[Commotion-dev] Commotion Client Development
Joshua Besneatte
besneatte at gmail.com
Sat Jun 7 14:25:35 EDT 2014
Hi Paul,
Thanks. This is exactly the project I was planning on starting myself,
luckily I found you guys and it's already going. The enthusiasm is easy
on my end, glad to see there are many others with my vision.
I got a decent deb build working for Serval Project's serval-dna
incorporating a bunch of the scripts from OTI's serval-dna debian
folder. I can install/uninstall the serval-dna development fork,
including libs/includes/etc, however, commotiond doesn't want to
compile against this version of serval-dna. Compilation of commotiond
errors out stating that the llseek64 system call is not available. So
far my only guesses are:
1. I am missing a dependency. (manpages-dev is supposed to provide
llseek64 but installing said package did not help)
2. commotiond needs to use OTI's version of serval-dna
3. I need to rebuild SP's serval-dna as package class "single" vs "indep"
If anyone could shed some light on this, that would be great.
If I build and install OTI's serval-dna I am able to compile commotiond
without problem.
As for the commotion-service-manager, does this still require
luci-commotion? Luci-commotion fails to install on requirement for the
deprecated serval-crypto.
I have read most of the development docs and road-maps, but of course I
may have missed something. It seems the goal is to move to using SP's
serval-dna (for full serval compatibility) vs the OTI fork, is this
correct? Is OTI's serval-crypto deprecated because crypto is now handled
by SP's serval-dna?
My nick is shamanon on IRC and I am in the #commotion channel if anyone
wants to strike up a conversation there.
Thanks!
On 06/07/2014 02:05 AM, Paul Gardner-Stephen wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> Great work. I recall that there may already be a debian package for
> serval-dna. Andrew can probably comment on this.
>
> Paul.
>
>
More information about the Commotion-dev
mailing list