[Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth Conference, Sep 8, 2013.

Tue Aug 20 14:02:54 UTC 2013

There were 400,000 tons of concrete and 25,000 tons of steel, if I'm not mistaken on my figures, in the WTC complex, but the pile of ruble was only 3 stories high.  This is like no other event in building history.  It is beyond our imaginations. You could see the trail of white dust from space.  The towers disintegrated in about 10 seconds each, which is highly comparable to the speed of a falling object under the force of gravity having no resistance underneath it.  Something had to have removed all the resistance to gravity to the top sections of the buildings.  Planes vs no Planes, hijackers / no hijackers is a huge subject in the 9/11 internet buzz that is a distraction to investigating how buildings could do this.

________________________________
 From: Tracy Postert <tracypostert at yahoo.com>
To: Stephen Francis <stephenf1113 at yahoo.com>; E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org> 
Cc: "peace at lists.chambana.net" <peace at lists.chambana.net>; "peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; "sftalk at yahoogroups.com" <sftalk at yahoogroups.com>; Wayne Coste <wcoste at ae911truth.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 6:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth Conference, Sep 8, 2013.

I didn't look at a television before 7PM on the day of 9/11, so by that time,
the networks were replaying the "plane crash" at the south face of WTC 2,
followed immediately by the subsequent destruction of the buildings.

I knew that 2 didn't follow from 1.

The notion of hijackings and plane crashes bothered me, certainly,
but it wasn't what gobsmacked me. What gobsmacked me was those
buildings going away. I was humbled by 9/11, because I knew that
what I
 was witnessing had no place in my understanding of the universe.
I knew I would have to learn something new in order to understand 9/11.
My understanding of the universe wasn't as good as I thought it was.
I am a scientific genius, and I'm not being overly proud of myself in
telling you this. I'm telling you this so that you can understand my point
of view. I earned my Ph.D. in 1999, and by that time I had amassed a 
great deal of
 understanding of the universe, but it wasn't good enough
to understand 9/11.

My home was attacked on 9/11. I feared for my lover and my friends.
For weeks after, every time I would see a friend I hadn't seen since
9/11, there would be this instant relief and joy, "Wow! You didn't die!"

For weeks and months we suffered from the fumes from Ground Zero
that would flood our apartment every day and night. 9/11 is personal.
I'm in it to win it. I will not rest until I discover what destroyed the
World Trade Center, and who did it.

Just don't tell me you know who did it if you think that what "it" was
was hijackings or bombs in the buildings, because neither of those
things happened.

Take a look at my new video series 
"9/11 TruthCraft" http://tinyurl.com/krmq7km
Self portrait    http://imgur.com/6wyZByl

________________________________
 From: Stephen Francis <stephenf1113 at yahoo.com>
To: Tracy Postert <tracypostert at yahoo.com>; E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org> 
Cc: "peace at lists.chambana.net" <peace at lists.chambana.net>; "peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; "sftalk at yahoogroups.com" <sftalk at yahoogroups.com>; Wayne Coste <wcoste at ae911truth.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth Conference, Sep 8, 2013.

Tracy brings up an important point I believe has not gotten enough attention by the MSM or even the 9/11 Truth movement.
That is... what looked like monstrous hot pyroclastic clouds rolling away from the falling WTC towers on 9/11 were not hot.
They were not hot enough to burn people or the tremendous amount of paper strewn all over the streets...
This is very odd and totally supports her views as a PhD scientist that 9/11 WTC destruction was "beyond the realmof commonly understood physical principles".  She will be discussing this at the conference.  
How it may lead to 'advanced weapons' being used, I have no idea, but we have to keep an open mind and go where the evidence points us.

________________________________
 From: Tracy Postert <tracypostert at yahoo.com>
To: E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org>; Stephen Francis <stephenf1113 at yahoo.com> 
Cc: "peace at lists.chambana.net" <peace at lists.chambana.net>; "peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; "sftalk at yahoogroups.com" <sftalk at yahoogroups.com>; Wayne Coste <wcoste at ae911truth.org>; occupycu <occupyCU at lists.chambana.net> 
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth Conference, Sep 8, 2013.

There have been many "leaks" related to 9/11. Sibel Edmonds, as one example.
But what she leaked about wasn't related to the attacks of 9/11. It was all about
Arabs, when Arabs played no role in the attacks. Her whistleblowing ended up
supporting the hijack conspiracy theory, which tells me that the US government
doesn't actually know what happened on 9/11. 

I realize that if you still think hijackings happened, then you're wishing I would
shut up. But hijackings didn't happen, and you just have to accept it and move
on if you want to catch the 9/11 perps.

Hijackings is not outside the realm of commonly understood physical principles.
Those buildings going down because of a "plane crash" is beyond the realm
of commonly understood physical principles. That
 doesn't mean that the laws
of physics were
 violated on 9/11. Rather, what it means is that there are some
laws of physics that we don't fully understand that were at play on 9/11.

Just like very few people knew about atom bombs before Hiroshima,
very few people know of this advanced weaponry and it's effects on steel
buildings. People want to know the name of it, so I call it "cold fission".

If some more appropriate word surfaces in the future that more accurately
describes the process, I'll abandon the phrase, but for now, I call it
cold fission.

The WTC complex, and all of its contents, were turned into powder at
low temperature. Cold fission, for now, is my best explanation.

________________________________
 From: E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org>

But a big problem is that there haven't been any leaks coming forward.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20130820/2a5c6724/attachment.html>