[Trees-executive] Needed input

[Pauline Bartolone]

I agree as well. -Pauline


>From: "Mary C. Schlembach" <schlemba at uiuc.edu>
>Reply-To: <schlemba at uiuc.edu>
>To: "Carl H. Malmgren, II" <malmgren at life.uiuc.edu>, 
><trees-executive at lists.groogroo.com>
>CC: <JMcma83890 at aol.com>
>Subject: RE: [Trees-executive] Needed input
>Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:52:47 -0600
>
>I, too, agree with John and Carl.
>
>-m
>
>Mary C. Schlembach
>Asst. Engineering Librarian for Digital Services
>154 Grainger Engineering Library
>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>1301 W. Springfield Ave.
>Urbana, IL 61801
>217.333.3158
>FAX 217.244.7764
>schlemba at uiuc.edu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: trees-executive-admin at lists.groogroo.com
> > [mailto:trees-executive-admin at lists.groogroo.com]On Behalf Of Carl H.
> > Malmgren, II
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:07 AM
> > To: trees-executive at lists.groogroo.com
> > Cc: JMcma83890 at aol.com
> > Subject: [Trees-executive] Needed input
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I looked over this and agree with John.  Please e-mail John your
> > position and then we can get this taken care of.
> >
> > BTW I am gone starting tomorrow.
> >
> > Carl
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 11:04:42 -0500
> > >To: JMcma83890 at aol.com
> > >From: "Carl H. Malmgren, II" <malmgren at life.uiuc.edu>
> > >Subject: Re: ICC Notice
> > >Cc:
> > >Bcc:
> > >X-Attachments:
> > >
> > >>Carl,
> > >>
> > >>If you check the e-docket you should see that the attorney for the
> > >>intervening cities in the IP area has objected to the petition
> > to intervene
> > >>by AmerenCIPS and Ameren UE and that the hearing officer has given all
> > >>parties until 3/19 to file replies. My view is that it best serves our
> > >>purposes to remain noncommittal on this matter, i.e., file no
> > reply. I do not
> > >>want to oppose Mr. Ader because, at least so far, he remains a
> > useful ally
> > >>and I'd like to keep it that way. On the other hand, he wants
> > to keep this
> > >>proceeding as neat and tidy as possible, which is why he
> > doesn't want parties
> > >>outside the IP area intervening. For our purposes, I want to
> > remain free to
> > >>support other activist groups outside the IP area, like the
> > Peoria group. We
> > >>can more credibly support such groups if we do not oppose
> > intervention by
> > >>utility companies outside the IP area. Further, the more out of
> > control this
> > >>proceeding gets, the clearer it should be to the ICC that IP
> > has stirred up a
> > >>hornet's nest and that the public is paying very close
> > attention to what the
> > >>ICC does.
> > >>
> > >>Anyway, there's my view. If the executive committee sees it 
>differently,
> > >>please let me know ASAP so that I can prepare a reply.
> > >>
> > >>John McMahon
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Trees-executive mailing list
> > Trees-executive at lists.groogroo.com
> > http://lists.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/trees-executive
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Trees-executive mailing list
>Trees-executive at lists.groogroo.com
>http://lists.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/trees-executive

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com