[UCIMC-Tech] IMC-bookkeeper list not working - getting 554 error "service not available" (gmail considered unsafe, but doesn't need to be -- +fix)

Danielle Chynoweth chyn at ojctech.com
Wed Jan 9 13:23:57 CST 2008


Yes, I use gmail, so maybe that is the prob.  Thanks for looking into this
Stuart and fixing it Josh!  Tech rocks!  - Danielle

On Jan 9, 2008 2:17 PM, Josh King <josh at ucimc.org> wrote:

> It seems like a bunch of dns blocklists have been added into the postfix
> config that we didn't have before, possibly in response to a recent spam
> problem. I agree that this is most likely the problem, so I've commented
> out the multihop line and reloaded postfix. Thanks for tracking that
> down, Stuart. We may have to further pare down the list of dnsbl's if we
> run into any more such problems.
>
> Stuart Levy wrote:
> > This is a mostly tech reply so not cc'ing finance...
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:19:34PM -0500, Danielle Chynoweth wrote:
> >> Is this a temporary or permanent problem?  I have had mail from IMC
> >> Bookkeeper bounce before, but not mail from other IMC lists. Have
> others
> >> experienced the same? - D
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon at googlemail.com>
> >> Date: Jan 9, 2008 1:14 PM
> >> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> >> To: arthousefarm at gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
> >>
> >> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
> >>
> >>     imc-bookkeeper at lists.chambana.net
> >>
> >> Technical details of permanent failure:
> >> PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 13): 554 Service unavailable; Client
> host [
> >> 64.233.166.181] blocked using multihop.dsbl.org;
> >> http://dsbl.org/listing?64.233.166.181
> >
> > This seems to mean that multihop.dsbl.org is listing 64.233.166.181,
> > one of google's mail servers, as a possible open mail relay.
> >
> > That affects any mail server (including the IMC's) that uses
> > multihop.dsbl.org to decide whether mail from a given source is
> > liable to be safe.
> >
> > Specifically it looks as though the IMC server will reject *some*
> > messages coming *from* gmail.com users.  If I'm guessing right, failures
> > may look random -- whether a message is accepted might depend on
> > just which gmail server happens to pass it to the IMC mail server.
> >
> > If that gmail server got listed as a multihop-possible-open-relay,
> > then it'll fail.  But maybe some got listed that way while others
> didn't.
> > E.g. 64.233.166.181 is listed that way, but ...182 and ...183 aren't.
> >
> > Digging through the past messages listed at the URL mentioned in the
> error,
> >    http://dsbl.org/listing?64.233.166.181
> >
> > one person points out that "http://dsbl.org/usage" says
> >
> >     Note that the multihop and unconfirmed lists are very aggressive and
> >     have the potential for a high level of false positives. The decision
> to
> >     block mail based on multihop, therefore, is philosophical as much as
> >     practical: doing so effectively punishes ISPs who do not proactively
> >     secure their networks by refusing significant legitimate mail from
> their
> >     customers. The unconfirmed list should only be used as part of a
> scoring
> >     system such as spamassassin, if at all.
> >
> > They seem to suggest that "list.dsbl.org" is a pretty
> > reliable guide to unsafe mail servers whose output shouldn't
> > be trusted, but that using "multihop.dsbl.org" is liable to
> > cause trouble just like this case.
> >
> > If other techies agree that this is the problem,
> > then a fix could be, on imsahp in /etc/postfix/main.cf
> > to comment out the line (line 415) which says
> >
> >         reject_rbl_client multihop.dsbl.org
> >
> > and then restart postfix (I don't know how to do that on Debian).
> > This would still leave the "reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org"
> > on the previous line.
> >
> >>   ----- Original message -----
> >>
> >> Received: by 10.140.147.18 with SMTP id
> u18mr583620rvd.267.1199902433821;
> >>        Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:13:53 -0800 (PST)
> >> Received: by 10.141.172.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:13:53 -0800
> (PST)
> >> Message-ID: <
> e20736840801091013x7dd581f8t1e37831a5a7d6290 at mail.gmail.com>
> >> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:13:53 -0500
> >> From: "Danielle Chynoweth" <chyn at ojctech.com>
> >> Sender: arthousefarm at gmail.com
> >> To: JOY <imcbooks at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [Imc-bookkeeper] Services Rendered
> >> Cc: imc-bookkeeper at lists.chambana.net
> >> In-Reply-To: <
> c6be167c0801090959p277a72a7r115647ea1ad1f761 at mail.gmail.com>
> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> >>        boundary="----=_Part_24946_3769132.1199902433817"
> >> References: <
> c6be167c0801090959p277a72a7r115647ea1ad1f761 at mail.gmail.com>
> >> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a897c8c2f8ef56d7
> >>
> >> ------=_Part_24946_3769132.1199902433817
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >> Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IMC-Tech mailing list
> >> IMC-Tech at lists.ucimc.org
> >> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-tech
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IMC-Tech mailing list
> > IMC-Tech at lists.ucimc.org
> > http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-tech
>
> --
> Josh King
> --
> josh at ucimc.org
> --
> System Administrator, Chambana.net (http://www.chambana.net)
> --
> "I am an Anarchist not because I believe Anarchism is the final goal,
> but because there is no such thing as a final goal." -Rudolf Rocker
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/imc-tech/attachments/20080109/e5e4c3c2/attachment.htm


More information about the IMC-Tech mailing list