[Peace-discuss] ISIS, Double Standards, and the Fight in Kobani
David Johnson via Peace-discuss
peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
Mon Oct 13 20:01:33 EDT 2014
Green Shadow Cabinet <http://greenshadowcabinet.us/>
Green Shadow Cabinet <http://greenshadowcabinet.us/>
ISIS, Double Standards, and the Fight in Kobani
October 10, 2014
Ajamu Baraka, Public Intervenor for Human Rights
<http://greenshadowcabinet.us/member-profile/7568>
*/While ISIS moves to slaughter Kurds in Kobani, the current situation
is part of the cynical farce that is the fight against ISIS
/*
The U.S. is not interested in altering the balance of forces on the
ground in Syria by seriously degrading ISIS militarily and undermining
its primary short-term strategic objective of regime change in Syria.
/Common Dreams/
<http://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/10/10/isis-double-standards-and-fight-kobani>
The U.S. is conducting a curious humanitarian war against ISIS in Syria.
While Kobani, the largely Kurdish district that straddles the border
with Turkey is being attacked by ISIS forces and facing the very real
possibility of mass civilian killings if it falls, U.S. military
spokespersons claimed that they are watching the situation in Kobani and
have conducted occasional bombing missions but that they are
concentrating their anti-ISIS efforts in other parts of Syria. Those
other efforts appear to consist of bombing empty buildings
<http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/09/24/us-bombed-empty-buildings-in-raqqa-in-airstrikes-on-isil-in-syria/>,
schools, small oil pumping facilities, an occasional vehicle and grain
silos
<http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/29/us-mideast-crisis-syria-idUSKCN0HO0EV20140929>
where food is stored to feed the Syrian people. Turkey also seems to be
watching as the Kurds of Kobani fight to the death against ISIS.
The humanitarian concerns of officials in the U.S. with the plight of
Kurds in Kobani could not be more different than what occurred in Iraq
when ISIS forces made a push into Kurdish territory. When the Kurdish
city of Erbil was under attack by ISIS, U.S. forces unleashed the full
power of its air force in tactical coordination with Kurdish forces to
push ISIS back.
So what is the difference in the two situations?
The difference and the reason why the Kurds of Kobani are to be
sacrificed stems from the fact that they are the wrong kind of Kurds.
Masoud Barzani and the bourgeois Kurds of the Kurdish Democratic Party
(KDP) are the "good Kurds" and the predominant force among the Kurds of
Iraq. Their control of almost 45% of Iraqi oil reserves and the
booming business that they have been involved in with U.S. oil companies
and Israel since their "liberation" with the U.S. invasion makes them a
valued asset for the U.S. The same goes for Turkey where despite the
historic oppression of Kurds in Turkey, the government does a robust
business with the Kurds of Iraq.
The situation is completely different in the Kurdish self-governing
zones in Syria. In Kobani, it is the Kurdish People's Protection Units,
or Y.P.G., that is linked to the Kurdistan Workers Party (P.K.K), a
Turkey-based Kurdish independence organization that both the U.S. and
Turkey have labeled a "terrorist" organization, that provides the main
forces resisting the ISIS attack. Also, the ISIS attack in Kurdish
territory neatly converges with the strategic interests of Turkey. Both
the U.S. and Turkey saw the control of territory by militant Kurds as a
threat. Turkey in particular wanted to undermine the self-governing
process among Kurds, Christians and Sunni Arabs in those self-governing
zones and turn the territory into a battlefield in order to steal Syrian
territory and isolate and attack the "bad" Kurds of the PKK.
Turkey pushed and apparently secured an agreement from the U.S. that it
will not oppose it taking parts of Syrian territory. To consolidate that
land grab Turkey also wants to establish a "buffer zone" along the
Syrian-Turkey border. This is why U.S. government spokespersons have
been floating the idea of a no-fly zone in Northeastern Syria
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/27/world/middleeast/us-considers-a-no-fly-zone-to-protect-civilians-from-airstrikes-by-syria-.html?_r=1>
in the U.S. state/corporate media. The zone is being framed as necessary
to protect civilians from attacks by the Syrian forces -- the
humanitarian hustle again.
Yet for the "bad" Kurds of Syria like the "bad" Palestinians of Hamas
and Gaza, there will be no humanitarian intervention.
To placate the Turkish government in exchange for its increased
cooperation in what is being set-up as a final push on Damascus, the
people of Kobani will be delivered to ISIS.
The transparency of Turkey's plan and the collaboration of the U.S. in
the planned massacre of YPG combatants at Kobani could be easily exposed
in the U.S. if the news readers in the corporate press were actually
able to "see" the world more critically and allowed to question the
state sanctioned narratives without running the risk of ending their
"careers." For example, the obvious question regarding a no-fly zone in
Northeastern Syria is why is it necessary when the only civilians being
attacked in Northeastern Syria are Kurds and they are being attacked by
ISIS forces that don't have an air force, at least not yet.
But those questions are not being asked very often because they don't
comport with the official narrative that the U.S. is compelled to act
once again to save the world against an intractable enemy that can only
be defeated by U.S. military might. All of this is part of the
imperialist hustle that even large segments of the "left" in the U.S.
has fallen for.
However, the non-bombing of ISIS at Kobani and the theatrics of bombing
fixed, empty buildings confirm what should be obvious based on the
history of U.S. interventions -- that the real objective of U.S.
intervention in Iraq and Syria is the reintroduction of direct U.S.
military power in the region in order to secure continue control over
the oil and natural gas resources of the region, undermine Iran, block
the Russian Federation, and break-up cooperative economic and trade
agreements between counties in Central Asia and China. In other words,
the objective is to secure U.S. and Western colonial/capitalist
hegemony. The U.S. and its allies just needed a pretext to get back in
without alienating large sectors of their domestic populations. ISIS
give them what the sarin gas attacks could not -- mass acceptance in the
West for another war, however limited it is being sold in its first phase.
The militarists in the U.S. political establishment never wanted to
abandon their plans for a permanent military presence in Iraq, even in
the face of the fact that it was costing the nation an enormous price in
blood, treasure and domestic legitimacy to remain. They concluded that
the road back to Bagdad and on to Tehran went through Syria. A position
that despite reports to the contrary, Obama signed on to early in his
administration. All Obama wanted was some plausible deniability during
the first phase of the plan to destabilize Syria.
The current situation in Kobani is part of the cynical farce that is the
fight against ISIS. Turkey has no interest in preventing Kobani from
falling to ISIS when it suits its strategic interests to deny the Kurds
any semblance of self-determination. And the U.S. is not interested in
altering the balance of forces on the ground in Syria by seriously
degrading ISIS militarily and undermining its primary short-term
strategic objective of regime change in Syria.
With the creation of ISIS, the neocons and liberal interventionists now
have their war and a sizeable portion of the U.S. public is in support,
at least at this point . But that support will change as soon as it
becomes clear that the political elite has plunged the U.S. back into
another quagmire. The real shame and expression of the white supremacist
colonial/capitalist global contradiction is that until that awareness
takes hold among the people at the center of the empire and the people
there move to alter U.S. war policies, thousands more will die in Kobani
and throughout Syria, Iraq and the world.
~///Ajamu Baraka/
<http://greenshadowcabinet.us/member-profile/7568>/serves as Public
Intervenor for Human Rights on the Democracy Branch of the Green Shadow
Cabinet./
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20141013/c036d0da/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15862 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20141013/c036d0da/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list