[IMC-US] feature question

[max]

that sounds good to me.  it seems silly to have a totally new feature just
for a small update.  there is a precedent for doing on this on www.indy as
well (I'm pretty sure).

max


Quoting bradley at riseup.net:

> Deva wrote and Bradley responds....
> 
> > It was decided to leave center column features alone that have been
> > promoted. So now the top feature is about Nader asking for a recount
> in
> > NH and the latest news is that the request was denied. How should such
> > a situation be dealt with?
> 
> Tough question. Here's one suggestion....
> 
> This suggestion would work ok with this particular story, and should
> work
> with others, but it may not work well with a feature with a really long
> summary, cuz then you may miss the update for one reason or another....
> 
> 
> clearly write "update" after the summary and give a link. This could be
> done in a different color.
> 
> 
> "Washington, DC: The Nader/Camejo campaign has filed a challenge to the
> voting results in New Hampshire after receiving numerous complaints from
> voting rights activits. Below is Nader's letter to New Hampshire
> requesting a recount. Also, below is Nader's view on electronic voting
> without a paper trial. In addition, the Nader/Camejo campaign offered
> our
> campaign to poll watchers who wanted to be credentialed to be inside to
> monitor electronic voting. Hundreds of democracy activists in Maryland
> working with TrueVoteMD.org were credentialed to monitor polling through
> the Populist Party which was created by Nader-Camejo supporters in
> Maryland. read more >>
> 
> [ The Election was Stolen; How we know & Why it matters ]"
> 
> <b>Update posted 11/6/04</b>: <a href="LINK">The Request Was Denied</a>
> 
> ----------------------
> 
> This is a mild form of modification to the article though, perhaps
> updates
> made by the Indymedia.us Editorial folks could be done in a different
> color (nothing too dramatic, just enough make a small distinction
> between
> the feature from the local IMC and the editorial update)
> 
> 
> >
> > Also, which list should this go to?
> 
> I think it should go to the editorial list.
> 
> If you are not currently on the editorial list, you may want to be ( ;
> 
> http://lists.ucimc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us-editorial
> 
> sincerely,
> Bradley
> santa cruz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IMC-US mailing list
> IMC-US at lists.cu.groogroo.com
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us
>