[Peace-discuss] Fwd: Francis Boyle: Israel's Gaza Genocide Redux - Oral Arguments to War Crimes Tribunal

[Stuart Levy via Peace-discuss]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Francis Boyle: Israel's Gaza Genocide Redux - Oral Arguments 
to War Crimes Tribunal
Date: 	Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:27:26 -0700
From: 	<chicago at worldcantwait.net>
To: 	WCW Drivers List <wcwdrivers-chicago at yahoogroups.com>



Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (phone)
217-244-1478 (fax)
(personal comments only)

Israel's Gaza Genocide Redux
by Professor Francis A. Boyle

             I delivered the following Oral Argument before the Kuala
Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal Commission for the Indictment of
Israel for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity
on November 21, 2012 during Israel's genocidal Operation Cast
Lead II against the 1.7 million Palestinians living in Gaza.
The analysis and conclusions remain the same today during Cast
Lead III.  May it please the Commission:

You have heard the statutory declaration and evidence provided so far for
your information. My purpose here now is to explain the law to which you
will apply the facts in formulating your indictments.  Of course, it is
for you to decide whether or not to indict, or whom to indict. But you
have already received my recommendation that you should indict the state
of Israel, and named officials that I have already provided to you that
will be found again in the transcript of the proceedings, including and
especially General Yaron for war crimes, crimes against humanity and
genocide. And you've heard evidence and testimony from all of our
witnesses on those three points. Now let me briefly review the witnesses
and what they said from a legal prospective, so that you can formulate
your opinions of law in your indictment.

Palestinians in Gaza

First of all, with respect to the Al-Sammounis testimony, Salah and
Mahmoud. They are both from the Gaza Strip. Now, we have to understand,
the Gaza Strip is under military occupation by Israel. And Israel is the
belligerent occupant of the Gaza Strip. That means, at all times, Israel
is governed by the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 that protects
civilians and the Hague Regulations of 1907 on the Laws of Customs of
Warfare. You can find that also in the Chapter 5 for the Tribunal that is
roughly based and patterned upon them.

Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, the two Al-Sammounis are absolutely
protected. They are what are known as protected person. They are
civilians. Their rights are inviolable by Israel, or anyone else. In fact,
protected persons under the Fourth Geneva Convention have more rights that
legally are more perfectly protected than you or I have. That is the
gospel truth under International Law.

There are 147 articles of the Fourth Geneva Convention that were supposed
to protect the Al-Sammounis and everyone else in Gaza. And if you look at
all of the human rights reports that have been produced on Gaza, you will
see that Israel has violated almost each and every one of these 147
articles of the Fourth Geneva Convention with respect to the civilian
population of Gaza such as the Al-Sammounis.

Now, Israel has maintained that it is no longer the occupying power in
Gaza and therefore is not bound by the Fourth Geneva Convention and the
1907 Hague Regulations because it withdrew its troops from Gaza. That does
not change the situation legally. They are dead wrong. Professor Richard
Falk, the Special Rapporteur for Palestine, appointed by the UN Human
Rights Council itself had said, "No, this is nonsense, Israel is still the
occupying power in Gaza." His predecessor, Professor John Dugard of South
Africa, has also taken for the same position.  The International Committee
of Red Cross has taken the same position.  Why is that the case?

Because the test of belligerent occupancy is control. You could read this
for example, in U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10: The Laws of Land Warfare,
that set forth the basic rules of Customary International Law applicable
to all States in the world, including Israel and the United States.

Control of Gaza

Who controls Gaza today? We have heard testimonies Gaza is like an "open
air prison." Gaza is like a concentration camp. Gaza is surrounded at sea
where it is currently being bombarded today by the Israeli navy - as we
speak.  Gaza City, a city, is being bombarded by a navy. And it is
controlled by Israel on both the east and the south and surrounded by a
fence. As for the border of Egypt, it is completely cut off. Israel bombs
that border. They've just destroyed all the tunnels. In addition, despite
his rhetoric, President Morsi of Egypt has not opened up that border. It
is still sealed because the Egyptian military, that really runs Egypt
today, is in cahoots with Israel and the United States and keeps the
Egyptian border sealed.

The only exception, just announced two days ago, President Morsi has said,
"I will allow the evacuation of severely injured Palestinians through the
Rafah crossing into Egypt to get medical care. " But other than that, the
Egyptian border is sealed as well, and this has been the case since the
imposition of the siege of Gaza by Israel starting in 2007 with the
support of Egypt and the United States and the entire European Union. They
are all accomplices in the siege of Gaza.

And you have in your bundle Volume 2, tab M, a document produced by my
office: Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Crime of
Genocide, Gaza vs. Israel. As of this summer, it's quite comprehensive on
all these issues. Of course, it doesn't take into account the recent Cast
Lead II, as I will call it, that goes on today as we speak.

But clearly it is Israel that exercises control over Gaza. They bomb it.
They artillery shell it. They attack it. They invade it at will. So, of
course, they exercise control over Gaza, and for that reason, they remain
the belligerent occupant of Gaza subject to the Fourth Geneva Convention
of 1949 that protects all the civilians in Gaza, and the Hague Regulation
of 1907 that also protects the land and the environment of Gaza as well as
to some extent, the civilians. So, this is the legal regime applicable to
Gaza.

During the course of Mr. Al-Sammouni's testimony, Commissioner
Chossudovsky asked the question of "command and control" and I did want to
address that briefly: Who is responsible for war crimes, crimes against
humanity and genocide? And my brief develops the argument, 55 pages long,
about why Israel is committing genocide in Gaza today as we speak since at
least the time they imposed the siege of Gaza after Hamas had won a
democratic election in Gaza.

But to get back to command and control.  Of the tests under International
Law, the laws of war is that of command responsibility, that is, if a
commander of troops or others in the field, whether those commanders are
civilian or military personnel, either order war crimes or crimes against
humanity or genocide or committed themselves or know that their
subordinates are ordering it or committing it themselves and refused to
prevent it or stop it or punish it, they themselves are responsible for
those atrocities - for those acts of war crimes, crimes against humanity,
and genocide.

And as the situation is in Gaza today, when you have war crimes that are
widespread or systematic, they also become crimes against humanity. And
what we see in Gaza, certainly in the 2006 invasion, then Operation Cast
Lead 2008 and 2009, and now Operation Cast Lead II in 2012, is widespread
systematic war crimes against the civilian population that clearly
constitute crimes against humanity and even beyond that, genocide, for the
reasons cited in my brief that is part of the record.
And I also have distributed to you and introduced now formally into
evidence my article, Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. You already
have that but I'll introduce it.

And then the recommendation I personally put into the hands of the late
President Arafat that he sue Israel for committing genocide against
Palestine and the Palestinians at the International Court of Justice. And
I have also given this proposal, this recommendation, to President Abbas.
But because of enormous bullying, threats, intimidation inflicted upon
them, I don't think they're going to do it, though I stand by ready to
receive those instructions.  That means it's really up to you to defend
the Palestinians because they're not really in a position to defend
themselves.

Palestinians Rejected by the I.C.C.

Indeed, after Operation Cast Lead, I recommended to President Abbas that
Palestine accept the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court,
which President Abbas did do. And what happened? Mr. Moreno-Ocampo, the
ICC prosecutor threw it out and said, "Well, it's not for me to determine
whether Palestine is a state," despite the fact that Palestine had de jure
diplomatic relations with 133 states and also state membership in UNESCO,
a U.N. specialized agency.  Still Mr. Moreno-Ocampo this coward and this
hypocrite had the gall to just throw aside Palestine's acceptance of
jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and to investigate Israel
for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.

And there we stand today even when the Palestinians file a valid complaint
with the International Criminal Court, the ICC refuses to defend them. And
Mr. Moreno-Ocampo would not even lift one finger to help them. Not one
finger in their moment of desperation. He is truly a despicable human
being for this. And for this reason, we turn to you five Commissioners to
act to protect the Palestinians when the ICC prosecutor, Moreno-Ocampo,
refused even to lift one finger for them.

West Bank

Now, we come to the testimony of Mr. Alissawi.  He's from Bethlehem, the
West Bank. And let me again briefly explain to you the legal status of the
West Bank and Jerusalem and the regime of International Law that applies.

The West Bank too is occupied territory. All of it. This A-B-C baloney is
nonsense. This is just an apartheid regime set up by Israel that is in
violation of the Apartheid Convention of 1973. And apartheid is a crime
against humanity. The fact is Israel remains the belligerent occupant of
the West Bank. It is governed by the Four Geneva Conventions and the 1907
Hague Regulations, and every Palestinian living on the West Bank is a
protected person. Their rights are sacred under the International Law.
They have more rights than you and I have. And yet Israel has violated
each and every 147 Articles of that Convention with impunity.

             Why?  Because they have the backing of the United States of
America, the most powerful country in the world.  So, of
course Mr. Moreno-Ocampo copped out and refused to help them.
Indeed, the International Court of Justice accepted this argument in its
Advisory Opinion on Israel's wall on the West Bank. We have that Advisory
Opinion in the bundle of materials. If you read that Advisory Opinion, you
will see the World Court rejected each and every argument Israel has ever
made to maintain that it is not a belligerent occupant on the West Bank;
that is not governed by the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949; that it is
not governed by the 1907 Hague Regulations. The World Court rejected all
of it. All those arguments-fully, completely. They considered them all and
rejected every one of them. Israel does not even have a leg to stand on.
And there is no argument on the West Bank that's even plausible. No
argument.

Indeed, the World Court ruled that the settlements violated the Fourth
Geneva Convention. Any violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention is a war
crime. And when they are widespread and systematic as these settlements
are, they become a crime against humanity. And the settlers are committing
war crimes - all 600,000 of them. They are war criminals, except for the
children who legally are not capable of formulating criminal intent.

I would ask you, in drawing up your indictment, to bring John Does for
every settler living in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as war criminals.
They should all be prosecuted, each and every one of them. They go in
there and knowingly steal Palestinian land in violation of Hague
Regulations of 1907. They steal this land. They destroy the olive trees,
as we've heard. They steal the water. They rape and pillage Palestine to
support their own lifestyle and in pursuit of their fanatical dreams of
religious exclusivism that I don't believe people of any religion or good
faith or good will should tolerate or condone. The Bible had no right to
give Palestine to the Jews. Palestinians had lived there even before the
Bible was written.

We heard testimony about the use of dum-dum bullets against Mr. Alissawi.
Dum-dum bullets are clearly illegal and criminal in this context, armed
conflict, going back to the 19th century. Everyone knows it. Even the
Unites States of America government takes the position that dum-dum
bullets are illegal and their use is a war crime.

So, that is sort of the lowest common denominator, isn't it?  The United
States government. Israel in its behavior is even beneath and below the
criminal behavior that we've seen the United States government perform
around the world. To the best of my knowledge, I don't know of any recent
use of dum-dum bullets by the United States government. They could do it,
but generally speaking, it's a prohibited weapon.

Jerusalem

Now, with respect to Jerusalem, there has been discussion here on the
status of Jerusalem. I'm here to advise you on Jerusalem. Israel has not
one shred of right to Jerusalem.
They said, "Oh, it's our eternal capital." No one believes that. Even the
United States government does not accept that. Obama said that in his
campaign in 2008 to appeal to the Jewish vote. But once he got elected
president, even President Obama does not maintain this position.   It is
the official position in the United States Government that Jerusalem is
not the capital of Israel.  And that is why almost every government that
has diplomatic relations with Israel maintains their embassy in Tel Aviv
and not Jerusalem. No one recognizes that Israel has title to anything in
Jerusalem - East Jerusalem or West Jerusalem.

This is because Resolution 181 provided that Jerusalem would be a special
International Trusteeship not under the control of either the Jewish state
or the Arab state called for in the Partition Resolution.  No one
recognizes Israel has any right to Jerusalem. Period.  Even America does
not. It's not the position of the executive branch of the United States
government, and has never been. The last official articulation of our
position on Jerusalem can be found in this book. I will introduce this
book into evidence: Palestine, Palestinians, and International Law.  I
have an entire chapter here on the legal status of Jerusalem.

Even George Bush Senior, when he was U.S. ambassador to the United Nation,
fully articulated this position as our Ambassador to the U.N., that Israel
does not have title to Jerusalem. So technically, again, Jerusalem is
occupied territory. All the Palestinians living there, certainly in East
Jerusalem, are protected persons. All the settlers living in East
Jerusalem are committing war crimes and are war criminals, except for the
children who are not old enough to formulate criminal intent. These are
war crimes. I've been there. I've seen them. They steal the land. They
expel the Palestinians. And that process still goes on as we speak today,
day in and day out.

Torture

Mr. Musleh from Bethlehem, again, part of the West Bank. He is a civilian
- not a guerrilla, not a fighter. He was tortured. Yes, torture - a grave
breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, a serious war crime
mandating universal jurisdiction. I was all up and down Palestine, both
the West Bank, Jerusalem and Gaza myself in 1986. Torture was rampant all
over. I met many victims. They showed me the signs of torture on their
bodies.

Mr. Musleh 's testimony is certainly consistent with what I saw in two
weeks travelling there. And when I went to protest this at the American
Embassy, the torture, the grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, the
attaché said to me, "Well, we are not going to get involved in Israel's
domestic affairs."  It's astounding. It's an attaché at the American
Embassy at Tel Aviv.

I said, "What do you mean their domestic affairs? Torture violates the
Fourth Geneva Convention. The United States government is a party the
Fourth Geneva Convention. Under the terms of the Fourth Geneva Convention,
we have an obligation to respect and ensure respect for that convention in
all circumstances, which means stopping Israel's torture."

At that point he didn't argue with me. He just said, "Well, you'll have to
take it up in Washington." Well, as we know, Washington is controlled and
dominated by Zionists. That's a total waste of time.
But clearly Mr. Musleh's allegations of torture are consistent with my
investigation for two weeks, back in 1986. And again, where torture is
widespread and systematic, it becomes a crime against humanity. And in
addition, when you take a look at the Genocide Convention in this context:
Genocide consists of the following acts - causing serious bodily or mental
harm to members of the group.

Clearly we have had widespread systematic torture against the Palestinians
ever since 1967 up until today, both in the West Bank and East Jerusalem
and the Gaza Strip. This has been documented by every human rights
organizations in the world, including Amnesty International which is
notoriously pro-Israel and pro-United States. And I say that having spent
four years on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International USA. They
are notoriously pro-Israel and pro- United States. And yet, even Amnesty
International has condemned their torture. Professor Falk has condemned
their torture in his reports as Special Rapporteur.  Professor Dugard, his
predecessor, has condemned this torture.

Children

Israel, also with respect to Mr. Musleh's testimony on children, is a
party to the Children's Convention. And yet, they have abused Palestinian
children.  They've tortured them, they've imprisoned them, and they've
deprived them of education. There are hundreds of Palestinian children
still being detained in Israeli prisons. The World Court ruled, in its
Advisory Opinion, that Israel is bound to apply the Children's Convention
to Palestinians in occupied territory. They ruled that because it is a
party to the Children's Convention. Israel has violated almost each and
every provision of the Children's Convention when it comes to Palestinians
children. That's how pathetic that State is: They even torture and
imprison children.

Water

We've heard Mr. Musleh's testimony of the theft of the water, the main
aquifers, I've been there, I've seen this myself.  The main aquifer is, of
course, on the West Bank, this is Palestinian water. They are stealing the
Palestinian water so that settlers, these war criminals, can have swimming
pools.
I remember the first time I went to the Ariel settlement, in 1986, and
there was a Palestinian village down the road that was dying for lack of
water. And I followed the water pipe that had basically been cut off up
from the village to Ariel. Ariel had an Olympic-size swimming pool for
their war criminal-settlers. Meanwhile, the Palestinians were having their
water stolen and their village dying so that war criminals could go
swimming. I have read since then that Ariel has produced two Olympic-size
swimming pools. Israel does not have one shred of right under the Hague
Regulations of 1907 to one ounce of this Palestinian water. And yet they
are thirsting the Palestinians to death.

And this gets back to the Genocide Convention my colleague, Professor
Nijar, has pointed out, genocide means also "deliberately inflicting on
the group [here, Palestinians] conditions of life calculated to bring
about its physical destruction in whole or in part." They're thirsting
them to death so that their war criminals-settlers can swim in
Olympic-size swimming pools. The olive groves, pillaged. Outright pillage
that goes on all the time. One indiscriminate gang behavior by these war
criminal-settlers with the full cooperation and support of the Israeli
government. And it is organized, it's systematic and it's widespread. It's
a crime against humanity and a war crime.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

The testimony by Dr. Elkhatib dealing with the psychological conditions.
What the Genocide Convention says here?  "Genocide - causing serious
bodily or mental harm to the members of the group." We have heard the
testimony here today, that the entire Palestinian population suffers from
post-traumatic stress disorder. I've been there, I've seen it myself. Not
just the children. Men, women, parents, children. And especially the
people in Gaza who are being bombarded and killed and destroyed as we
speak today.

The report I heard this morning was 120 Gazans had been killed in this
murder in this Operation Cast Lead II. Where will this lead to? Where will
it end? Cast Lead I, 1,400 Palestinians were exterminated. In 2006, when
Israel bombed Lebanon, they exterminated 1,200 Lebanese. Just wiped them
out. Absolutely no accountability at all. And again, that's where you come
in.

Tear Gas

Tear gas: We have heard testimony of tear gas during the First Intifada.
It still goes on today. Israel uses special military-grade tear gas
against Palestinian civilians that they get from the United States and the
Republic of Korea, last I looked. We tried to stop it in the United States
- two factories manufactured it. We threatened to sue one of them, and
they stopped. We threatened to sue the second, they didn't stop. We sued
them and we lost.  Why did we lose all these cases on behalf of
Palestinians in the United States? Zionist control and domination of the
U.S. Federal Judiciary.
I personally have been involved in litigation going back to the Yaron case
which I submitted into the record.  That was the first case ever filed in
the entire world against an Israeli official for perpetrating a massacre
against Palestinians. Being my involvement in these cases since then, I'm
aware of only one case Palestinians had won in the United States courts.

The only one Meese v. P.L.O., Ramsey Clark, I did work with him. When the
Reagan administration tried to shut down the Palestinian Mission to the
United Nations organization in violation of U.N. Headquarters Agreement.
We did win that one. That's the only case I'm aware of we've won. And it's
pretty much a waste of time for any Palestinian to file any lawsuit in the
Zionist controlled and dominated United States. And I've been advised by
my Canadian friends that Canada isn't much better.  So, we come to this
Commission, to this Court, for justice.

Sabra and Shatilla

Madam Abouardini and Anne K. Sunde on the 1982 Sabra and Shatilla
massacre: I've already given you my essay on the Yaron case, the first
case ever on the Sabra and Shatila massacre. I've already described to you
our efforts, failed efforts to do anything both in the United States and
in Belgium, and I'm not aware of any other Court where we've been able to
get justice for the victims of Sabra and Shatilla. So we're coming to this
Court, to this Commission. We are asking, certainly, to indict General
Amos Yaron for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide for Sabra
and Shatilla; and at a minimum, at least, to list Ariel Sharon as
un-indicted co-conspirator, not that he isn't as guilty as sin, but he is
apparently in an irreversible coma, and for that reason would be incapable
of assisting in his defense.
And for that reason under basic legal principles, you probably should not
indict him but you can certainly list him as an un-indicted co-conspirator
for the Sabra and Shatilla massacre. You've expressed an interest in my
papers in this lawsuit. You can find them at Volume 5 of the Palestine
Yearbook of International Law 1989. It's in the article I gave you.
We saw in the testimony by Anne Sunde where General Yaron was located, on
the building, on the hill, overlooking the camp which is completely
consistent with what I told you. He could see everything. Indeed, it was
his troops that completely surrounded these camps. The flares are going
off at night. He then ordered his troops to let the Phalange militia to go
in there to perpetrate the massacre. The flares were going off at night so
that they can see what they were doing to carry out the massacre at night,
figuring they had a limited amount of time to carry out the massacre. So
they were working day and night to exterminate 3,500 completely innocent
Palestinians and some Lebanese as well- it's hard to figure out precisely
what their breakdown is, but mostly are, Palestinians, and some Lebanese -
all of them were completely unarmed.

And as Anne Sunde pointed out, the United States government under Philip
Habib had given a formal pledge of protection to the P.L.O. that if their
soldiers abandoned the camps where they were protecting these completely
innocent civilians, the United States government would assure their
safety. And on that condition, the P.L.O. fighters pulled out and moved
off to Tunis.
Now the Phalange militia, the Christian Phalange militia, was organized
under the Gemayel family. They were not part of the regular Lebanese army.
I have no information that the Lebanese army units were involved in this
massacre but the Christian Phalange militia were and when Bachir Gemayal
was assassinated, there's no evidence to believe that the Palestinians
assassinated Bachir Gemayal. Rumour had it it might have been Syria, it
might even have been Israel.  We really don't know. But no evidence
Palestinians did it.

General Yaron permitted the Christian Phalange to take out their revenge
on the completely innocent Palestinians at Sabra and Shatilla. And this
was known by Prime Minister Begin and Defence Minister Ariel Sharon -
speaking of the chain of command - and Rafael Eitan, the Chief of Staff,
though the only survivors, as I've said, are General Yaron and Sharon, and
he is in irreversible coma.
But again, the massacre took place with Yaron on that roof with the full
view of the camps, illuminated at night by flares and in communication
with the Phalange militia with their head Elie Hobeika there on the roof
with him with a walkie-talkie commanding them through the night on how to
carry out this massacre. And the United States government knew from the
get-go that a massacre was taking place. And despite the Habib promise of
protection, they refused to do anything at all about it. They just let the
massacre go on. Which raises the question for you to resolve of complicity
by the United States government with the genocide at Sabra and Shatilla.
And I will urge you to consider that. And if you agree with me, to indict
the United States for complicity in the Sabra and Shatilla massacre.
Obviously these proceedings are directed against the state of Israel and
its highest level officials, but as Commissioners Halliday and von Sponeck
correctly pointed out, it is fair to consider aiders and abettors by other
states, and those other states that are complicit. And certainly, we know
for a fact, Israel gets most of its weapons from the United States
government that it uses to kill and destroy and exterminate Palestinians.

Genocide - Health-care

Ms. Nimat's testimony: Yes, Israel has consistently bombed and destroyed
hospitals, health-care facilities and have attacked professional
health-care people.  Doctors, we've also heard the testimony, the doctor
from Bethlehem. They're deliberately targeted. We know they have special
protections under the Geneva Conventions.   Israel couldn't care less.
Indeed, again, it raises the issue of genocide - deliberately inflicting
on a people conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical
destruction in whole and in part. How? By destroying their whole
health-care infrastructure. That's how. Including their doctors, their
nurses, their psychiatric people, etc.

We've already discussed Professor Manduca's testimony about the white
phosphorus. Again, even the United States government itself takes the
position that the use of white phosphorus in warfare is a war crime, and
at least says it's not supposed to do it. Notice, Israel doesn't care. We
all saw those picture in Cast Lead I, of Israel, live footage on Press TV
and Al-Jazeera, not the Zionist-controlled and dominated U.S. news media -
but live pictures of them raining white phosphorus down on Gaza city and
Gaza civilians. And it doesn't help to say, "Well we're just using it as
tracers for artillery," because it just means that the artillery was aimed
at Gaza City and the Gaza civilians, which is also a war crime.

In its resolution of 19 October 2000, the U.N. Human Rights Commission,
later Council, condemned Israel for committing war crimes and crimes
against humanity against the Palestinians. The Goldstone Report reached
the same conclusion. And Goldstone was a Zionist who was put in there to
do damage control for Israel. And that's exactly what he did. He softened
that Report as best he could. And even the Goldstone Report found that
they had committed war crimes and crimes against humanity. The better
report that does not do damage control for Israel is the Dugard Report
that is cited in my brief on behalf of the League of Arab States.
Professor Dugard was the Special Rapporteur for Palestine, very courageous
human being - white resister to apartheid in South Africa, at threat to
his life he stood up against apartheid in South Africa. So if you're going
to go for a definitive account on Cast Lead I, you should look at the
Dugard Report and realise that Goldstone was put in there to do damage
control for Israel and he significantly watered down his findings and
conclusions. But even there, Goldstone found Israel had committed war
crimes and crimes against humanity in Cast Lead I.

Crimes against Humanity

Where do crimes against humanity come from? They come from the Nuremberg
Charter of 1945, drafted by the United States government and intended to
deal with the Nazi persecution of the Jews. And let me repeat this. This
is the idea of the United States of America to legally come to grips with
the Nazi persecution of the Jews. And what does Nuremberg say?  Crimes
against humanity: murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and
other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population or
persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds. Well, that's
exactly what Israel does to the Palestinians. These are Nazi crimes. We
have to be honest about it. They are not yet on a scale of 6 million dead
Jews. But they are moving in that direction. So it's not the number here,
but it's the quality of the offence. So we have to understand. Just
applying the Nuremberg definition intended to prosecute Nazi crimes
against Jews, these are the same types of crimes. Not the number, but
certainly the type.

Genocide

The crime against humanity is a precursor to genocide. Indeed, it was
thought that crime against humanity was so serious that it should be
codified in an international treaty. That what Hitler and the Nazis did to
the Jews should be made a crime for any government to do to any people.
And so we had the 1948 Genocide Convention. And Article 2, if you read the
proposal I gave personally to President Arafat to sue Israel for genocide,
defines the crime of genocide, "any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy in whole or in part a national, ethnic or racial or
religious group as such." So notice, "in part." It does not have to be
like Hitler and the Nazis intending to exterminate all of the Jewish
people. Nope. The Genocide Convention tried to prevent this from happening
and say, "well, we have to set the threshold lower." If you have the
intention to destroy "in part" a national, ethnic, racial or religious
group as such, that qualifies as genocide. And clearly, let's take "Cast
Lead'', 1,400 exterminated Palestinians. The International Court of
Justice ruled that even the 7,000 exterminated Bosnians at Srebrenica
constituted genocide.

As documented by Israeli historian Ilan Pappe in his seminal work, The
Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Israel's genocidal policy against the
Palestinians have been "unremitting" extending from the very foundation of
the State of Israel in 1948 until today, and continuing today as manifest
in what we see in Gaza.

Even the U.N. General Assembly President, Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann, the
former Foreign Minister of Nicaragua called "Cast Lead" 'genocide'. And
Brockmann should know. He was Foreign Minister of Nicaragua during
Reagan's war against Nicaragua when Reagan exterminated 35,000
Nicaraguans; and I was down there for a week up in the war zone
investigating contra atrocities.

Certainly Israel and the Zionist agencies, forces and terrorist groups
have committed genocide against the Palestinians that started on or about
1948 and has continued apace until today in violation of the Genocide
Convention. Israel and its Zionist agencies and predecessors have
ruthlessly implemented a systematic, comprehensive military, political,
economic, campaign with intent to destroy in substantial part the
national, ethnical, racial and religious group -- Jews versus Muslims and
Christians -- constituting the Palestinian people. This consists of
killing members of the group, in violation of Article 2(a), inflicting
serious bodily and mental harm to the Palestinian people in violation of
Convention Article 2(b). And also deliberately inflicting on the
Palestinian people conditions of life calculated to bring about their
physical destruction in whole or in part.

Peace process

We have heard a lot about the so-called peace process. This is a joke and
a fraud. I was the lawyer for the Palestinian delegation to the Middle
East Peace negotiations from the start in 1991 until Oslo was signed in
1993, both for the P.L.O., President Arafat, and my client the late, great
Dr. Haidar Abdul-Shaffi, who was Chair of those peace negotiations. Israel
never demonstrated one iota of good faith in their negotiations with the
Palestinians. Not one. Oslo was an Israeli Bantustan proposal that was
imposed upon President Arafat despite the best advice I gave him, and the
opposition of Dr. Abdul-Shaffi. As he saw it, he had nothing better to do
at that time. I am certainly not here to criticize him. He was the
democratically elected leader of the Palestinian people, not Dr.
Abdul-Shaffi, certainly not me. But the bottom line is, I've been involved
in this process from the beginning.

There is no peace process. This is a Palestinian surrender process. A
Palestinian Bantustanization process devised by the United States in
cooperation with Israel and with the full support of the European Union
and its member states. Indeed, shortly before he died in the summer of
2007, I called up Dr. Abdul-Shaffi, and he said to me -- this is the man
in charge of negotiating peace -- and he said, "The Zionists have not
changed their objectives since the Basel Conference of 1897!" That was
2007.

In the Basel conference, the Zionists made it clear: They want all of
Palestine - West Bank, Jerusalem, what is 1948 Israel. They want it all.
And they want it without Palestinians. And nothing has changed. That is
the objective of Netanyahu, and Barak and Peres, and Lieberman, that I'm
asking you here today to indict. And if we don't bring Israel, this rogue
criminal state, to justice, and if we do not bring their leaders, their
highest level officials to justice, they will take all of Palestine and
they will expel, disperse, and drive out the Palestinians. And that is
what is at stake here today. And that is the task confronting you.

Conclusion

I have gone all over the world seeking justice for the Palestinians for
the last 30 years. And I am now coming here today and asking you to indict
this criminal rogue state Israel, its aiders and abettors, and its highest
level officials, President Peres, Netanyahu, Lieberman, Barak, its chiefs
of staff and their predecessors, the rapist Katsav, Olmert, Livni,
Ashkenazi, and before that, General Amos Yaron.  Thank you.



Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (phone)
217-244-1478 (fax)
(personal comments only)




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20140715/84f0813d/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20140715/84f0813d/attachment-0003.html>