[Peace-discuss] FW: Ten Irrefutable, Devastating 9/11 Facts

David Johnson davidjohnson1451 at comcast.net
Mon Jan 7 18:40:37 UTC 2019 

 

 

 


Ten Irrefutable, Devastating 9/11 Facts


 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/ten-irrefutable-devastating-911-facts/5637525


 
<https://www.globalresearch.ca/ten-irrefutable-devastating-911-facts/5637525
> Image removed by sender.

 
<https://www.globalresearch.ca/ten-irrefutable-devastating-911-facts/5637525
> Ten Irrefutable, Devastating 9/11 Facts - Global ResearchGlobal Research -
Centre for Research on Globalization

There is actually no need to resort to speculative arguments that the
official account of 9/11 is a fraud since there are hard facts that support
this conclusion. Here are 10 such undisputed facts.

www.globalresearch.ca

 

 

By  <https://www.globalresearch.ca/author/elias-davidsson> Elias Davidsson
and  <https://www.globalresearch.ca/author/craig-mckee> Craig McKee

Global Research, January 06, 2019

Global Research 2 April 2018

Region:  <https://www.globalresearch.ca/region/usa> USA

Theme:  <https://www.globalresearch.ca/theme/intelligence> Intelligence,
<https://www.globalresearch.ca/theme/media-disinformation> Media
Disinformation,  <https://www.globalresearch.ca/theme/9-11-war-on-terrorism>
Terrorism

In-depth Report:
<https://www.globalresearch.ca/indepthreport/prosecute-bush-cheney>
Prosecute Bush/Cheney

 
<https://www.globalresearch.ca/ten-irrefutable-devastating-911-facts/5637525
?print=1> Image removed by sender.

Image removed by sender.

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above  

This incisive article was originally published on GR in April 2018.

Scholars who attempt to elucidate the crime perpetrated on 9/11 – who are
commonly referred to as 9/11 truthers – are often criticized for relying on
conjecture and speculation in support of their claims. Such criticism may at
times be justified, though often made in bad faith. There is actually no
need to resort to speculative arguments that the official account of 9/11 is
a fraud since there are hard facts that support this conclusion. Here are 10
such undisputed facts:

1. U.S. authorities have failed to trace, arrest, try (prosecute), and
punish anyone responsible for the crime against humanity committed on 9/11.

The mass murder committed on September 11, 2001 represents, under
international law, a crime against humanity. The State where it was
committed – in this case the United States of America – bears the obligation
to the international community to trace, arrest, try, and punish individuals
responsible for that crime.

Since 2002, U.S. authorities admit they have detained a handful of persons
at Guantánamo Bay who are accused of helping to orchestrate 9/11. Their
identities remain in doubt; their alleged confessions were made behind
closed doors; and their trial by a military court does not fulfill minimal
international norms of due process.

U.S. authorities claim to have sentenced Zacarias Moussaoui to life
imprisonment for not having warned the FBI about the preparations for 9/11,
an allegation he denied. No evidence was presented that he was involved in
the preparations for 9/11 or knew anything about these preparations. No
evidence was presented that he even knew the alleged hijackers. U.S.
authorities also claim to hold, since 2003, a man by the name of Khalid
Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) in Guantánamo who allegedly confessed to have
masterminded 9/11 and more than 30 other terrorist operations. He also
allegedly confessed to having planned an attack on a bank in Washington
State that did not exist until after he was already in Guantánamo. The man,
whose identity remains murky and whose connection to 9/11 is limited to what
he said in his ludicrous confession, has not been prosecuted, let alone
sentenced. No one seriously expects him to be ever brought to trial, let
alone a trial fulfilling international norms.

2. When announcing to the United Nations their decision to attack
Afghanistan, U.S. authorities failed to provide evidence that the crime of
9/11 was in any way connected to Afghanistan. In fact, such evidence has
still not been produced.

See the letter from U.S. Representative John Negroponte to the President of
the UN Security Council, October 7, 2001 (mirrored
<http://www.aldeilis.net/fake/569.pdf> here).

3. The United States government did not authorize an investigation of the
events of 9/11 that could have fulfilled minimal international standards:
The 9/11 Commission was neither independent nor impartial, and its
investigation was neither thorough nor transparent.

Regarding minimal standards of investigation, see Elias Davidsson, “The
Events of 11 September 2001 and the Right to the Truth.” (See
<https://www.scribd.com/document/59150870/Right-to-the-Truth> this or
<http://aldeilis.net/terror/1918.pdf> this)

4. Despite vilifying Osama bin Laden as a terrorist leader, judicial
authorities in the United States have failed to charge him in connection
with 9/11. He was not even wanted in connection with this crime.

The FBI admitted in June 2006 that it possesses no concrete evidence linking
Osama bin Laden to 9/11. (See: Ed Haas, “FBI says, it has no ‘hard evidence
connecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” Information Clearing House, June 18, 2006,
mirrored  <http://www.aldeilis.net/fake/853.pdf> here)

5. Authorities in the United States have failed to produce clear and
convincing evidence that the 19 persons named by the FBI as 9/11 hijackers
even boarded aircraft that they are alleged to have subsequently hijacked. 

To be precise: U.S. authorities have failed to produce authenticated
passenger lists that would include the names of the alleged hijackers;
witnesses who saw these alleged hijackers in the airports or boarding the
aircraft; authenticated security-camera videos proving their presence in the
airports of departure; and DNA identification of these individuals’ bodily
remains (see detailed analysis in Elias Davidsson, Hijacking America’s Mind
on 9/11 [Algora Publishers, New York, 2013], Chapter 2).

6. U.S. authorities have failed to produce clear and convincing evidence
that passenger airliners crashed at the known landmarks on 9/11.

The FBI admitted in a letter to the Nevada District U.S. Court on March 14,
2008, signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick A. Rose, that records
detailing the collection and positive identification of the wreckage of the
crashed aircraft do not exist (Letter mirrored
<http://www.aldeilis.net/fake/1083.pdf> here). He thus admitted that the FBI
failed to formally identify the wreckage found at the various crash sites as
belonging to the allegedly hijacked aircraft. It is, therefore, not
established that the allegedly hijacked aircraft crashed at these locations.

7. U.S. authorities have failed to explain why more than 1,100 persons, who
were present at the World Trade Center on 9/11, vanished into thin air.

Vast parts of the Twin Towers were literally pulverized as can be seen from
video recordings, photos, and testimonies. Of more than 1,100 missing
persons, not a single tooth, nail, or bone has been found as of 2011 (See,
inter alia, Anemona Hartocollis, “Connecting with lost loved ones, if only
by the tips of fingers,” The New York Times, September 11, 2011 [mirrored
<http://www.aldeilis.net/fake/616.pdf> here]). U.S. authorities have never
explained what could have caused more than 1,100 persons to vanish without
leaving a trace. They bear the obligation, under human rights law, to
determine the reason for such disappearances.

8. U.S. authorities compensated families of 9/11 victims that agreed to
waive their right to further court action. The compensation exceeded by at
least seven times what was paid to the families of firefighters who died in
rescue operations on 9/11.

The families of 9/11 victims received from the U.S. Compensation Fund,
established in October 2001, an average of $2.1 million if they agreed to
waive their right to engage in civil proceedings (see, inter alia, Brian
Bernbaum, “9/11 Fund Chief Faults Payments,” CBS News, 4.9.2003 [mirrored
<http://www.aldeilis.net/terror/951.pdf> here]). As of 2013, spouses of
firefighters who die in line of duty can obtain $333,605 under the Public
Safety Officers’ Benefits (PSOB) Act (42 U.S.C. 3796). The figure for 2001
was undoubtedly lower. The 95 families, who did not apply to the
Compensation Fund and preferred to let courts determine their rights,
obtained an average of $5.5 million in out-of-court settlements (see, Ashby
Jones, “The 9/11 Victim Settlements: A Chat with Skadden’s Sheila Birnbaum,”
The Wall Street Journal, 13.3.2009 [mirrored
<http://www.aldeilis.net/terror/959.pdf> here]).

9. U.S. authorities have failed to explain the effect of numerous military
drills conducted on the morning of 9/11 – including the simulation of
aircraft hijackings – on the commission of the mass murder.

Military drills caused confusion and surprised military and civilian
personnel responsible for air traffic, as reported in U.S. media. For
example, NORAD Major General Larry Arnold said that, “By the end of the day,
we had twenty-one aircraft identified as possible hijackings.” (See, Eric
Hehs, “Conversation with Major General Larry Arnold,” One Magazine, January
2002 [mirrored  <http://www.aldeilis.net/fake/1052.pdf> here]). Colonel
Robert Marr, NEADS battle commander, said he had been told that across the
nation there were “29 different reports of hijackings.” (See, Robert A.
Baker, “Commander of 9/11 Air Defenses Retires,” Newhouse News Service,
March 31, 2005 [mirrored  <http://www.aldeilis.net/fake/1049.pdf> here]).
U.S. authorities failed to explain how these drills affected the commission
of the crime, including the apparent failure to intercept hijacked aircraft.

10. U.S. authorities promoted numerous officials who, according to the
official account on 9/11, had failed to carry out their duties with regard
to 9/11. Not a single person has been held accountable anywhere in
government for what went wrong on or prior to 9/11.

Here are few examples: Richard Myers, in charge of the Pentagon on 9/11, was
promoted to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on October 1, 2001; Ralph
Eberhart, in charge of NORAD on 9/11, was promoted to head the new “Northern
Command” a year after 9/11; Captain Charles J. Leidig, acting NMCC Director
on 9/11, was promoted in 2004 to the rank of admiral; Brigadier General
Montague Winfield, who on 9/11 was in charge of the National Military
Command Center (NMCC), was promoted in May 2003 to the two-star rank of
major general; Marion (Spike) Bowman, who blocked FBI investigations into
the alleged hijackers before 9/11, was given an award for “exceptional
performance” after a 9/11 Congressional Inquiry report claimed that his unit
gave Minneapolis FBI agents “inexcusably confused and inaccurate
information” that was “patently false.”

Conclusion

The above facts are sufficient to reject the official account of 9/11 and
consider the administration of President George W. Bush as the main suspect
for this crime against humanity. While the facts are not sufficient for
leveling criminal charges against specific individuals, they permit general
conclusions to be drawn regarding the dangerous nature of the U.S. regime
and the complicity of the political class, mainstream media, academia, and
the justice system of NATO member states in covering-up the crime of 9/11
and shielding those responsible for that crime.

*

This article was originally published on
<https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2018/04/20/10-irrefutable-devastating
-9-11-facts/> Truth and Shadows.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20190107/5adb2d66/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD000.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20190107/5adb2d66/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 737 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20190107/5adb2d66/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1457 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20190107/5adb2d66/attachment-0005.jpg>

More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list