[Peace-discuss] Apology

[David Green]

Thanks David. Nevertheless, I feel compelled to work on having a code of ethics that compels me to use tactics that do not replicate or exacerbate the tactics of those with whom I do not agree, which risks changing the conversation from substance to etiquette.



On Thursday, January 23, 2014 7:02 PM, David Johnson <davidjohnson1451 at comcast.net> wrote:
  
David, 
>  
>You have NO reason to appologize, 
>  
>It is obvious that Gerard is no better than Schweighart 
and is deserving of any and all contempt. 
>  
>David Johnson 
>
>----- Original Message -----  
>>From: David  Green  
>>To: Peace Discuss ; discuss-communitycourtwatch at lists.chambana.net  
>>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:11  PM 
>>Subject: [Peace-discuss] Apology 
>>
>> 
>>In writing an email regarding the TIF public hearing on Tuesday, I went  too far in describing Don Gerard in pejorative terms. I apologize for  that--not because anyone complained or because I'm running for office--but  because it was rude and offensive of me to use the language I did. 
>>
>>I don't know Don Gerard personally at all. I do know that his behavior on  Tuesday was unbecoming of a public official at a public meeting, and indicated  a contempt for citizen participation in government decisions. Nevertheless, I  took it too personally. 
>>
>>I apologize for my own subsequent lapse in good judgment. Once again, I  must compliment Durl Kruse on his research and presentation into this matter,  which is so indicative of so much regarding our system. 
>>
>>David 
>>
>>________________________________
>>
_______________________________________________
>>Peace-discuss 
  mailing 
  list
>>Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>>https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
>>
>
>     
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20140123/107df187/attachment-0001.html>