[Peace-discuss] FW: Why the Russian Double-Agent Skripal Could Not Have Been Poisoned with “Novichok” | Washington's Blog

Boyle, Francis A fboyle at illinois.edu
Mon Apr 9 00:36:36 UTC 2018



Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (phone)
217-244-1478 (fax)
(personal comments only)

-----Original Message-----
From: Boyle, Francis A 
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2018 7:36 PM
To: sectns.aals at lists.aals.org
Subject: Why the Russian Double-Agent Skripal Could Not Have Been Poisoned with “Novichok” | Washington's Blog

http://washingtonsblog.com/2018/04/why-the-russian-double-agent-skripal-could-not-have-been-poisoned-with-novichok.html
Why is this important?

Washington’s Blog spoke with two experts on chemical weapons to find out if the facts on the ground bear out the claim that the military nerve agent Novichok was used.

Initially, the man who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, Francis Boyle – Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois, Champaign, with a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University – told Washington’s Blog:


If this had been military grade nerve agent, the Skripals, the first responder policeman, and many others in the town of Salisbury where the Brits say it was spread around, would have been dead almost immediately. Yet Yulia is now apparently recovering. How did they get over to the park from their home when they should have been dead on the doorstep from contacting the agent on the doorknob?

And, Captain Doug Rokke – former Director of the U.S. Army’s Depleted Uranium Project and an expert on chemical weapons, with a PhD in health physics – told Washington’s Blog:


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list