[IMC-Tech] moving the busiest sites...

[David Young]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:15:53PM -0600, dan blah wrote:
> On 2/20/07, Mike Lehman <rebelmike at earthlink.net> wrote:
> >Dan,
> >Sounds pretty much OK with me.
> >
> >The only thing I would add is that it is nice when the website is down
> >that the email still works. But I'd gotten used to doing without when
> >they were together and dead -- it's just that this now seems like a luxury.
> >
> >Also, we always had some weird things with email in the past that drug
> >everything else down, tech stuff that is over my head, but assuming this
> >is under control, then maybe it's nothing to be concerned about now.
> >Mike Lehman
> >
> yeah most likely mail can stay where it is (on imsahp) for now.
> actually as it is now the server that i am proposing we move the
> busier sites too is already handling the email in that because
> insight's mail relay is to slow we are actually relaying all of our
> mail through it.  that server went offline for the first time in a
> couple years just a couple weeks ago.
> 
> most likely what i will do is keep mail where its at and set up mango
> as a backup so if imsahp/insight start acting up again we wont loose
> any mail.

Dan,

Help me understand the email setup.  Does IMC use E-P for outgoing mail,
or incoming mail, or both?

Why does Insight's relay enter the picture?

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung at ojctech.com      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933