[Imc-tech] no more tech?

[Brian Hagy]

well, i've kinda been hibernating cuz of the prompting theater's next show
in may (well, next new show).  i'm writing about an hour's worth of music
for it, and putting the actor's recorded voices into the soundtrack.  so,
in other words, i've been focused solely on that.  the end of that is
nearing, and i'll be back hard core to meetings.

with that said, maybe tech should meet maybe once a month, just to do
stuff like check the equipment, address any pressing needs, and so forth.
i does seem like things are fairly smooth right now, but i'm not sure it's
wise to disban the group.  if for anything else, we're the ones overseeing
the equipment and theoretically making sure it's useable.  so, maybe we
move to the librarians structure and have our meetings become working
meetings (cleaning minidiscs, hard drives, etc.)?

thoughts?

brian (who will return soon!)




On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Paul Riismandel wrote:

> So it's been several weeks, at least, since Tech has had a real meeting.
> Mostly it's due to inattendance, or other meetings taking priority.
>
> So, does this mean that right now there's little need for an IMC Tech
> group?
>
> Right now Clint is radio news coordinator and has been focusing on the
> radio news tech. The Web group has been focusing on the website.  And
> otherwise we have no infrastructure problems.  So maybe we just don't
> need to have this group right now.
>
> The IMC is meant to have a dynamic structure, so if there's no need to
> have this group right now, we shouldn't.
>
> Ideas, opinions?
>
> Or, vote with your feet.  If nobody shows up to next week's meeting,
> I'll step down as spoke and effectively, tech will disappear anyway.'
>
> --Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-tech mailing list
> Imc-tech at urbana.indymedia.org
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-tech
>