[IMC-US] u.s. indymedia caucus, AMC:

[faith swords]

hey dan,

i took the notes and what i meant by that (it was an awkward conversation
to transcribe since i asked the question ;) was, "what about the indymedia
people who don't have a local IMC near them but still wish to be
involved?" sascha said that we want to encourage people to work on the
local level, but if that's not possible, we're not exactly going to be
like, "hey, sorry, you can't help out because you live in the wrong
place."

does that help?

--faith

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, dan scott wrote:

> Nice, thanks for the excellent notes.
>
> I'm wondering how much conversation has gone into editorial policy
> discussion. The paragraph below concerns me.
>
> " Editorial collective is open to all local IMCs. What about people not in
> local IMCs? They.re ok too, but we promote local involvement. No one.s going
> to get turned away."
>
> The noone gets turned away comment. what does this mean? It seems to me that
> participants in an IMC project must come from a local, or at least be
> vouched / invited by a local unless theirs some technological solution
> (rating/ privileges like slashdot) being worked on.
>
> Danscott
> NycIMC
>