[Peace-discuss] My interactions with the N-G

[E. W. Johnson via Peace-discuss]

It's a clear case of
"the destestable and abhomynable vice of /*corkery*//*
*/ comyttid with mankynde".

The mainstream media seem to be "comyttid" to
this sort of thing and the NG is no exception in
corkering the public.

There is a continuing need for alternative media.
A successful alternative newspaper needs to have stuff like ads and wantads
and coupons and public announcements and other public
services.  Also at least some of the articles need to
have resonance with ideas and memes already present
in the public otherwise your words will just go into the air.

If it is too much like reading the phonebook it wont have much effect.

Likewise a website has to have traffic to be impactful.


On 11/29/2014 02:29 AM, David Green via Peace-discuss wrote:
> As many of you undoubtedly know, I've published many letters over the 
> years in the N-G, and over the last 5 years or so, quite a few Sunday 
> guest commentaries from an overtly leftist and radical perspective. 
> I've always felt that it is important to reach a broader audience in 
> any way available. I took it as a sign of some minimal sense of 
> fairness on the part of the N-G editors (mostly the retired John Beck, 
> I think) to allow me that space (or, from another perspective, allow 
> me to work for free).
>
> Last summer I submitted a piece related to both Gaza and Jewish 
> dissidence regarding Israel. Dan Corkery, the managing 
> editor, rejected it with the excuse that he had already published one 
> article from a critical perspective, and that there were no others 
> from a pro-Israel perspective that had been submitted to provide 
> "balance." I wrote to him that I was "disgusted by his behavior." That 
> provided him with an excuse to no longer publish my submissions. I may 
> have shot myself in the foot; so be it. Nevertheless it would appear, 
> whatever Corkery's benign persona as managing editor, that he has 
> really limited the space for alternative perspectives since he took 
> over; his choices are heavily weighted toward the trivial and the 
> banal, as well as the overtly right wing. I suspect that he was 
> looking for an excuse, and I gave him one.
>
> This may sound self serving, but it's just as well for me to move on 
> from that particular approach (among many), although they will 
> continue to accept my letters. I'm sure that there are many in the 
> activist community who have always wanted nothing to do with the N-G, 
> and that's understandable. But certainly this morning's editorial in 
> full-blown justification of the murder of Michael Brown achieves a new 
> low, if that is possible, and has prompted me to send this message to 
> these lists.
>
> In any event and for whatever it's worth, what is pasted below is a 
> message I sent to Dan Corkery a few days ago, subsequent to an initial 
> apologetic e-mail and his acceptance of my apology while affirming 
> that my commentaries would no longer be welcome. I don't pretend that 
> this is anything that most readers of these lists don't already know; 
> nevertheless, thank you for indulging me:
>
> Dan;
>
> I appreciate your response and your acceptance of my apology. My 2 
> cents at this point, in the spirit of honesty and truth as I see it, 
> whether regarding you personally or the editors collectively, is that 
> a significant segment of our community is utterly and blatantly 
> dis-respected and dismissed by the News-Gazette, and is well aware of 
> that. Similarly, the News-Gazette has earned the routine and 
> dismissive contempt of those of us who sincerely and actively wish to 
> make the world a better place in ways that the N-G editors do not 
> approve of. It is viewed by hundreds and perhaps thousands of 
> community members, frankly, with utter contempt and worse. My efforts 
> have always been to bridge that gap and to act in good faith and 
> respect--but these efforts were ultimately doomed to fail in a context 
> that is "fair and balanced" between truth and lies. The racist and 
> prejudicial currents that predominate at the N-G simply run too deep 
> and are too reflexive, whether regarding minorities, the poor, 
> Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, or demonized nations like Iran and North 
> Korea--not to mention state government employees, union members, and 
> school teachers. Hate is by no means too strong a word to describe 
> your newspaper's modus operandi, especially regarding Palestinians, a 
> sincere interest of mine. And the U of I boosterism regarding 
> administration, sports, etc. only adds to the perception and reality 
> of that lack of objectivity. Whatever the sincerity or professionalism 
> of your own contribution, in my honest view you have no reason to 
> believe that the News-Gazette contributes in any serious way toward 
> making our community, state, and world a better and more informed 
> place. Indeed, it is a source of an enormous amount of pernicious 
> dis-information, on a regular and systematic basis. In an educated and 
> progressive community with enormous potential, that is a real shame, 
> and a real missed opportunity. Whatever dis-respect I may have shown 
> to you merely reflects this ongoing context.
>
> David Green
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20141129/180bfb9e/attachment-0001.html>