[Imc-newsroom] AT&T charges:

[Brian Hagy]

yeppers, it does clarify.  thanks.  ;)

brian



On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Sascha Meinrath wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Brian Hagy wrote:
>
> > um, didn't know any one person had the authority to disrupt the system
> > like that.  there's gotta be other ways, rather than you makin these kinds
> > of decisions.  maybe have the news group tackle the bill?  it was their
> > charge, seems like they should be involved with solving the concern.
>
> actually, i had previously asked the newsgroup to help with the charges.
> and have also asked that someone from that group take responsibility for
> contacting AT&T.  given that a) no one stepped forward to contact AT&T --
> so i've been taking on this added responsibility; b) only one person
> has offered to help defray these costs; and, c) i'm responsible for both
> our phone service and keeping the UCIMC from bankrupting itself.  after
> giving notice to the news group that this was a problem and after
> receiving no constructive solutions that address this problem, only then
> am i taking this step.
>
> i hope this helps clarify the process i've followed,
>
> --sascha
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Sascha Meinrath wrote:
> >
> > > I am forced to pay the $140 phone bill or be charged additional fees from
> > > AT&T.  Given that the UCIMC simply cannot afford charges like this, I will
> > > probably have to put a permanent block on long-distance calls to prevent
> > > this from happening in the future.  I may also cancel our second phone
> > > line to help recoup the loss.
> > >
> > > --Sascha
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Imc-newsroom mailing list
> > > Imc-newsroom at urbana.indymedia.org
> > > http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-newsroom
> > >
> >
>