[Peace] "Reform SS" means cuts: don't let Congress & Obama do it

[C. G. Estabrook]

The meaning of the following is that our local congressman supports  
cutting Social Security for those under 55. Congress must not be  
allowed to do that.

This is not a 'partisan' issue (= involving difference between the two  
business parties): the Obama administration supports "reform" (= cuts)  
in
Social Security as well. Whatever Democrat emerges to run against Rep.  
Johnson would eventually vote for cuts, too, in imitation of the  
president.

Tell Mr. Johnson, "No cuts at all to Social Security!"

Rep. Timothy V. Johnson
[Washington, D.C. Office]
1207 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: 202-225-2371

[Champaign Office]
2004 Fox Drive
Champaign, IL 61820
Phone: 217-403-4690

http://timjohnson.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=56&sectiontree=3,56


On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Congressman Timothy V. Johnson wrote:

"...the Social Security Board of Trustees issued a report explaining  
the Social Security Trust Fund will be exhausted by 2036. For this  
reason, I believe this program must be reformed to preserve it for  
future generations. I do not support eliminating the program and I do  
not support making any changes that would affect anyone currently  
fifty-five or older. However, I do want to make these programs better  
so they are sustainable for the long term."