[Peace-discuss] Vonnegut's "The Worst Addiction of Them All"

Rohn Koester rohnkoester at gmail.com
Wed Sep 19 13:29:19 UTC 2012


Hey Peace. I read Vonnegut's "The Worst Addiction of Them All" on AWARE on
the Air yesterday -- thought you might be interested (via *The Nation*,
December 31, 1983).

(Vonnegut's perspective still has a lot of traction, in my opinion,
although everywhere you read "Soviet," try substituting "The Terrorists."
Also, K.V.'s notion that war preparers don't really want to go to war has
turned out to seem awfully optimistic.)

rk

The Worst Addiction of Them All

Kurt Vonnegut

What has been America's most nurturing contribution to the culture of this
planet so far? Many would say Jazz. I, who love jazz, will say this
instead: Alcoholics Anonymous.

I am not an alcoholic. If I was, I would go before the nearest A.A. meeting
and say, "My name is Kurt Vonnegut. I am an alcoholic." God willing, that
might be my first step down the long, hard road back to sobriety.

The A.A. scheme, which requires a confession like that, is the first to
have any measurable success in dealing with the tendency of some human
beings, perhaps 10 percent of any population sample anyone might care to
choose, to become addicted to substances that give them brief spasms of
pleasure but in the long term transmute their lives and the lives of those
around them into ultimate ghastliness.

The A.A. scheme, which, again, can work only if the addicts regularly admit
that this or that chemical is poisonous to them, is now proving its
effectiveness with compulsive gamblers, who are not dependent on chemicals
from a distillery or a pharmaceutical laboratory. This is no paradox.
Gamblers, in effect, manufacture their own dangerous substances. God help
them, they produce chemicals that elate them whenever they place a bet on
simply anything.

If I was a compulsive gambler, which I am not, I would be well advised to
stand up before the nearest meeting of Gamblers Anonymous and declare, "My
name is Kurt Vonnegut. I am a compulsive gambler."

Whether I was standing before a meeting of Gamblers Anonymous or Alcoholics
Anonymous, I would be encouraged to testify as to how the chemicals I had
generated within myself or swallowed had alienated my friends and
relatives, cost me jobs and houses and deprived me of my last shred of
self-respect.

Not every member of A.A. or G.A. has sunk quite that low, of course--but
plenty have. Many, if not most, have done what they call "hitting bottom"
before admitting what it is that has been ruining their lives.

I now wish to call attention to another form of addiction, which has not
been previously identified. It is more like gambling than drinking, since
the people afflicted are ravenous for situations that will cause their
bodies to release exciting chemicals into their bloodstreams. I am
persuaded that there are among us people who are tragically hooked on
preparations for war.

Tell people with that disease that war is coming and we have to get ready
for it, and for a few minutes there, they will be as happy as a drunk with
his martini breakfast or a compulsive gambler with his paycheck bet on the
Super Bowl.

Let us recognize how sick such people are. From now on, when a national
leader, or even just a neighbor, starts talking about some new weapons
system which is going to cost us a mere $29 billion, we should speak up. We
should say something on the order of, "Honest to God, I couldn't be sorrier
for you if I'd seen you wash down a fistful of black beauties with a pint
of Southern Comfort."

I mean it. I am not joking. Compulsive preparers for World War III, in this
country or any other, are as tragically and, yes, as repulsively addicted
as any stockbroker passed out with his head in a toilet in the Port
Authority bus terminal.

For an alcoholic to experience a little joy, he needs maybe three ounces of
grain alcohol. Alcoholics, when they are close to hitting bottom,
customarily can't hold much alcohol.

If we know a compulsive gambler who is dead broke, we can probably make him
happy with a dollar to bet on who can spit farther than someone else. For
us to give a compulsive war-preparer a fleeting moment of happiness, we may
have to buy him three Trident submarines and a hundred intercontinental
ballistic missiles mounted on choo-choo trains.

If Western Civilization were a person--

If Western Civilization, which blankets the world now, as far as I can
tell, were a person--

If Western Civilizations, which surely now includes the Soviet Union and
China and India and Pakistan and on and on, were a person--

If Western Civilization were a person, we would be directing it to the
nearest meeting of War-Preparers Anonymous. We would be telling it to stand
up before the meeting and say, "My name is Western Civilization. I am a
compulsive war- preparer. I have lost everything I ever cared about. I
should have come here long ago. I first hit bottom in World War I." Western
Civilization cannot be represented by a single person, of course, but a
single explanation for the catastrophic course it has followed during this
bloody century is possible. We the people, because of our ignorance of the
disease, have again and again entrusted power to people we did not know
were sickies.

And let us not mock them now, any more than we would mock someone with
syphilis or smallpox or leprosy or yaws or typhoid fever or any of the
other diseases to which the flesh is heir. All we have to do is separate
them from the levers of power, I think.

And then what? Western Civilization's long, hard trip back to sobriety
might begin.

A word about appeasement, something World War II, supposedly, taught us not
to practice: I say to you that the world has been ruined by appeasement.
Appeasement of whom? Of the Communists? Of the neo-Nazis? No! Appeasement
of the compulsive war-preparers. I can scarcely name a nation that has not
lost most of its freedom and wealth in attempts to appease its own addicts
to preparations for war.

And there is no appeasing an addict for very long.

"I swear, man, just lay enough bread on me for twenty multiple re-entry
vehicles and a fleet of B-1 bombers, and I'11 never bother you again."

Most addictions start innocently enough in childhood, under agreeable,
reputable auspices-a sip of champagne at a wedding, a game of poker for
matchsticks on a rainy afternoon. Compulsive war-preparers may have been
encouraged as infants to clap their hands with glee at a campfire or a
Fourth of July parade.

Not every child gets hooked. Not every child so tempted grows up to be a
drunk or a gambler or a babbler about knocking down the incoming missiles
of the Evil Empire with laser beams. When I identify the war-preparers as
addicts, I am not calling for the exclusion of children from all martial
celebrations. I doubt that more than one child in a hundred, having seen
fireworks, for example, will become an adult who wants us to stop
squandering our substance on education and health and social justice and
the arts and food and shelter and clothing for the needy, and so on--who
wants us to blow it all on ammunition instead.

And please understand that the addiction I have identified is to *
preparations* for war. I repeat: to *preparations* for war, addiction to
the thrills of de-mothballing battleships and inventing weapons systems
against which there cannot possibly be a defense, supposedly, and urging
the citizenry to hate this part of humanity or that one, and knocking over
little governments that might aid and abet an enemy someday, and so on. I
am not talking about an addiction to war itself, which is a very different
matter. A compulsive preparer for war wants to go to big-time war no more
than an alcoholic stockbroker wants to pass out with his head in a toilet
in the Port Authority bus terminal.

Should addicts of any sort hold high office in this or any other country?
Absolutely not, for their first priority will always be to satisfy their
addiction, no matter how terrible the consequences may be--even to
themselves.

Suppose we had an alcoholic President who still had not hit bottom and
whose chief companions were drunks like himself. And suppose it were a
fact, made absolutely clear to him, that if he took just one more drink,
the whole planet would blow up.

So he has all the liquor thrown out of the White House, including his
Aqua-Velva shaving lotion. So late at night he is terribly restless, crazy
for a drink but proud of not drinking. So he opens the White House
refrigerator, looking for a Tab or a Diet Pepsi, he tells himself. And
there, half-hidden by a family-size jar of French's mustard, is an unopened
can of Coors beer.

What do you think he'll do?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20120919/0c6a99d8/attachment.html>


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list