[Peace-discuss] [Prairiegreens] Women's March

[CindyMann]

You're saying that you don't think Trump's offense is real? That he is
putting on an act? While it does often seem to me that there is a great
deal of insincerity in his behavior, it's also hard to fathom what his
purpose in this act would be. But, I'm not him, and I guess only time will
tell. I hope time doesn't also see a lot of damage from him and the people
he is appointing.

C.





On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:43 PM, E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag> wrote:

> I'm not convinced by the feigned offense.
>
> Chico (pronounced chick-o) Marx was at least as crass as Trump and
> everyone thinks he is a traditional gentleman (or so I am told)... and no
> one much complains about Brad Pitt's outbursts...at least I dont hear of it
> much.
>
> The offense is seems far too contrived to be real...
>
> Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
>
> ---- CindyMann wrote ----
>
>
> As someone going to a march, my concern is for everyone. That callous
> rhetoric is dehumanizing, for everyone. It does matter. So is the sexual
> abuse and defense of predation he has displayed. Many people are going for
> that.
>
> C.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Karen Aram <karenaram at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The President is unlikely to have an impact on Roe vs. Wade, however
>> those he has appointed may.  Of course this has been an ongoing project for
>> some time, with the closing down of Planned Parenthood Clinics, under the
>> Obama Presidency
>>
>> While the march is focusing on several issues, some of which I support,
>> there is almost no concern being shown for the thousands, millions of women
>> killed as a result of US wars. What seems to be bringing on the crowds is
>> concern over the “glass ceiling” and “callous rhetoric”.
>>
>> One can hope that those women going to DC, who are concerned with the
>> lives of non American women being slaughtered along with their children by
>> the USG, will have an opportunity to speak or engage, in the enlightenment
>> of others.
>>
>> > On Jan 19, 2017, at 16:53, E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag> wrote:
>> >
>> > It is feared that Donald Trump will turn back Roe v. Wade.  Abortion is
>> instituted as a national eugenics program but it is popularized
>> successfully as a women's rights issue.
>> >
>> > Those is power who were not interested in the esoteric points of
>> genetics were swayed by the prospect of having their peccadillos managed
>> medically at the expense of the state.
>> >
>> > Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
>> >
>> > ---- Karen Aram wrote ----
>> >
>> >> Nice, but what is the issue, and why women, yes I know men can go to
>> if they support women.
>> >> What is meant by support?
>> >> Any mention of the deaths of women occurring in Somalia? They are
>> women, women and children being starved, two million already dead due to
>> air strikes for which our government, current government, meaning Obama
>> presidency, is responsible for supporting. Supporting with weapons,
>> training, logistics, all of that which the Saudi’s lack.
>> >> Ten thousand in dire circumstances now.
>> >>
>> >> Human Rights Watch NYC.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> On Jan 19, 2017, at 08:34, C. G. Estabrook <cge at shout.net> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> A close friend who's going to the Women's March in DC (about which
>> I'd expressed hesitation) says of the following,
>> >>>
>> >>> "One CW thinking about women's march. As close as I've seen to how I
>> think about it and other ways I've been spending my time these days. And
>> more Marian than I'd realized til I read this."
>> >>>
>> >>> https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/standing-mary-foot-cross
>> >>>
>> >>> --CGE
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Prairiegreens mailing list
>> >>> Prairiegreens at lists.chambana.net
>> >>> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/prairiegreens
>> >>> http://www.prairienet.org/greens/
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Prairiegreens mailing list
>> >> Prairiegreens at lists.chambana.net
>> >> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/prairiegreens
>> >> http://www.prairienet.org/greens/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Prairiegreens mailing list
>> Prairiegreens at lists.chambana.net
>> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/prairiegreens
>> http://www.prairienet.org/greens/
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20170119/d1b2cb3f/attachment-0001.html>