[CUWiN] accept FreeNetworks peering agreement?

Sascha Meinrath sascha at ucimc.org
Mon Aug 23 10:58:01 CDT 2004


On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, David Young wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 07:03:46PM -0500, Bryan Cribbs wrote:
> > I have no objections.  Do you know what is needed to
> > satisfy section II.1 ?  (At a brief glance, I could not
> > find examples of what other freenetworks have published
> > on their sites).
>
> Our "network design" document should suffice.  I will ask.
>
> In light of the fact that freenetworks.org members are tunneling to
> each other, we should re-work our IPv4 numbering scheme to use our 10/8
> address reservation at freenetworks.org, 10.24/16.  While we are at it,
> we should make the routes aggregable.  This is really going to pinch
> the hack we use to make IPs out of MACs. :-) Just to stay focused on
> our current development, we should postpone this change until next year.

also, depending on what happens with Harold Feld and IPv6, we may have
"real" IPs available by next year.

--sascha

-- 
Sascha Meinrath
Project Manager & Pres.  *  Project Coordinator  *  Project Manager
Acorn Worker Collective *** CU Wireless Network *** Eggplant Active Media
www.acorncollective.com  *  www.cuwireless.net   *  www.eggplantmedia.com


More information about the CU-Wireless mailing list