[IMC-US-tech] where to host?

[Joshua Breitbart]

It would be great to have redundant servers, including one that was outside of 
the United States.

Maybe that's something we can work towards.

Josh

Quoting Sascha Meinrath <sascha at ucimc.org>:

 hi all,
 
 if michigan has a commercially hosted server with lots of bandwidth, i
 think we should go with that option.  the UCIMC is setting up a prototype
 community webserver and building a wireless network out from that, but
 it's probably not as stable a system as the michigan solution.  so i would
 suggest going with that option.
 
 can anyone think of a reason _not_ to go with the michigan site?
 
 --sascha
 
 ***
 
 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:02:18 +0000
 From: Ben Chodoroff <bc at sdf.lonestar.org>
 To: ski at indymedia.org
 Cc: imc-us-tech at ucimc.org
 Subject: Re: [IMC-US-tech] moving forward:
 
 I'm here too! I might've sent out my introduction too early.. it's
 archived though.
 
 Michigan's server is also capable of hosting. It's a commercial host,
 which means we have a lot of thoroughput available. It's ready to run
 more dada sites... It's also really really fast (multiple oc-3's).
 
 -ben
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 IMC-US-tech mailing list
 IMC-US-tech at lists.cu.groogroo.com
 http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us-tech