[Peace-discuss] at HuffPo: There's No Republican Mandate for More War

[E. W. Johnson via Peace-discuss]

Don't give 'em any bad ideas.

(They have enough already)


On 11/06/2014 05:12 AM, Robert Naiman via Peace-discuss wrote:
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/theres-no-republican-mand_b_6108784.html
>
> [...]
> It's true that some Republican candidates tried to use the "ISIS 
> crisis" to portray Democrats as "weak on national security." But these 
> Republicans haven't yet been forced to put forward and defend any 
> specific "more aggressive" alternative policy in the court of public 
> opinion. It's one thing to say that you think the President is doing a 
> bad job confronting ISIS. It's quite another to be forced to say what 
> exactly you would do differently.
>
> Do these Republicans want to see U.S. ground troops engaged in combat 
> against ISIS in Iraq and Syria? If so, let them say so on the record; 
> let them introduce and vote for an authorization of force for Iraq and 
> Syria that includes the use of ground combat troops...
> [...]
>
> ===
>
> Robert Naiman
> Policy Director
> Just Foreign Policy
> www.justforeignpolicy.org <http://www.justforeignpolicy.org>
> naiman at justforeignpolicy.org <mailto:naiman at justforeignpolicy.org>
> (202) 448-2898 x1 <tel:%28202%29%20448-2898%20x1>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20141106/112fb44e/attachment.html>