[IMC-US] new admin, big muddy

[muna rva imc]

I just set up Running Dog from Big Muddy IMC with an admin account over the
phone. He's still got to log in and give it a whirl, but he knows where to find
folks online now, too.

Big Muddy doesn't currently into the US wire. Can someone look into this? If
there's anything they need to do, just send Running Dog an email -- BM's got a
couple of techs who could possible fix problems on their end.

X,
M.


Quoting Running Dog <bethemedia at alliedaccess.net>:

> hey all,
>    I'm pleading ignorance, but that hasn't stopped me before . . . . but
> maybe some of the load is heavy on others because folks like me don't know
> what to be doing or how to be doing it. I help with imc-us list admin stuff
> which takes maybe five minutes a day tops. But if someone could give me
> specific instructions on "the simple daily tasks" mentioned by muna, I'd be
> more than glad to pick up some slack.
> 
> jerry
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "baku lost" <baku at riseup.net>
> To: "muna rva imc" <muna at richmondindymedia.org>
> Cc: "Working Group for IMC-US." <imc-us at lists.ucimc.org>;
> <imc-us-editorial at lists.ucimc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 1:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [Imc-us-editorial] Feature Process - propose, 6 hour wait,
> promote
> 
> 
> > this sounds reasonable to me.
> >
> > baku
> > atx imc
> >
> > muna rva imc wrote:
> >
> > >In this meeting, those present agreed to return to a feature process that
> > >involves:
> > >
> > >1. PROPOSE the feature to the editorial list
> > >2. WAIT 6 hours to hear agreement/disagreement
> > >3. PROMOTE if there are no blocks within that time
> > >
> > >This process importantly relies upon waiting to hear blocks, rather than
> > >seconds. As in practice it seems people who have no problem with a piece
> going
> > >up often don't take time to email an agreeing, while blocks tend come
> pretty
> > >quickly.
> > >
> > >Also of note: Last time I counted, there are 29 folks with active admin
> accounts
> > >for the site. There has got to be a way to divy out responsibility for
> the page
> > >so that the simple daily tasks are lightened out across the load of more
> than
> > >two dozen people.
> > >
> > >X,
> > >M.
> > >
> > >Quoting bht <bht at indymedia.org>:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>apparently the notes are here:
> > >>http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Local/ImcUsMeeting2005August2Log
> > >>
> > >>bht
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>IMC-US mailing list
> > >>IMC-US at lists.ucimc.org
> > >>http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >IMC-US-Editorial mailing list
> > >IMC-US-Editorial at lists.ucimc.org
> > >http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us-editorial
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IMC-US-Editorial mailing list
> > IMC-US-Editorial at lists.ucimc.org
> > http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us-editorial
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IMC-US-Editorial mailing list
> IMC-US-Editorial at lists.ucimc.org
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us-editorial
>