[Peace-discuss] Killer Koh & Clinton's Emails Redux: Yale Law Mafia: 18 USC 371 v. Feddie Painter Vouches for Clinton's "ethics"
Boyle, Francis A
fboyle at illinois.edu
Sat Sep 3 16:39:48 UTC 2016
Wall Street Journal Editorial today:
"...She {Clinton} was almost surely trying to protect from public exposure {with her private email server} the intimate ties between State and the Clinton Foundation-the commingling of her political operation with her official business..." As I said, Killer Koh is part of Clinton's Conspiracy to Defraud the United States government in violation of 18 USC 371-at a minimum. Just a wonderful Role Model for the University of Illinois College of Law Faculty to have give their Endowed Lecture on The Role of Lawyers in Government Service on October 28 in order to get Clinton elected President on November 8 in violation of the Illinois Statute that prohibits the use of any University resources for such domestic electoral purposes-and they know it.
Fab
Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (phone)
217-244-1478 (fax)
(personal comments only)
From: Boyle, Francis A
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2016 7:41 AM
To: Amanda Bass <abass10 at gmail.com>; 'Karen Aram' <karenaram at hotmail.com>; 'C. G. Estabrook' <cge at shout.net>; 'C. G. Estabrook' <carl at newsfromneptune.com>; 'Peace Discuss' <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>; 'David Green' <davegreen84 at yahoo.com>; 'David Johnson' <davidjohnson1451 at comcast.net>; 'Stuart Levy' <stuartnlevy at gmail.com>; 'Karen Medina' <kmedina67 at gmail.com>; Szoke, Ron <r-szoke at illinois.edu>; 'Mildred O'brien' <moboct1 at aim.com>; 'Peace Discuss' <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>; 'peace at lists.chambana.net' <peace at lists.chambana.net>; 'davegreen84 at yahoo.com' <davegreen84 at yahoo.com>; Readel, Karin <kereadel at illinois.edu>; Estabrook, Carl G <galliher at illinois.edu>; 'Belden Fields' <a-fields at uiuc.edu>; 'jmachota at shout.net' <jmachota at shout.net>; 'Vietnam Veterans Against the War Mailing List' <vvawnet at prairienet.org>; 'Bryan Savage' <bryan at sneezingdogs.com>; Hoffman, Valerie J <vhoffman at illinois.edu>; Miller, Joseph Thomas <jtmiller at illinois.edu>; sherwoodross10 at gmail.com
Subject: Killer Koh & Clinton's Emails Redux: Yale Law Mafia: 18 USC 371 v. Feddie Painter Vouches for Clinton's "ethics"
On my WEFT interview last week I had mentioned I gave an extensive interview to Dennis Bernstein for Pacifica (including WEFT) on Clinton's email private server system pointing out that she had Committed the crime of Conspiracy to Defraud the United States Government in violation of 18 USC 371, which is a Felony. I was originally hired here to teach Criminal Law and did so for about 7-8 years.You can find the text and analysis of the Statute below taken from the US Attorneys' Manual itself. You can also find my response to a Yale Law Mafia Lawyer for Bush Jr defending Yale Law Mafia Clinton's "ethics". Yale Law Mafia Killer Koh admitted that he advised Clinton on her email systems. In other words, Killer Koh was part of Clinton's Conspiracy to Defraud the United States government in violation of 18 USC 371, which is a Felony. So of course the Yale Law Mafia, the Feddies, the Neo-Cons and the Clintonoids on the Faculty of the University of Illinois College of Law believe Killer Koh is the perfect role model for a Lawyer in Government Service to give an Endowed Lecture on that subject on October 28 while campaigning for Mrs Clinton to get elected President ten days later. PATHETIC! FAB.
Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (phone)
217-244-1478 (fax)
(personal comments only)
From: Boyle, Francis A [mailto:support at lists.aals.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:16 AM
To: SECTNS.aals at lists.aals.org<mailto:SECTNS.aals at lists.aals.org>
Subject: [SECTNS.aals] - Yale Law Mafia: 18 USC 371 v. Feddie Painter Vouches for Clinton's "ethics"
Obviously Feddie Painter studied "Criminal Law" and "Legal Ethics" at Yale Law School. And then he did Damage Control and Damage Limitation for Bush Jr at the White House. Now Feddie Painter is doing Damage Control and Damage Limitation for Hillary and Bill Clinton who also "studied" at Yale Law School. The Clintons' Yale Law Mafia in operation-along with Harold Killer Koh. Looks to me like Feddie Painter is gunning for a High Level Position in the President Mrs Clinton Yale Law Mafia Administration along with Killer Koh. Fab.
To the tables down at Mory's,
To the place where Louis dwells,
To the dear old Temple Bar
We love so well,
Sing the Whiffenpoofs assembled
With their glasses raised on high,
And the magic of their singing casts its spell.
Yes, the magic of their singing
Of the songs we love so well:
"Shall I Wasting" and "Mavourneen" and the rest.
We will serenade our Louis
While life and voice shall last
Then we'll pass and be forgotten with the rest.
We are poor little lambs
Who have lost our way.
Baa! Baa! Baa!
We are little black sheep
Who have gone astray.
Baa! Baa! Baa!
Gentlemen songsters off on a spree
Damned from here to eternity
God have mercy on such as we.
Baa! Baa! Baa!
Fab
Fab
Fab
Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (phone)
217-244-1478 (fax)
(personal comments only)
From: Boyle, Francis A
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 9:42 AM
To: 'SECTNS.aals at lists.aals.org' <SECTNS.aals at lists.aals.org<mailto:SECTNS.aals at lists.aals.org>>
Subject: 18 USC 371 v. Feddie Painter Vouches for Clinton's "ethics"
Skip to main content<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_criminal-2Dresource-2Dmanual-2D923-2D18-2Dusc-2D371-2Dconspiracy-2Ddefraud-2Dus-23main-2Dcontent&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=iejYo3ENryoLOGBPBx2JgMnuuAl1suDwiEqtOP2Lvwg&e=>
[Office of the United States Attorneys]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usao&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=u-SSShpBxxb9lORKMM_9fkCqx9wXoa87_nkpWuHR4WE&e=>[The United States Department of Justice]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=WFcsvKj4rxLU4psIsbvzH_Wz50XN3I8aH5vMxrpYJaY&e=>
[U.S. Attorneys]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=kDfSajTzJ60tEm_tnbGj2jeye9g3NMefhjYASQGXG_Y&e=>
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
U.S. Attorneys Manual
*
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
* Home<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_united-2Dstates-2Dattorneys-2Dmanual&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=FEBbOpcMF_sd_w2RTiHtE6i1EJwQUq37Fak2gCGVRyE&e=>
* Index<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_index&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=63JPdbsSma6ZWla8jFjwcsdC4gx1gfTIVbHe5EvsFXQ&e=>
* Search<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__search.justice.gov_search_docs-3Faffiliate-3Djustice-2Dusao-26dc-3D2365&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=WQKPL3teTBnw3eHY-dNyUp51_43vThSW_40FHZMM1uw&e=>
* U.S. Attorneys<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.justice.gov_usao&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=6cwFL86o8YznrzWTalOhhgeoJrThiyzD-M329pwssjc&e=>
U.S. Attorneys' Manual<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_united-2Dstates-2Dattorneys-2Dmanual&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=FEBbOpcMF_sd_w2RTiHtE6i1EJwQUq37Fak2gCGVRyE&e=>
You are here
U.S. Attorneys<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usao&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=u-SSShpBxxb9lORKMM_9fkCqx9wXoa87_nkpWuHR4WE&e=> » Resources<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usao_resources&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=42r9saNdwm7IecxDTPeCFUKXhfIpJUGKWyyFvAnMe7s&e=> » U.S. Attorneys' Manual<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_united-2Dstates-2Dattorneys-2Dmanual&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=FEBbOpcMF_sd_w2RTiHtE6i1EJwQUq37Fak2gCGVRyE&e=> » Criminal Resource Manual<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_criminal-2Dresource-2Dmanual&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=r_sKHvPdp2WRMBSMbpSY1gzcUkZFeKQ1gq7y3OnAIao&e=> » CRM 500-999<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_crm-2D500-2D999&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=Geuap0FaSCXbWRi3o21aYsgMqfoAG420kcNJqoPnn1Q&e=> » Criminal Resource Manual 901-999<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_criminal-2Dresource-2Dmanual-2D901-2D999&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=b4U-VbelyXn1j7tj03ANOeexUqZK4GP_9L4-BC-yQ9A&e=>
923. 18 U.S.C. § 371-Conspiracy to Defraud the United States
The general conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. § 371, creates an offense "[i]f two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose. (emphasis added). See Project, Tenth Annual Survey of White Collar Crime, 32 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 137, 379-406 (1995)(generally discussing § 371).
The operative language is the so-called "defraud clause," that prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States. This clause creates a separate offense from the "offense clause" in Section 371. Both offenses require the traditional elements of Section 371 conspiracy, including an illegal agreement, criminal intent, and proof of an overt act.
Although this language is very broad, cases rely heavily on the definition of "defraud" provided by the Supreme Court in two early cases, Hass v. Henkel, 216 U.S. 462 (1910), and Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182 (1924). In Hass the Court stated:
The statute is broad enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing or defeating the lawful function of any department of government . . . (A)ny conspiracy which is calculated to obstruct or impair its efficiency and destroy the value of its operation and reports as fair, impartial and reasonably accurate, would be to defraud the United States by depriving it of its lawful right and duty of promulgating or diffusing the information so officially acquired in the way and at the time required by law or departmental regulation.
Hass, 216 U.S. at 479-480. In Hammerschmidt, Chief Justice Taft, defined "defraud" as follows:
To conspire to defraud the United States means primarily to cheat the Government out of property or money, but it also means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest. It is not necessary that the Government shall be subjected to property or pecuniary loss by the fraud, but only that its legitimate official action and purpose shall be defeated by misrepresentation, chicane or the overreaching of those charged with carrying out the governmental intention.
Hammerschmidt, 265 U.S. at 188.
The general purpose of this part of the statute is to protect governmental functions from frustration and distortion through deceptive practices. Section 371 reaches "any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing or defeating the lawful function of any department of Government." Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107, 128 (1987); see Dennis v. United States, 384 U.S. 855 (1966). The "defraud part of section 371 criminalizes any willful impairment of a legitimate function of government, whether or not the improper acts or objective are criminal under another statute." United States v. Tuohey, 867 F.2d 534, 537 (9th Cir. 1989).
The word "defraud" in Section 371 not only reaches financial or property loss through use of a scheme or artifice to defraud but also is designed and intended to protect the integrity of the United States and its agencies, programs and policies. United States v. Burgin, 621 F.2d 1352, 1356 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1015 (1980); see United States v. Herron, 825 F.2d 50, 57-58 (5th Cir.); United States v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 708 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 (1979). Thus, proof that the United States has been defrauded under this statute does not require any showing of monetary or proprietary loss. United States v. Conover, 772 F.2d 765 (11th Cir. 1985), aff'd, sub. nom. Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987); United States v. Del Toro, 513 F.2d 656 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 826 (1975); United States v. Jacobs, 475 F.2d 270 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 821 (1973).
Thus, if the defendant and others have engaged in dishonest practices in connection with a program administered by an agency of the Government, it constitutes a fraud on the United States under Section 371. United States v. Gallup, 812 F.2d 1271, 1276 (10th Cir. 1987); Conover, 772 F.2d at 771. In United States v. Hopkins, 916 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1990), the defendants' actions in disguising contributions were designed to evade the Federal Election Commission's reporting requirements and constituted fraud on the agency under Section 371.
The intent required for a conspiracy to defraud the government is that the defendant possessed the intent (a) to defraud, (b) to make false statements or representations to the government or its agencies in order to obtain property of the government, or that the defendant performed acts or made statements that he/she knew to be false, fraudulent or deceitful to a government agency, which disrupted the functions of the agency or of the government. It is sufficient for the government to prove that the defendant knew the statements were false or fraudulent when made. The government is not required to prove the statements ultimately resulted in any actual loss to the government of any property or funds, only that the defendant's activities impeded or interfered with legitimate governmental functions. See United States v. Puerto, 730 F.2d 627 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 847 (1984); United States v. Tuohey, 867 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1989); United States v. Sprecher, 783 F. Supp. 133, 156 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)(þit is sufficient that the defendant engaged in acts that interfered with or obstructed a lawful governmental function by deceit, craft, trickery or by means that were dishonest"), modified on other grounds, 988 F.2d 318 (2d Cir. 1993).
In United States v. Madeoy, 912 F.2d 1486 (D.C. Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1105 (1991), the defendants were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the government and other offenses in connection with a scheme to fraudulently obtain loan commitments from the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Veterans Administration (VA). The court held that the district court had properly instructed the jury that:
the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of a scheme or artifice to defraud, with the objective either of defrauding the FHA or the VA of their lawful right to conduct their business and affairs free from deceit, fraud or misrepresentation, or of obtaining money and property from the FHA by means of false and fraudulent representations and promises which the defendant knew to be false.
Madeoy, 912 F.2d at 1492.
Prosecutors considering charges under the defraud prong of Section 371, and the offense prong of Section 371 should be aware of United States v. Minarik, 875 F.2d 1186 (6th Cir. 1989) holding limited, 985 F.2d 962 (1993), and related cases. See United States v. Arch Trading Company, 987 F.2d 1087 (4th Cir. 1993). In Minarik, the prosecution was found to have "used the defraud clause in a way that created great confusion about the conduct claimed to be illegal," and the conviction was reversed. 875 F.2d at 1196. After Minarik, defendants have frequently challenged indictments charging violations of both clauses, although many United States Courts of Appeals have found it permissible to invoke both clauses of Section 371. Arch Trading Company, 987 F.2d at 1092 (collecting cases); see also United States v. Licciardi, 30 F.3d 1127, 1132-33 (9th Cir. 1994)(even though the defendant may have impaired a government agency's functions, as part of a scheme to defraud another party, the government offered no evidence that the defendant intended to defraud the United States and a conspiracy to violate an agency regulatory scheme could not lie on such facts).
In summary, those activities which courts have held defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371 affect the government in at least one of three ways:
[cited in USAM 9-42.001<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_usam-2D9-2D42000-2Dfraud-2Dagainst-2Dthe-2Dgovernment-239-2D42.001&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=F7djvKKgYYhtW6HW6YIfuUifmF-YLBI8vujm9k71dqM&e=>]
1. They cheat the government out of money or property;
2. They interfere or obstruct legitimate Government activity; or
3. They make wrongful use of a governmental instrumentality.
< 922. Elements of 18 U.S.C. § 287<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_criminal-2Dresource-2Dmanual-2D922-2Delements-2D18-2Dusc-2D287&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=Q-FPhcce80r86rco8UM4KB4IeJFdB_JAEH_kjE_gQ5g&e=>up<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_criminal-2Dresource-2Dmanual-2D901-2D999&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=b4U-VbelyXn1j7tj03ANOeexUqZK4GP_9L4-BC-yQ9A&e=>924. Defrauding the Government of Money or Property ><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_criminal-2Dresource-2Dmanual-2D924-2Ddefrauding-2Dgovernment-2Dmoney-2Dor-2Dproperty&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=WbKLkHkYMfiT4xMs-WGqzrmz-OWynt7RezWVutnn8us&e=>
Updated December 18, 2015
U.S. Attorneys Manual
* Home<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_united-2Dstates-2Dattorneys-2Dmanual&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=FEBbOpcMF_sd_w2RTiHtE6i1EJwQUq37Fak2gCGVRyE&e=>
* Index<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usam_index&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=63JPdbsSma6ZWla8jFjwcsdC4gx1gfTIVbHe5EvsFXQ&e=>
* Search<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__search.justice.gov_search_docs-3Faffiliate-3Djustice-2Dusao-26dc-3D2365&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=WQKPL3teTBnw3eHY-dNyUp51_43vThSW_40FHZMM1uw&e=>
* U.S. Attorneys<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.justice.gov_usao&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=6cwFL86o8YznrzWTalOhhgeoJrThiyzD-M329pwssjc&e=>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
* Left
o Site Map<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.justice.gov_sitemap&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=Fm-796aTx11rd7b5rvYtHSyqnGbvlXyeRU3m9v6sBsM&e=>
§ Accessibility<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_usao_accessibility&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=-AeVMlAHTRtYUmB7m_QaPQdsoZKZ5EjIbS9XUQx7BZ4&e=>
§ FOIA<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.justice.gov_usao_resources_&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=f1lRCVU5MyOa1v1NeIozqdbkhwllCar93t-b9MCN0-k&e=>
§ Privacy Policy<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_doj_privacy-2Dpolicy&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=5n7rprkNHdUo4autClYjIyG6sqeNH2lCVftQ6QM7R2k&e=>
§ Legal Policies & Disclaimers<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_legalpolicies&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=Jv-bhzK1y9EFhKn8KcUKoZhrkTvUQWE458vpDSJ92dU&e=>
* Right
§ Justice.gov<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.justice.gov_&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=WFcsvKj4rxLU4psIsbvzH_Wz50XN3I8aH5vMxrpYJaY&e=>
§ USA.gov<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.usa.gov_&d=CwMFAw&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=iioab8BLQ6IJxt-3gLhYzf1aAvTbGVgzPJj9W_0ugn0&m=ue5U97D9BdcQo5iOTzS1VAP1k-dmsekZfKgv9iHx3ws&s=itP-Z6Rd5SzKuUqIYGoXaZ9TpLrIR3fXOZOxx4-_6gQ&e=>
Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (phone)
217-244-1478 (fax)
(personal comments only)
From: Boyle, Francis A
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 9:26 AM
To: SECTNS.aals at lists.aals.org<mailto:SECTNS.aals at lists.aals.org>
Subject: NYT: Feddie Painter Vouches for Clinton's "ethics"
"When I was the chief White House ethics {sic!} lawyer {sic!} for President George W. Bush..."
LOLOLOL! Are we supposed to take this seriously? Bush Jr and "legal ethics? An oxymoron to be sure. As was and still is Bush Jr.'s "ethics lawyer." Fab.
Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (phone)
217-244-1478 (fax)
(personal comments only)
________________________________
________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20160903/65ecbd79/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2479 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20160903/65ecbd79/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2979 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20160903/65ecbd79/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 9676 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20160903/65ecbd79/attachment-0005.jpg>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list