[Peace-discuss] Tariq Ali speaks at UIUC this Thursday

kmedina67 kmedina67 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 18:01:41 UTC 2018


That the sound speakers were not even turned on, and the person who controlled then wad sitting in the front row, is shameful. And the size of the room was far too small.

Karen Medina

-------- Original message --------From: "Brussel, Morton K via Peace-discuss" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> Date: 3/30/18  12:15  (GMT-06:00) To: David Green <davidgreen50 at gmail.com> Cc: Peace-discuss List <Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Tariq Ali speaks at UIUC this Thursday 

Just to note that Tariq Ali was rather cavalier, disappointing, with respect to the dangers of a nuclear confrontation/war, and sanguine (bad word) with respect to war in general. He made just a mention about Korea, nothing that I can recall regarding Syria/Palestine-Israel
 or Iran.  The words war/militarism were downplayed or not mentioned in his presentation. 



He knocked Putin, but allowed his adroitness in foreign policy, was pessimistic about South America, compared Norway’s use of oil wealth to Venezuala’s (albeit the situations between the two are/were radically different). 




Perhaps there wasn't enough time to go into all of that. He was mostly interested in the nature of revolutions, past and present. 



It was an impressive presentation, nonetheless. 



I couldn’t hear well much of what he said…



—mkb




On Mar 30, 2018, at 12:25 AM, David Green via Peace-discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> wrote:




Ali's analysis of the Russian Revolution diverges from Chomsky in that Chomsky argues that the April Theses were public relations, was as Ali sees them in a more authentic light.



Ali called Trump a "shithole" for what it's worth (although mainly for laughs), cutting him no slack as Caitlin Johnstone is inclined to do. That is, no analysis of populism/nationalism in any positive sense from Ali.



On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Carl G. Estabrook via Peace-discuss
<peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> wrote:


We certainly don’t want subscribers to an AWARE mail list to know what you think.








On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:14 PM, kmedina67 via Peace-discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> wrote:








 My apologies. 
I was writing from my cell phone; I did not notice that the email was cc'd to peace. Drat. I really tried NOT to send it to peace. 



Also apologies for the mis-spellings. Auto- correct is sneaky at changing my words. 
- Karen Medina













_______________________________________________

Peace-discuss mailing list

Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net

https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss











_______________________________________________

Peace-discuss mailing list

Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net

https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss








_______________________________________________

Peace-discuss mailing list

Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net

https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss








-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20180330/78f4f712/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list