[Peace-discuss] [OccupyCU] Fwd: Fwd: Unable to deliver your message

[C. G. Estabrook]

There's an anti-war wing to the Republican party, but there's no anti-war wing to the Democratic party: e.g.,

<http://reason.com/archives/2014/04/28/hillary-clinton-the-unrepentant-hawk>.

And of course Obama has no legal authority to assassinate anyone. Read the Fifth Amendment. 

--CGE


On May 4, 2014, at 8:35 PM, Stan <swag901 at ymail.com> wrote:

> Bush 43 and the republicans past legal authority for president Obama to do what he is doing. I don't necessarily agree with it but it could be better than the alternative so we have what we have.  As long as we do not take back the Democratic Party we have no one to blame but ourselves.
> 
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
> 
> 
> "C. G. Estabrook" <carl at newsfromneptune.com> wrote:
> 
> The president we're responsible for has killed thousands with drones alone (including hundreds of children).
> 
> Were he held to the standards we imposed on German leaders at Nuremberg, Obsama would be declared guilty of war crimes and hanged. 
> 
> --CGE
> 
> 
> On May 4, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Stan <swag901 at ymail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Well I must tell you that as a general opponent to the drone program collateral damage is never a good thing. however as a reasonable man I must tell you that if we had used the drone program to take out osama bin laden  and KSM before 9/11 perhaps we could have saved 3000 lives at the world trade center, about 7000 u s military lives, about a million innocent Iraqi lives and then there is the 2 trillion dollars in added debt to our country from not having used drones prior to 9/11. thanks.
>> 
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
>> 
>> 
>> "C. G. Estabrook" <carl at newsfromneptune.com> wrote:
>> 
>> ...top Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein has been a staunch supporter of the remote-control assassination program, noting that "during a February 2013 confirmation hearing for CIA Director John Brennan, Feinstein stated that the CIA’s targeting procedures kills only “single digits” of civilians annually." Try to imagine an ordinary human being standing up in court to defend a serial killer by saying that he only kills single digits of people annually." Is that so wrong? Or hell, imagine your co-worker turning to you in the office and saying, "I ain't such a bad person, you know; I probably don't kill more than six or seven innocent people a year." Try to imagine what kind of mindset believes that as long you hold your murder rate of innocent people to "single digits," then that's OK. What would you say if someone talked to you in that way? You would say, quite rightly, that they were insane. Criminally insane, and very dangerous...  
>> 
>> http://www.chris-floyd.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/2388-mad-men-the-lunatic-fringe-that-leads-the-west.html
>> _______________________________________________
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20140504/efd53254/attachment.html>