chambana.net>
>     http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/occupycu
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Peace-discuss mailing list
>     Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net  <mailto:Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
>     http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
>        
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20120908/211f006d/attachment-0001.html>