[Imc-production] Re: [UCIMC-Tech] production room cleanup > Re:
RFU Public Files
Mike Lehman
rebelmike at earthlink.net
Mon Apr 21 09:57:01 CDT 2008
Chris,
They way the RFU access to the Production room has been dealt with so
far is by maintaining the lock with an alternative code that is the same
as the code to the RFU studio door.
An issue with locking the public file cabinet is that keys get lost or
misplaced. It would be better to have a combination lock. However, we've
not seen a need for locking when it was in the Production room. If it
gets moved out of there, it would definitely need to be locked.
As for training on security, it would be a big project to get everyone
at RFU through it. RFU has a goal of doing a mandatory mass retraining
for all DJs later on this year, so it could be incorporated into that as
the most viable option to provide that.
Mike Lehman
Chris Ritzo wrote:
> Great point Mike. Since access to the room requires being on the production list, perhaps as the room begins to see more use we should talk about an additional requirement so that everyone who has access goes through a basic training on the security requirements of the room itself and its contents. Is the file cabinet lockable? If this were the case, RFU could maintain additional security over the files so other groups who don't need access to them wouldn't have a key.
>
> Chris
>
> ---- Original message ----
>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:12:18 -0500
>> From: Mike Lehman <rebelmike at earthlink.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Imc-production] Re: [UCIMC-Tech] production room cleanup > Re: RFU Public Files
>> To: Josh King <josh at ucimc.org>
>> Cc: Chris Ritzo <critz1 at uiuc.edu>, Tommy Griscom <rgriscom at gmail.com>, imc-tech at lists.ucimc.org, Andrew Ó Baoill <andrew at funferal.org>, imc-production at lists.chambana.net
>>
>> On the subject of the RFU public files in the file cabinets in the
>> vault, it's more than just security that is needed. These files also
>> need to be readily accessible. In case of a FCC inspection, or even just
>> a request from a member of the public, the files need to be accessed so
>> that the DJ on air can present them for review.
>>
>> Since we also need to maintain a secure area for the files so they can't
>> be tampered with, keeping them in the production room is the best way to
>> make them securely accessible. Other suggestions on what to do with them
>> are welcome, but needs to have the same goal of making them securely
>> accessible.
>> Mike Lehman
>>
>> Josh King wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Ritzo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Andrew,
>>>> As a member of the tech group, I had initially volunteered to work on
>>>> the production workstation and the cleanup is kind of related to that.
>>>> Shows and WRFU along with other groups are all interested in using the
>>>> space too. We obviously want to involve these groups to make appropriate
>>>> decisions. The first thing on my mind is to see what's there, what
>>>> needs to be moved, etc, and then see what it will take to get the space
>>>> where we want it to be. It might be that we don't need to move the
>>>> filing cabinet, but I don't know.
>>>>
>>>> I also am not sure if any of this requires further approval from the
>>>> production group or steering for that matter. But there's a real
>>>> need/desire from several groups, so it seems we should start moving
>>>> forward. If anyone else has an idea about this, please chime in.
>>>>
>>>> We need to meet, as you said and talk about how to proceed. If you can
>>>> make it to the IMC-Tech meeting this Tuesday at 6pm in the main space, I
>>>> think this might be a good forum to start figuring it out.
>>>>
>>>> -Chris
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Ó Baoill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Tommy/Chris,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure how much time I can give to the issue, but I'm interested
>>>>> in some involvement with the production room work, in part because of
>>>>> the interactions with WRFU operations (and because improved audio
>>>>> editing facilities are in the interest of WRFU).
>>>>>
>>>>> At our meeting yesterday we discussed the proposal to move the WRFU
>>>>> printer, automation computer and filing cabinet. We think we may have
>>>>> some ideas/solutions for the first two - though subject to some
>>>>> constraints on placement. The filing cabinet may be an issue, because
>>>>> our studio has been built to be ADA compliant, and it may be difficult
>>>>> to find a space for the filing cabinet within the studio, but we may
>>>>> be able to come up with some solutions, given some time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Is this one of the filing cabinets in the vault now? I think the primary
>>> concern is security, as many groups would potentially use the production
>>> room space but should not be given access to WRFU resources,
>>> particularly the automation computer. I think that the tech meeting is
>>> definitely a good place to discuss this as Chris said, and I hope you
>>> can make it on Tuesday.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> It might be most helpful if I could meet you, and/or others involved
>>>>> with the production room project, at the IMC to discuss these (and
>>>>> other) aspects of the project. What sort of times might suit you for
>>>>> this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew Ó Baoill
>>>>> Station Manager
>>>>> WRFU-LP, Urbana 104.5FM
>>>>> http://www.wrfu.net andrew at funferal.org
>>>>> admin/voicemail: (217) 278 3933 x25
>>>>> (217) 344-2536 (studio)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> IMC-Tech mailing list
>>>> IMC-Tech at lists.ucimc.org
>>>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-tech
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Imc-production mailing list
>>> Imc-production at lists.chambana.net
>>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-production
>>>
>>>
More information about the IMC-Tech
mailing list