[Peace] [sf-core] Fwd: couple things

[C. G. ESTABROOK]

Is his EVIL of a different order - qualitatively different - from that of Obama 
or Rahm Emanuel?

Obama, certainly, has killed more people in the Mideast than Rove did.  Even if 
you credit Rove with all the deaths caused by Bush's invasion of Iraq, the 
administration that followed his is gaining on a prorated basis...

And the administration that preceded Bush's killed as many Iraqis as Bush/Rove 
did (and more of them were children).

I agree about the evil. It's the uniqueness I wonder about, especially when a 
suggestion of uniqueness is used covertly to defend the current administration.

--CGE

pnolan64 wrote:
> It has nothing to do with Republican or Democrat for me.  I'm going to demonstrate because this man was and is EVIL,  and evil should be countered whenever and wherever it is encountered.  Period.  (Especially when evil comes to my adopted hometown...I'm supposed to sit back and do nothing in response?  BULLPUCKY)
> 
> I will not allow people to forget what this man did.
> 
> "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."-George Santayana
> Paul Nolan
> 
>  
> "To thine own self be true."
> William Shakespeare
> <style type="text/css"></style>
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: C. G. ESTABROOK <cge at shout.net>
> To: james barrett <jrbarret at uiuc.edu>
> Cc: awaRE peace <>; Belden Fields <a-fields at uiuc.edu>; SFcore <sf-core at yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wed, March 10, 2010 7:01:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Peace] [sf-core] Fwd: couple things
> 
> But a demonstration against the last administration while the Democrats are in
> power will be seen as a defense of the latter - as Move On e.g. clearly means it
> to be.
> 
> What would we have said of a demonstration against the Clinton administration in
> 2002? --CGE
> 
> 
> james barrett wrote:
>>
>> I take the criticism of the current administration and I have all of my own,
>> but if the equation is between Obama (or better Democrats than him) and Karl
>> Rove, then I guess I find that a bit perverse.
>>
>> Jim Barrett
>>
>> At 04:54 PM 3/10/2010, C. G. ESTABROOK wrote:
>>> What's the point of demonstrating against Republicans at this point?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Belden Fields wrote:
>>>> [Attachment(s) <#TopText> from Belden Fields included below]
> 
> 
> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peace mailing list
> Peace at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace
> 
> 
> 
>       

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.