[IMC-US] fixing banners

[bht]

i think the stretch banner looks fine, but then again i wear all black.

i think the site will look great stretched out, as I have noted before, 
and if we give more room to syndicated local features, so they can more 
readily have images and look great.  I would even go so far as having 
equal widths for the center column and the right column, making ther 
only difference the length of time a promoted feature stays up.

those're my thoughts!
bht

john duda wrote:

>i think the current site looks somewhat amateurish when viewed on a
>large screen, when only maybe half the browser window is used. i also
>not sure if the current design would look good centered.
>
>Personally, I really want to see more info visible at a glance, and I
>don't think the stretched banners look that bad....
>
>Any one else want to weigh in here?
>
>john
> 
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:34:06PM -0400, daniel scott wrote:
>  
>
>>i still think its a bad idea to move away from the fixed width site. 
>>The design elements in the banner get thrown off when you stretch it, 
>>and i think the increased info you get without scrolling when you move 
>>to a stretchable site is not worth messing up the banner for.
>>
>>best
>>dan
>>nyc imc
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>IMC-US mailing list
>>IMC-US at lists.ucimc.org
>>http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us
>>    
>>
>
>  
>