[Cu-wireless] antenna news

[David Young]

Maybe all our tests are whacked, but I think that we routinely get a
higher signal/noise ratio. I will review our numbers just as soon as I
have my notebook in front of me.

Possibly the Pringles can's insides are not "metallic," but they are
certainly conductive, as I have proven again and again to myself by
poking the electrodes of an ohm-meter through the plastic film. Maybe
the experimenter at turnpoint.net didn't realize that the aluminized
layer was not exposed.

Dave

On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:58:38AM -0600, Zachary C. Miller wrote:
> Looks like waveguides in fact are far superior to pringles cans. Time
> for us to give up our chip habit and take on a beef stew craving.
> 
> http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/has.html
> 
> -- 
> Zachary C. Miller - @= - http://wolfgang.groogroo.com/
> IMSA 1995 - UIUC 2000 - Just Another Leftist Muppet - Ya Basta!
>  Social Justice, Community, Nonviolence, Decentralization, Feminism,
>  Sustainability, Responsibility, Diversity, Democracy, Ecology
> _______________________________________________
> Cu-wireless mailing list
> Cu-wireless at lists.groogroo.com
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless

-- 
David Young                   On the Job Consulting
dyoung at onthejob.net     Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933