[CUWiN] Antenna
Frank Keeney
la at pasadena.net
Tue Mar 8 12:34:50 CST 2005
I tested one of those against similar gain antennas in an open environment
with a few obstructions. I found no advantage to them and they cost more
than the others that were compared. YMMV
Frank Keeney
http://www.wlanparts.com
> -----Original Message-----
> On Behalf Of Quantum Scientific
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 9:23 AM
> To: cu-wireless at cuwireless.net
> Subject: Re: [CUWiN] Antenna
>
>
> BTW, has anyone actually tried these:
> http://www.wifi-plus.com/pages/8/index.htm
>
> Supposed to go around obstructions. I've done quite a bit of
> research, and
> all I find is press releasen. Anything close to an objective
> review gives
> 404. It does not seem to be circularly-polarized, like I'd
> expected. It's
> hard to believe that it's anything other than a helical cone
> antenna.
> Overall, it looks like 'snake-oil', but actual experience is valuable.
>
> Carl Cook
>
More information about the CU-Wireless
mailing list