[Peace-discuss] More Chinese "soft power"

Mon May 15 19:31:58 UTC 2017

It’s actually $5 trillion. And American companies getting a “piece” of the action might mean “peace," instead of the US usual war.

See below:

[Honour guards march before a welcoming ceremony ahead of the Belt and Road forum at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, on May 13. Photo: Reuters]
Honour guards march before a welcoming ceremony ahead of the Belt and Road forum at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, on May 13. Photo: Reuters
CHINA<http://www.atimes.com/tag/china/>BELT AND ROAD FORUM<http://www.atimes.com/tag/belt-and-road-forum/>OPINION
Peace, harmony and happiness, plus a deluge of yuan
Inclusive globalization, win-win global trade, Made in China 2025 ... President Xi uses Belt and Road Forum to explain how sprawling trade initiative will change China and the world
By PEPE ESCOBAR<http://www.atimes.com/writer/pepe-escobar/> MAY 15, 2017 2:48 AM (UTC+8)

  *   <https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fati.ms%2FowCULI>
  *   <https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Peace%2C+harmony+and+happiness%2C+plus+a+deluge+of+yuan&url=http%3A%2F%2Fati.ms%2FowCULI&via=asiatimesonline>
  *   <https://www.linkedin.com/cws/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fati.ms%2FowCULI>
  *
  *   <mailto:?subject=AsiaTimes:%20Peace,%20harmony%20and%20happiness,%20plus%20a%20deluge%20of%20yuan&body=I%20found%20this%20on%20AsiaTimes%20and%20thought%20it%20might%20interest%20you:%20http%3A%2F%2Fati.ms%2FowCULI>
  *   4,212<http://www.atimes.com/article/peace-harmony-happiness-plus-deluge-rmb/?utm_source=The+Daily+Brief&utm_campaign=594bc18f3a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_15&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1f8bca137f-594bc18f3a-31498881#>
  *   26<http://www.atimes.com/article/peace-harmony-happiness-plus-deluge-rmb/?utm_source=The+Daily+Brief&utm_campaign=594bc18f3a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_15&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1f8bca137f-594bc18f3a-31498881#comments>

President Xi Jinping, in his keynote speech that opened the two-day Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation in Beijing, did his best to explain the future of the New Silk Roads.

Xi said that the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) – that what was once “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) – is a multilateral project set to bring “peace, harmony and happiness” across Eurasia by “strategically connecting” nations as diverse as Russia, Mongolia, Turkey and Vietnam through development plans that are already operational. And, he added, they will be a success because extra funds are already on their way.

THE DAILYBrief

Must-reads from across Asia - directly to your inbox

Xi told his audience, that included Russian President Vladimir Putin, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte and a host of other world leaders and top ranking officials, that he had proposed an additional RMB 780 billion (approximately US$113 billion) to be disbursed through multiple sources.

These include the Silk Road Fund; the China Development Bank; the Export and Import Bank of China and also overseas capital provided by Chinese banks. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is not part – at least not yet – of this proposed package.

That’s still a long way towards fulfilling Asia’s gargantuan infrastructure needs – estimated to be at least $5 trillion up to 2022.

Economic logic certainly points to connectivity between Asia and Europe compressing as mutual trade multiplies. Italy and the UK are already enthusiastic supporters of OBOR/BRI. As too are Germany’s industrialists.

[China's route through Pakistan to the Arabian Sea. Image: Agence France-Presse]
China’s route through Pakistan to the Arabian Sea. Image: Agence France-Presse

Significantly, before the summit, Xi was in a phone call with new French President Emmanuel Macron, who took power this Sunday. Xi not only offered the requisite support for EU integration; he encouraged Macron to buy into the New Silk Roads – which are not exactly understood in France’s business and media – as part of a unified EU strategy.

There’s no question that this massive attempt at infrastructure building – pipelines, ports, roads, high-speed rail, fiber-optic cables – that aims to unify Eurasia into a seamless trade emporium is the definitive 21st century geoeconomic/geopolitical project.

OBOR/BRI will configure Globalization Mark II, or which Xi in Davos defined as “inclusive globalization”.

Which is really the same as interpreting OBOR/BRI as “de-Americanized globalization”<http://stories.cnas.org/connectivity-and-strategy-a-response-to-robert-kaplan>.

And OBOR/BRI will certainly act as an essential component of Xi’s Made in China 2025 strategy and the now central aspirational “Chinese Dream” concept. The initiative has become the trade/economic foreign policy arm of Xi’s drive to move China into the status of a “moderately affluent” society.

What Xi is aiming at during the Beijing summit is to address two key but controversial points. How China proposes to finance OBOR/BRI. And how to build a consensus that this is a Eurasia-wide “win-win” operation.

About that black or white cat

New Silk Road activity is already frantic. Take the China-Europe Railway Express for for instance. It spans 51 different rail links with freight trains already connecting 27 Chinese and 28 European cities. There’s also a planned rail line between China and Laos and a high-speed rail between Yunnan province in China and Thailand. In Malaysia there is Kuantan port industrial park and aluminium and palm oil processing. In Turkey three state-owned Chinese companies are turning the country’s third largest port, Kumport, into a key OBOR/BRI node.

Among all these myriad projects, arguably the most ambitious is the US$46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). It’s a complex network of roads, rail, oil/gas pipelines, ports, airports and special economic zones linking Xinjiang to Gwadar port in Balochistan and is first New Silk Road project to get direct investment from the Silk Road Fund.

In November 2016, an upgraded and extended Karakoram highway linked this Arabian Sea port with the ancient Chinese silk road of Kashgar.

As Xi has stressed, China, beyond CPEC, will get even closer, geopolitically, to Pakistan under the framework of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

Cue to India throwing tantrums – and then sending a low-level delegation to the Beijing summit.

That could be said to be counterproductive because China and India’s development strategies are not mutually exclusive. India is the second largest shareholder of the AIIB, after China and both China and India are equal partners in the New Development Bank (NDB) – the BRICS bank – which is not directly implicated in financing OBOR/BRI projects.

And most of all China and India are both members of the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM-EC); that has the aim of – what else – economic development. BCIM-EC could either become a branch of OBOR/BRI or proceed as a stand-alone mechanism, with equal voice by all members.

So to upgrade Deng Xiaoping. “It doesn’t matter if the New Silk Road cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice”. And catching mice in the 21st century means Eurasia integration.

  *   <https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fati.ms%2FowCULI>
  *   <https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Peace%2C+harmony+and+happiness%2C+plus+a+deluge+of+yuan&url=http%3A%2F%2Fati.ms%2FowCULI&via=asiatimesonline>
  *   <https://www.linkedin.com/cws/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fati.ms%2FowCULI>
  *   <mailto:?subject=AsiaTimes:%20Peace,%20harmony%20and%20happiness,%20plus%20a%20deluge%20of%20yuan&body=I%20found%20this%20on%20AsiaTimes%20and%20thought%20it%20might%20interest%20you:%20http%3A%2F%2Fati.ms%2FowCULI>

On May 15, 2017, at 11:48, Szoke, Ron via Peace-discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net<mailto:peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>> wrote:

U.S. Companies Court Chinese Infrastructure Spending
New York Times  DealBook 5/15/17
By Sei Chong

China plans a $1 trillion spending spree to invest in infrastructure all over the world in an initiative called “One Belt, One Road.” The money has not yet been earmarked, but American companies are already looking at ways to get a piece of the action.
For example, Citibank won a contract last month to handle a $3 billion bond offering from Bank of China, which aims to use the money to open branches across Asia, Eastern Europe and East Africa.
A big hurdle to winning bids though, is China’s preference for its own companies.
One way for American companies to increase their chances would be to increase manufacturing in China, not in the United States, to satisfy Beijing’s requirements that some of the work be done locally.
James Zimmerman, a former chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, is skeptical that non-Chinese companies can benefit from the spending. “Tell us what we are going to get out of this,” he said, referring to the West. “It’s a nonstarter if it’s all about bringing Chinese goods to Europe, or if it’s all one way.”
# # #

_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net<mailto:Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20170515/284eb778/attachment-0001.html>