[Peace-discuss] Gridlock (Once Again) Rescues Social Security from Obama and the GOP

[David Johnson]

Gridlock (Once Again) Rescues Social Security from Obama and the GOP
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by executive editor Glen Ford
What saved Social Security - for the moment, at least - was the Republicans continued refusal to join the First Black President in a Grand Bargain."

President Obama now says that he won't include cuts in Social Security as part of his upcoming budget request to Congress. His apologists on the left, like MoveOn.org, quickly "thanked" Obama for the gesture, grateful that they wouldn't have to eat another Satan's Sandwich from the White House kitchen. But the Democratic loyalists should not be allowed to take credit for changing their hero's mind about Social Security. Obama hasn't paid them a bit of attention in the past five years, knowing that, every time an election rolls around, they will return to the Democratic Party fold like hungry puppies, or wayward children.
What saved Social Security - for the moment, at least - was the Republicans continued refusal to join the First Black President in a Grand Bargain in which the two business parties would work hand in hand, in the spirit of bipartisanship, to dismantle what's left of the social safety net. Barack Obama fervently hoped that he would go down in history as the man who finally unraveled Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal and Lyndon Johnson's Great Society, through a consensus of the two major parties. He repeatedly stuck out his hand to his corporate colleagues on the other side of the aisle. Luckily for the rest of us, however, the Republicans always slapped his hand away, preferring gridlock to a shared victory.
And so begins Year Six of the Obama presidency, with another White House assault on entitlements frustrated, not so much by progressives, but by the intransigent, racist Right. Gridlock, once again, to the rescue.

Barack Obama fervently hoped that he would go down in history as the man who finally unraveled Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal and Lyndon Johnson's Great Society."

We at Black Agenda Report take some pleasure in saying, We told you so. Specifically, back in November of 2010, when the Democrats lost control of the House of Representatives, we concluded that, given the relationship of forces, gridlock was the best we could hope for. "Let us pray for gridlock," I wrote, "because all else is disaster."
Obama had already handpicked a deficit cutting commission whose job was to create an austerity model that the Republicans and the right wing of the Democrats could agree upon. The more liberal Democrats would be cast into the dustbin of history, along with their favorite social programs. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said those Democrats who balked at Obama's steady rightward course were "crazy" and "ought to be drug-tested." The liberals' feelings were hurt, but of course, they kept coming home like little puppies. They suffered through 2011, when Obama put all entitlement programs on the grand bargaining table - only for the Republicans to ultimately reject the collaboration in favor of overreach and games of chicken.
Essentially, gridlock - and its associated drama - has prevailed on Capitol Hill ever since, preventing Obama and the Republicans from coordinating their strategies on behalf of the One Percent. Race plays a definite role in this - and, for once, it has worked in the people's favor, by keeping natural corporate allies, who share very similar agendas, at each other's throats much of the time.
But, this gridlock on the Right will end sooner rather than later. The people's domestic programs, international peace, and the viability of the planet, must ultimately be saved by a people movement, or it will not be saved, at all.
For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford. On the web, go to BlackAgendaReport.com.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford at BlackAgendaReport.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20140303/225173b7/attachment.html>