[Peace-discuss] September 11...

C. G. Estabrook via Peace-discuss peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
Mon Sep 1 22:42:44 EDT 2014


> New post on Corey Robin
> 
> Breaking News! Wise to Forward Salaita Appointment to Trustees!
> by Corey Robin
> We are getting reports out of the University of Illinois that Chancellor Wise is going to forward the Salaita appointment to the Board of Trustees for a vote on September 11. A group of Gender and Women's Studies students reports the following:
> 
> From GWS Undergraduate Stephanie Skora's report back on meeting with Chancellor Wise on Monday, September 1, 2014:
> 
> The meeting with Chancellor Wise was a success, and we have gained some valuable information and commitments from the Chancellor!
> 
> We have discovered that the Chancellor HAS FORWARDED Professor Salaita's appointment to the Board of Trustees, and they will be voting on his appointment during the Board of Trustees Meeting on September 11th, on the UIUC campus! Our immediate future organizational efforts will focus around speaking at, and appearing at, this Board of Trustees meeting. We will be attempting to appear during the public comment section of the Board of Trustees meeting, as well as secure a longer presentation to educate them on the issues about which Professor Salaita tweeted. Additionally, we are going to attempt to ensure that the Board of Trustees consults with a cultural expert on Palestine, who can explain and educate them about the issues and the context surrounding Professor Salaita's tweets. It has been made clear to us that the politics of the Board of Trustees is being allowed to dictate the course of the University, and that the misinformation and personal views of the members of the Board are being allowed to tell the students who is allowed to teach us, regardless of who we say that we want as our educators. We will not let this go unchallenged.
> 
> Additionally, Chancellor Wise has agreed to several parts of our demands, and has agreed upon a timeline under which she will take steps to address them. The ball is currently in her court, but we take her agreements as a gesture of good faith and of an attempt to rebuild trust between the University administration and the student body. She has not agreed unilaterally to our demands, and but we have made an important first step in our commitment to reinstating Professor Salaita. In terms of his actual reinstatement, the power to make that decision is not hers. This is why we have shifted the target of our efforts to the Board of Trustees, because they alone have the power to reinstate and approve Professor Salaita's appointment at the University. In regards to the rest of our demands, which we have updated to reflect the town hall meeting, we have made progress on all of those, but continue to emphasize that it is unacceptable to meet any of our demands without first reinstating Professor Salaita.
> 
> We have made progress, but we all have a LOT of work left to do. We must organize, write to the Board of Trustees, and make our voices and our presences known. We will not be silent on September 11th, and we will not stop in our efforts to reinstate Professor Salaita, regardless of what the Board of Trustees decides.
> 
> Please keep organizing, please keep making your voices heard, and please‪#‎supportSalaita‬!
> 
> Also, feel free to message or comment with any questions, comments, or concerns.
> 
> Assuming the report is accurate, I can think of two interpretations of what it means.
> 
> If the UIUC is thinking politically, it would be an absolute disaster for them to open this can of worms, to act as if Salaita's appointment is now a real possibility, to raise expectations for two weeks or so, to encourage all the organizing this will encourage (I can imagine the phone calls and emails that will now start pouring into the Board of Trustees), only to have the Board vote Salaita down. From a political perspective, this would be a disaster for the university. The strongest weapon the UIUC has always had is the sense that this is a done deal, that they will not budge, that we can raise all the ruckus we want, but they simply don't care. Opening the decision up again calls that into question. Where does this line of reasoning lead us? To the possibility that the UIUC Trustees will vote to appoint Salaita on September 11, throw Chancellor Wise under the bus (remember, the Executive Committee that upheld her decision is only comprised of three Trustees, not the full Board), and say it was all a misunderstanding wrought by an incompetent chancellor. Who'll then be pushed out within a year. The advantage of this approach is that it will effectively bring this story to a close. There will be angry donors, but everything I've ever read and experienced about that crew suggests that their bark is often worse than their bite. The ongoing atmosphere of crisis and ungovernability on campus is not something any university leader can bear for too long, and this threatens to go on for a very long time.
> 
> The other possibility is that the UIUC is thinking legally. One of the many weak links in their legal case was that Wise never forwarded Salaita's appointment to the Board of Trustees for a vote. She basically did a pocket veto. Salaita's offer letter stated that his appointment was subject to approval by the Board of Trustees, but Wise effectively never allowed the Board to approve or disapprove. So the UIUC's lawyers could have decided that the better thing to do would be simply to carry out the full deed.
> 
> Many questions remain. Stay tuned. Regardless of which interpretation is correct, we have to operate on the assumption that the first is a very real possibility and that we have a lot of work to do in the next ten days.
> 
> Corey Robin | September 1, 2014 at 10:36 pm | Tags: Israel/Palestine, Phyllis Wise, Steven Salaita, University of Illinois | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p1FPJG-1C5
> Comment	   See all comments
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20140901/ed68cf85/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list