[rfu-membership] Re: [RFU] unscheduled shows

Mike Lehman rebelmike at earthlink.net
Tue Apr 24 14:19:12 CDT 2007


This adds up to five hours though. I'm hesitant about approving this 
without input from others, due to the 4 hour rule.
Mike Lehman

dan blah wrote:
> 7-10pm sundays, sunday night sound system - joe c. and myself
> 10am-12pm tuesdays, sexy geek speak - beeda and myself
>
> On 4/24/07, Ken Urban <kurban at parkland.edu> wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> Can be more explicit about what shows you have and who's the second 
>> member on what show so I can update the schedule.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> Ken Urban
>> Assoc. Prof., Computer Science
>> Parkland College
>>
>> Office: B129A
>>            (217)-353-2246
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>
>> >>> "dan blah" <dan.blah at gmail.com> 04/24/07 10:54 AM >>>
>> yeah this all sounds good to me.  i would like to make a proposal that
>> the new show that goes from 6 to 7 on sunday's (if they are willing as
>> this i think was their idea) move to 5 to 6 and then sexy geek speak
>> goes from 6 to 7.  this gets them out of the craziness that is setting
>> up for sunday night sound system and cuts me back to 4 hours.
>>
>> On 4/24/07, Mike Lehman <rebelmike at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> > It's in the notes somewhere, but a decision was made at some point to
>> > limit show slots to two hours. No one can be a qualifying member of 
>> more
>> > than two shows. This is so that no one has more than 4 hours of 
>> airtime
>> > during a week, ensuring that air time is distributed among a 
>> variety of
>> > programming groups.
>> >
>> > So a three hour show would mean that those listed as qualifying 
>> members
>> > would only be eligible to qualify one more hour of programming in a 
>> slot
>> > during any week's schedule.
>> >
>> > I don't necessarily have a problem with a three hour show, per se, as
>> > long as those involved  follow these other restrictions.
>> >
>> > As far as the current schedule goes, no show should be considered
>> > scheduled in a slot until the website is updated. This eliminates any
>> > question about who is scheduled during a slot. In the future, I would
>> > greatly prefer that new slots should not be considered as formally
>> > scheduled until they actually appear on the updated webpage.
>> >
>> > Ideally, the current schedule should be posted in the studio for quick
>> > reference, so that we don't run into any unanticipated conflicts 
>> and so
>> > that everyone who wants to utilize an open slot for practice, etc 
>> has an
>> > equal chance at using it. Otherwise, one of us could get sucked into
>> > trying to sort out a situation where we don't have any quick reference
>> > to confirm whether or not a slot is open and who is scheduled to be 
>> in a
>> > slot. Everyone acted reasonably in this case, but we know from 
>> previous
>> > experience that this may not always be the case.
>> >
>> > Relying on the posted schedule as the final word helps avoid such
>> > conflicts since everyone will be able to consult it as the final word.
>> > If something is not on the schedule, but should be, then it's best 
>> that
>> > the schedule be updated before it is used to make any claims for a 
>> slot.
>> > Mike Lehman
>> >
>> > Ken Urban wrote:
>> > > I was under the impression that shows were two hours in length, 
>> but I now notice we have (at least) two three hour shows.  My 
>> scheduling was based on the assuption (false?) that programming 
>> groups were limited to two hours per week, but I can't find any 
>> reference of this in the bylaws.
>> > >
>> > > Can anyone shed more light on this? (Mike?)
>> > >
>> > > Ken
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> > > Ken Urban
>> > > Assoc. Prof., Computer Science
>> > > Parkland College
>> > >
>> > > Office: B129A
>> > >            (217)-353-2246
>> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>>> "dan blah" <dan.blah at gmail.com> 04/23/07 9:27 PM >>>
>> > >>>>
>> > > no problem, thanks for being a concerned rfu'er.  we can never 
>> have enough
>> > > of this with an all volunteer run organization where we all can't 
>> be around.
>> > >
>> > > On 4/23/07, Fred Wilkinson <FWilkinson at co.champaign.il.us> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>  Thanks for letting me know.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> *Fred Wilkinson*
>> > >>
>> > >> Chief Deputy Circuit Clerk
>> > >>
>> > >> Champaign County Circuit Clerk's Office
>> > >>
>> > >> 101 E. Main Street
>> > >>
>> > >> Urbana, Illinois 61801
>> > >>
>> > >> (217) 384-3767
>> > >>
>> > >> e-mail - fwilkinson at co.champaign.il.us
>> > >>   ------------------------------
>> > >>
>> > >> *From:* dan blah [mailto:dan.blah at gmail.com]
>> > >> *Sent:* Monday, April 23, 2007 1:40 PM
>> > >> *To:* Fred Wilkinson
>> > >> *Cc:* rfu at lists.chambana.net
>> > >> *Subject:* Re: [RFU] unscheduled shows
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> sunday night sound system was approved to expand from 8 to 10 a 
>> couple
>> > >> months ago to go from 7 to 10 and was apparently not updated on the
>> > >> calendar.  4 of those guys (rory, mertz, joe, and myself) 
>> consume the slot
>> > >> from 7 to 10 and 10 to midnight and all paying trained members.  
>> everyone
>> > >> else are our guest djs and of course do not pay or are members 
>> as they
>> > >> rotate.
>> > >>
>> > >> On 4/23/07, *Fred Wilkinson* <FWilkinson at co.champaign.il.us> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Yesterday (Sunday, 4/22) my nephew had his first show.  It was 
>> scheduled
>> > >> by Ken to run from 6pm to 8pm as that time appeared open on the 
>> schedule.
>> > >> At 7pm four gentlemen appeared and indicated that they had a 
>> slot from 7 to
>> > >> 8.  Dan appeared and confirmed.  My question is: who are these 
>> guys?  Have
>> > >> they paid dues?  Do we have other regular shows that are off the 
>> schedule?
>> > >> My nephew doesn't care as he can just as easily go from 5 to 7 
>> and he will
>> > >> be gone for the summer in a month anyway.  But given the 
>> security breaches
>> > >> we have had in recent times, I do not think it is good practice 
>> to have a
>> > >> regular show that is not on the schedule.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > RFU mailing list
>> > RFU at lists.chambana.net
>> > http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/rfu
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFU mailing list
>> RFU at lists.chambana.net
>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/rfu
>>
>
>



More information about the rfu-membership mailing list