[UCIMC-Tech] [IMC] coming tech changes to site calendar

Chris Ritzo chris.ritzo at gmail.com
Tue Mar 23 10:49:22 CDT 2010 

I agree that the approval process should be mindful of fiscal support.
Currently, Katy V is working with me to get the calendar functioning the way
it should. The actual new calendar is on the website, but not linked from
anywhere. Folks should continue using the existing calendar until
everything's ready. "Ready" should also include some sort of documentation
for those approving events. Ed's suggestion about distributing space
approvals is a good one, but as yet we don't have a technical implementation
for that. My goal is to replicate the functionality we have in the current
calendar (with some improvements) and then build upon that once it's done.

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Mike Lehman <rebelmike at earthlink.net>wrote:

> One thing we need to keep in mind is that income from the Family Room helps
> support the building. We're still struggling to come up with ways to do
> that. Meetings and events that use the Family Room should make some
> contribution to supporting the IMC, which is a very important reason why
> they should be accounted for on the calendar.
>
> I am not adverse to any particular group managing the Family Room, but they
> need to be conscious of the fact that the calendar is not just about
> coordination of use, but reminding those using the facility to contribute to
> its support. I am really appreciative of the efforts that Shows has made in
> making better utilization of first floor areas. That's brought us closer to
> breaking even, as have recent other efforts. Doing the same thing with
> utilization of the Family Room needs to be part of this, because we're still
> not yet out of the water financially.
> Mike Lehman
>
> Jacob Barton wrote:
>
>> ODDMUSIC has been using the family room in increasing amounts.  We're
>> still in proto-working-group status, but headed in that direction.  Anyway,
>> taking on the responsibility of scheduling that room would make our own
>> scheduling easier.
>>
>> (In fact, there's insufficient soundproofing between the oddmusic studio
>> and the family room to hold concurrent events in the two spaces, so when we
>> do anything public, we have to spill out.)
>>
>> Jacob
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Edwin Hawkes <oltime1 at att.net <mailto:
>> oltime1 at att.net>> wrote:
>>
>>    I wouldn't go so far as any spoke could approve events in the main
>>    space, or sum room, as there are times when we're in negotiations
>>    with an artist, or have pending events that may not be widely
>>    known. I think that the main space and sun room should be left to
>>    Shows. However Production should take care of the production area,
>>    maybe librarians should handle the library space, and the family
>>    room would be up for grabs. I think if too many people have
>>    access, it can get confusing, and cause problems. Right now I
>>    think there are meetings in the family room that aren't always on
>>    the calendar, and we have had some confusion in the past because
>>    of this. Is there anyway to separate the spaces so that a request
>>    for a specific location is directed to the working group
>>    responsible for that space? At this time any request to the
>>    calendar is emailed to the shows list, and Katy and I have the
>>    access to look at the request and follow up with it.
>>
>>    Ed
>>
>>
>>    Chris Ritzo wrote:
>>
>>>    I think that's a great discussion to have Ed. The permissions to
>>>    be able to approve events can be given to anyone with a specific
>>>    site role. Currently I'm using the "Editor" role, but this could
>>>    be a new role specifically for this. I'm all for widening the
>>>    pool of folks who can do stuff & it makes sense to me that any
>>>    working gruop spoke could approve an event. The only issue I see
>>>    us needing to figure out is with space rental. Folks approving
>>>    events would need to be up to speed on how that should be handled.
>>>
>>>    CR
>>>
>>>    On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Edwin Hawkes <oltime1 at att.net
>>>    <mailto:oltime1 at att.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>        We might want to talk about Shows role in approving events.
>>>        We are happy to continue approving events for all the spaces,
>>>        but if people think that someone else should do the library,
>>>        family room, production, or any space that doesn't include
>>>        the main space or sun room, we could probably see our way to
>>>        let someone else do that. Any thoughts?
>>>
>>>        Thanks,
>>>
>>>        Ed
>>>
>>>
>>>        Chris Ritzo wrote:
>>>
>>>>        Hey all,
>>>>
>>>>        Following on some of the tech announcements we had at last
>>>>        steering, the Tech group is moving forward with some changes
>>>>        to the event calendar on the main site.
>>>>
>>>>        These changes include:
>>>>        - moving from WebEasel to a true date-based calendar, built
>>>>        into the website.
>>>>        - abilitiy to propose an event in specific locations,
>>>>        specify an event type, associate an event with a particular
>>>>        working group, require event contact information, include a
>>>>        picture in an event, & more
>>>>        - site visitors viewing the calendar will be able to filter
>>>>        events by event type, location, working group, etc. as well.
>>>>        - provide ical feeds of the calendar to other calendars, and
>>>>        feasilbly be able to consume ical feeds from those calendars
>>>>        also
>>>>
>>>>        Currently the shows work group approves events, so a group
>>>>        role will be created on the main website which has admin
>>>>        access to approve events.
>>>>
>>>>        If spokes have comments or discussion on this change, or
>>>>        have suggestions for additional features please let the tech
>>>>        group know either in reply or at imc-tech at ucimc.org
>>>>        <mailto:imc-tech at ucimc.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        -CR
>>>>
>>>>        --         This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>        dangerous content by *MailScanner*
>>>>        <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>>>>
>>>>        believed to be clean.
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>>        IMC mailing list
>>>>        IMC at lists.chambana.net <mailto:IMC at lists.chambana.net>
>>>>
>>>>        http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/imc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>    --     This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>    dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
>>
>>    and is
>>    believed to be clean.
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    IMC mailing list
>>    IMC at lists.chambana.net <mailto:IMC at lists.chambana.net>
>>
>>    http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/imc
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>>
>> believed to be clean.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IMC mailing list
>> IMC at lists.chambana.net
>> http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/imc
>>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMC mailing list
> IMC at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/imc
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/imc-tech/attachments/20100323/3f6115e1/attachment.html>

More information about the IMC-Tech mailing list