[Peace-discuss] Another review of the film Selma

David Johnson davidjohnson1451 at comcast.net
Wed Jan 28 20:11:06 EST 2015


Expanding on Selma and the Politics of Martin Luther King Jr.

by Danny Haiphong

"In the final analysis, US imperialism controls the corporate media and the
survival of the ruling order is predicated on distortions of history."

I recently watched the Hollywood picture Selma to confirm whether or not the
movie was as progressive as many independent journalists made it out to be.
It wasn't. As usual, history was branded in the interests of the corporate
class behind the big screen. BAR editor Glen Ford laid out the historical
inaccuracies of the film last week. This week, I detail the ways in which
the politics of both King and the movement were derailed and defamed by the
corporate producers of Selma.

SNCC was demonized throughout the film. James Forman was painted as childish
and immature. Stokely Carmichael was nowhere to be found, nor were SNCC's
voter registration drives or grassroots work that drew King to Selma in the
first place. Black women, like Coretta Scott King, were relegated to
spectator roles. Malcolm X was given a few seconds of the film to plead to
Coretta Scott King that he had changed and was no longer hostile to the
"non-violent" actors in the movement. 

Selma not only minimized Malcolm and SNCC but also omitted key developments
of the period. The Johnson Administration was in the midst of an imperialist
war in Vietnam and understood it had to appease broad sections of the Black
Freedom Movement to win support. Washington calculated that the cost of war
was going to worsen the exploitation for oppressed people in the US. The
administration feared capitalist (and white supremacist) crisis would ignite
fire into the Black rebellions already underway and worked quickly to pass
legislation like the War on Poverty to stifle resistance. Johnson followed
up this up by doing what the Kennedy's had approved of in the prior
administration: reporting militant Black leaders to be exterminated
(including King) and replacing them with poverty-pimps and opportunists. 

It should come as no surprise that Selma concluded by promoting King as a
peaceful pacifist who led a movement that gave individual leaders like John
Lewis a seat at the table of US imperialism. This is typical Hollywood
practice. If Selma were true to historical reality, the film would show that
the so-called "non-violent" Black Freedom Movement was never without armed
self-defense. Black women armed themselves for protection against sexual
assaults by cops and the Klan and Black people protected their loved ones
from white supremacist terror. A popular example is Robert Williams and the
NAACP in Monroe, North Carolina. Williams organized a militia against white
terrorists backed by the FBI. This is a fundamental example of how
"non-violent" direct action wasn't antagonistic to the idea of self-defense.


"King was calling for a radical transformation of America's foundation by
1967."

Selma paints 1965 as a period dominated by the SCLC and those sympathetic to
its cause. While King's leadership carried a popular following, a
revolutionary movement was emerging from the influence of visionaries like
Malcolm X and Stokely Charmichael. The Black Liberation movement was born
from urban Black rebellions. Black confrontation with the state erupted
across the nation in response to the growing contradiction between the
promises of formal political rights and the actual conditions of Black
America. Black liberation movement and organizations like the Black Panther
Party for Self Defense would attempt to channel this discontent into
political struggle and revolutionary change. 

Selma completely evades the existence of the Black liberation movement.
Evasion cannot take away from how it was the Black liberation movement that
pushed Dr. King into a political direction Selma only briefly engages in the
film. In 1967, Dr. King denounced the Vietnam War. He called for an
immediate end to the war and for the start of a revolution against the
triple evils of materialism, racism, and militarism. Dr. King spent the rest
of his life after the Voting Rights Act organizing the Black working class
and fighting for the transformation of capitalist system.

At the time of his assassination, King was in Memphis helping organize
sanitation workers and the Poor People's Campaign. By this period, King had
already come to the conclusion that he could not condemn the armed
resistance of Black Americans when the US government was the "greatest
purveyor of violence on earth." He advocated for a universal living income
and the redirection of military expenditures to fund the policy. In his last
speech for the SCLC, King asked, " Why are there forty million poor people
in America? And when you begin to ask that question, you are raising
questions about the economic system, about broader distribution of wealth.
When you ask that question, you begin to question the capitalistic economy."
King was calling for a radical transformation of America's foundation by
1967, a life trajectory that runs in stark contradiction to his image as a
pacifist and reformist so repetitiously promoted by the US establishment.

 Dr. King wasn't a declared communist, but he was murdered because of the
radical challenge his ideas posed to war, racism, and capitalist
exploitation. The limitations of Selma lie not only in the omission of this
fact, but also in its narrow revision of history. The collective movement
for Black emancipation made Dr. King who he was. His political
transformation is a history lesson in and of itself. Dr. King's early
efforts taught the Black Freedom Movement important lessons on the true
character of US imperialism and racism. The limitations of integration and
political rights forced the Black Freedom movement to struggle deeply with
the question of power. This internal struggle is exactly what pushed King to
connect war, poverty, and racism together after he observed the rebellion in
Watts. 

"The limitations of Selma lie in its narrow revision of history."

Imperialist institutions like Hollywood cannot be expected to portray King's
radical transformation or the role the oppressed Black majority played in
bringing him there. In the final analysis, US imperialism controls the
corporate media and the survival of the ruling order is predicated on
distortions of history. When King was assassinated, his political trajectory
was antagonistic to imperialism. If he were alive in the 21st century, King
would denounce each and every imperialist intervention, bank bailout, and
police murder of Black people by the American imperialist state. He would
call into question why the richest 1 percent in the world will have more
wealth than the rest of the planet combined by 2016. King would declare a
state of emergency to the fact that half of public school children are in
poverty. And most importantly, he would make sure people understood that the
evils of racism, militarism, and materialism are alive and well in the US
prison gulag and every institution that determines Black life in America.

Selma is a disappointment to anyone who wants an honest synthesis of Dr.
King's politics or the historical period that shaped him. However, an
accurate narrative of history and politics under the conditions of
imperialism must be articulated by the oppressed themselves. Corporate
executives refuse to give a full depiction of the strengths and challenges
of SNCC, the Black Panther Party, Malcolm X or Dr. King for the same reason
that freedom fighters still languish in US prisons to this day. The Mumias,
Assatas, and Leonard Peltiers are too much of a threat to the imperialist
establishment to be awarded Hollywood films, even of the distorted type. The
task of the developing movement against racism and capitalism is to ensure
the true politics of Dr. King are a critical aspect of political
organization moving forward. As the Obama Administration winds down with
pitiful attempts to appease the masses with empty promises and reactionary
policies, it is our duty to reclaim the true Dr. King and history itself.

Danny Haiphong is an organizer for Fight Imperialism Stand Together (FIST)
in Boston. He is also a regular contributor to Black Agenda Report. Danny
can be reached at wakeupriseup1990 at gmail.com and FIST can be reached at
bostonfist at gmail.com.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20150128/c782b4aa/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list