[Peace] Press release

[Karen Aram]

At one time they followed the below, today they simply criticize, agitate, disrupt, and/or slander in an effort to discredit those who are involved in attempting to change the system.  Somehow insisting they can do or think better. When given the opportunity to do, they don't. It then becomes obvious who and what they are, time and time again they will go after individuals and groups and its always the same, instead of working to change whats wrong they go after those that are, by wearing them down or just boring them to death. It's one of those things you can't really discribe, but you know it when you see or hear it.
 
The technical term: 
 
An agent provocateur (French for "inciting agent") is an undercover agent who acts to entice another person to commit an illegal or rash act or falsely implicate them in partaking in an illegal act. An agent provocateur may be employed by the police or other entity to discredit or harm another group (e.g., peaceful protest or demonstration) by provoking them to commit an act - thus, undermining the protest or demonstration as whole.
To prevent infiltration by agents provocateurs,[1] the organizers of large or controversial assemblies may deploy and coordinate demonstration marshals, also called stewards.[2][3]
 
 

 
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:31:38 -0600
From: yaaqovz at gmail.com
To: davegreen84 at yahoo.com
CC: peace-discuss at anti-war.net; discuss-communitycourtwatch at lists.chambana.net; peace at lists.chambana.net
Subject: Re: [Peace] Press release


David Green, 

Indeed, the meeting I referred to was at CPL a panel you were on.  My specific question to Dr Abu Al-Aish at UFL, was about Vittorio Arrigoni and his assassination by Hamas.  The level of your purposeful misquoting my statements at that and other meetings critically disappoints me.  If this is what an academic does when getting into politics, don't we have such politicians already


Your ethnic profiling of me is indicative of the depth you would apply to someone challenging your standpoint. You would think, it's your campaign related need to tarnish one's image and trivialize her/his comments.  After all, you are trying so hard to show you are concerned and involved with your potential voters (yet in the face of disagreements, you do whatever it takes to defend your ticket, it's a mere technicality to pass over a hurdle).   Did you really need to embed your reply with offensive remarks, character assassination attempts?  isn’t Rush Limbaugh an excellent spokesperson for doing that already?  
 
And you haven’t answered yet my question: what you considered Palestinians (?) other than by implying they are those people that Israelis have been been horrible with.  Mind you, you propose no change about that,


Ya'aqov
































































_______________________________________________
Peace mailing list
Peace at lists.chambana.net
https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace/attachments/20131227/d4651dde/attachment.html>