[Peace-discuss] If America Stopped Destroying The World, The Bad Guys Might Win

[David Johnson]

If America Stopped Destroying The World, The Bad Guys Might Win

*	 
*	 
*	 
*	 
*	 
*	 

https://i1.wp.com/caitlinjohnstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Screen-Sho
t-2019-01-13-at-10.21.40-AM.jpg?fit=747%2C473&ssl=1

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-politics-pompeo/pompeo-says-ve
nezuelas-maduro-government-is-illegitimate-idUSKCN1P60FL?utm_campaign=trueAn
them:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5c3a093404d301513ed8a872&utm_medium=trueA
nthem&utm_source=twitter> told reporters on Saturday that the government
under Venezuela's recently re-inaugurated president Nicolas Maduro is
"illegitimate", and that "the United States will work diligently to restore
a real democracy to that country."

Pompeo's remarks, which
<https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/11/bolton-claims-manduro-illegitimat
e-claim-1098634> were echoed by Trump's National Security Advisor John
Bolton, are interesting for a couple of reasons. The first is because
Venezuela's presidential election in May of last year (which incidentally
was
<https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/The-Case-for-Legitimacy-of-Maduros-Seco
nd-Presidential-Term-20190108-0026.html> found to have been perfectly
legitimate by the international Council of Electoral Experts of Latin
America) was  <https://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/13841> actively and
aggressively meddled in by the US and its allies. The second is that while
the US government is openly broadcasting its intention to keep interfering
in Venezuela's political system, it continues to scream bloody murder about
alleged Russian interference in its own democratic process two years ago.

What is the difference between the behavior of the United States, which
remains far and away
<https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/americas-long-history-of-meddling-i
n-other-countries-elections> the single worst offender in foreign election
meddling on the planet, and what Russia is accused of having done in 2016?
According to
<https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/ex-cia-director-thinks-us-hypocrisy-abou
t-election-meddling-is-hilarious-3262692029fe> a comment made by former CIA
Director James Woolsey last year, it's that the US interferes in foreign
democracies "for a very good cause."

And that's really the only argument that empire loyalists have going for
them on this subject. The US is different because the US has moral
authority. It's okay for the US to continue to interfere in the political
affairs of foreign nations while it would be an unforgivable and outrageous
"
<https://theintercept.com/2018/02/19/a-consensus-emerges-russia-committed-an
-act-of-war-on-par-with-pearl-harbor-and-911-should-the-u-s-response-be-simi
lar/> act of war" for a nation like Russia to do the exact same thing,
because the US is countering the interests of the Bad Guys while Russia is
countering the interests of the Good Guys. Who decided who the Good Guys and
Bad Guys are in this argument? The US.

This "What we do is good because we're the Good Guys" faith-based doctrine
was regurgitated with full-throated zealotry in
<https://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2019/01/288410.htm> a recent speech
given by Pompeo in Cairo, in which he cited "America's innate goodness" in
making the  <https://theintercept.com/2019/01/11/mike-pompeo-speech-cairo/>
absolutely ridiculous claim that "America is a force for good in the Middle
East" which has been "absent too much" from the region previously. America's
nonstop deadly interventionism in the Middle East is "good", because America
is "innately good".

America's constant military interventionism, election interference and other
nastiness are painted as Good Things done by Good Guys to fight the Bad
Guys. The argument, when you boil it right down, is that if America wasn't
constantly starting wars, invading sovereign nations, staging coups,
sponsoring proxy conflicts, arming terrorists, bombing civilians, torturing
people, implementing starvation sanctions on impoverished populations,
pointing nuclear weapons everywhere, spying on us all with a globe-spanning
Orwellian surveillance network, interfering in foreign elections, and
patrolling the skies with flying death robots, the Bad Guys might win.

Sort of makes you wonder who the Bad Guys really are, huh?

The theme of Good Guys fighting Bad Guys resonates with a population that
has been raised for generations on Hollywood films featuring a handsome
action hero emerging victorious after a ninety-minute struggle and karate
kicking an ugly villain off a cliff before kissing the pretty girl, but it
doesn't accurately reflect the reality we actually live in. Our world is
dominated by extremely powerful people who are motivated not out of interest
in good or evil but a drive toward power and profit which is completely
disinterested in morality of any kind, and the empires they build for
themselves have their foundations on the backs of ordinary people who are
just trying to get by. The majority of those extremely powerful people
either live in the United States or have formed alliances with US power
structures, and all their agendas in Asia, South America, the Middle East
and elsewhere have nothing to do with "protecting democracy" or being a
"force of good", and everything to do with amassing more power.

Even among those who recognize that the US-centralized empire isn't a
shining beacon of virtue in our world, the notion remains prevalent that if
American power ceases to be a unipolar dominator then someone worse will
take over the world. This fear-based mindset ultimately underlies all
establishment manipulation and all educated support for it: the idea that
someone needs to rule and dominate the world to prevent someone else from
doing the same. But what are the fruits of this mindset? A corporatist
Orwellian dystopia hurtling toward climate collapse if nuclear war doesn't
kill us all first.

We can't keep doing this. We literally can't; we'll evolve beyond this
fear-based dominator paradigm or we'll all perish beneath its feet very
soon. We are now in a position where our irrational fear of being invaded by
China has pushed us to the brink of extinction, so it isn't even a gamble to
step off that train and try something else instead.

It is entirely possible that the US is capable of functioning like a normal
nation and simply defending its own shores and sustaining itself without
interfering in world affairs. It is entirely possible that the threat
everyone imagines of some foreign power stepping in as the unipolar
dominator should America vacate that role is the product of fearful
imaginings with no bearing on reality and a fundamental misunderstanding of
humanity. It is entirely possible that we are capable of creating a world
where nobody dominates anybody, and no iron-fisted world leader of any kind
is needed. Either way, the train we're on is headed for a brick wall, so
we've now got nothing to lose by stepping off.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20190114/2390440d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 60763 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20190114/2390440d/attachment-0001.jpg>