[Peace-discuss] [Peace] Immigration Ban Is Unlikely to Reduce Terrorist Threat, Experts Say

[Carl G. Estabrook]

This strikes me as neocon nattering from the NYT.

But Caitlin Johnstone points out why that may be OK: <http://www.newslogue.com/debate/311/CaitlinJohnstone <http://www.newslogue.com/debate/311/CaitlinJohnstone>>.

—CGE


> On Jan 30, 2017, at 11:47 PM, Dianna Visek via Peace <peace at lists.chambana.net> wrote:
> 
> This is a very interesting, factual article about what anti-terrorism experts think about Trump's ban:
> 
> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/28/us/politics/a-sweeping-order-unlikely-to-reduce-terrorist-threat.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=b-lede-package-region%C2%AEion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&utm_source=Chicago%20Sun-Times&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1686701_MorningEdition013017&ID=1686701_MorningEdition013017&dm_i=2JCP,105GT,6JQ0L2,2WS4A,1&_r=0 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.nytimes.com_2017_01_28_us_politics_a-2Dsweeping-2Dorder-2Dunlikely-2Dto-2Dreduce-2Dterrorist-2Dthreat.html-3Fhp-26action-3Dclick-26pgtype-3DHomepage-26clickSource-3Dstory-2Dheading-26module-3Db-2Dlede-2Dpackage-2Dregion-25C2-25AEion-3Dtop-2Dnews-26WT.nav-3Dtop-2Dnews-26utm-5Fsource-3DChicago-2520Sun-2DTimes-26utm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fcampaign-3D1686701-5FMorningEdition013017-26ID-3D1686701-5FMorningEdition013017-26dm-5Fi-3D2JCP-2C105GT-2C6JQ0L2-2C2WS4A-2C1-26-5Fr-3D0&d=DwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=tfHzwZBcTLEveiewRiq0OdhFmfRmlvZjpIBS0AUJ2v0&m=NykakOCvI9VhK3Ln6YNkcuCscdJ2FTfk0LbQCw0NI1Y&s=CkbLbW8cPkqoEXv7ApawWKFxsRKtkswschdGKRl3e3A&e=>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peace mailing list
> Peace at lists.chambana.net
> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20170131/6fe2c4fd/attachment-0001.html>