[IMC-US-Tech] Re: alaska / Tech Trouble
bradley at riseup.net
bradley at riseup.net
Sat Jan 7 17:51:58 CST 2006
Amy L. Dalton wrote:
> The article she refers to is here.
> http://indymedia.us/en/2006/01/13368.shtml
> Seems like a good one to promote to me.
I promoted this one, but now the formatting is all messed up.
I don't know what to do.
I can't seem to fix it using my version of firefox or safari.
Can someone please let me know if the wysiwyg editor is broken... or if
it is just me.
sincerely,
Bradley
- - - - -
Huge Open-pit Gold Mine Proposed in Alaska
http://indymedia.us/en/2006/01/13368.shtml
Northern Dynasty Mines, a Canadian company, is proposing to start
operations on what would be North America’s largest open pit gold and
copper mine, deep in the heart of pristine Alaskan wilderness. The
Pebble Mine site is located just south of Lake Clark National Park and
Preserve, 15 miles northwest of Lake Iliamna and some 250 miles south of
Anchorage. The Iliamna region is important to many Alaskan’s subsistence
lifestyle. It is home to one of the world’s only populations of
freshwater seals, the large Mulchatna caribou herd, and contains the
headwaters of Bristol Bay, with the largest runs of sockeye and Chinook
salmon in the world.
The Pebble Mine proposal includes the creation of a 20 square mile toxic
waste-storage lagoon, and the elimination of Frying Pan Lake, critical
for spawning salmon. Recent finds of high grade ore at the edge of the
mine site has led NDM to consider a second underground mine adjacent to
the main pit, which would be widened to 2 miles across. Mines such as
these can release arsenic, sulfuric acid, cyanide (NDM has already
rescinded an earlier promise not to use cyanide), and heavy metals
including lead and mercury. Hard rock mines are, in fact, the single
largest source of toxic spills and leakage in the U.S. Despite the
enormous presence of the oil and gas industries in Alaska, three out of
four of the largest illegal industrial spills in Alaska in 2003 were
caused by the mining industry.
Alaska already has its share of toxic mines. In 1990, zinc contamination
levels around the Red Dog zinc and lead mine in NW Alaska rose to levels
200 times higher than the standard. According to the EPA’s toxic release
inventory in 2002, Red Dog releases 481.6 million pounds of toxic
pollutants a year, the major contributor to Alaska’s total of 545.5
million pounds, more than any other state in the US. The current Pebble
proposal describes a mine with 20 times the ore output of Red Dog,
making the resulting pollution likely to be far worse.
One of the major issues surrounding the Pebble project is the remoteness
of location. Getting power to the mine would require either an over 200
mile (322 km) long power line slicing right through Lake Clark National
Park (a remote, roadless park), or one going 80 miles (129 km) to the
ocean, and then another roughly 40 miles (64.5 km) under the Cook Inlet
to the town of Homer. The construction of either option, as well as the
proposed 75 mile long private road, in such remote, previously untouched
areas will indubitably cause wide spread ecological damage, not only by
the immediate effects of development but also through increased
accessibility. The state, as usual, will pay for any development in the
area, including roads and power lines for the sole use of the mine,
effectively privatizing public land for the lifetime of the mine. Once
the infrastructure is in place for large mining operations such as a
road, mill and high-tension power lines, the mining of smaller
surrounding sites becomes more feasible. There are over 540 square miles
of land claimed by six different mining companies north of Lake Iliamna
that have the potential to be opened.
The region of the mine is also known for seismic activity. It is at the
base of Mt. Iliamna, an active volcano that continually plumes, and
earthquakes in the area are frequent, including a major one this spring.
Furthermore, two active volcanoes that have gone off multiple times in
the last 30 years flank Mt. Iliamna on both sides. Even waste ponds
recently constructed with ‘cutting edge’ technology have been known to
break open, causing widespread damage above and beyond the usual
leakage. The Baia Mare gold mine in Romania had a damn failure from
excess rainfall that resulted in the release of 130 cubic yards of mine
waste containing 75 tons cyanide, which killed 80% of the fish in the
Tisza River and disrupted the drinking water of 2.5 million people.
Putting such waste ponds in areas of intense seismic activity can only
increase the risk.
The mine would employ an estimated 2000 workers during construction
and1000 after it is opened. The small Native villages that do exist in
these remote regions rely on fish and caribou for food, and the mine
threatens to permanently destroy the delicate balance they have with
nature by increasing the population, which puts more stress on the food
resources, by driving away game with their operations, and by the
destruction of the entire local ecology with toxic leakages. Despite the
jobs promised (mostly labor), the mining industry is not usually
associated with prosperous communities across the nation for a number of
reasons. Metal commodity prices are unstable, causing instability in
employment and payroll, the life of a contemporary metal mine tends to
be relatively short, the labor needs of metal mining operations are
constantly falling as technological change displaces workers, and
environmental damage associated with metal mining discourages people and
business from locating near mining operations. The Red Dog Mine
mentioned above does employ a significant portion of the local Native
population, but in labor jobs with serious exposure to lead
contamination and other toxins. Higher paying jobs will be filled by
people brought in, probably from outside Alaska. The Nushagak river
villages of Kooliganek, New Stuyahok, Ekwok, Dillingham Village Council,
Lake and Pen villages, Nondalton Village Council, and Kokhanok Village
Council, have written resolutions opposing the mine development, though
there is a fair degree of local ambivalence. The laws to deal with
mining in Alaska (as with much of the nation) are outdated and
inadequate. Alaska’s major industries are all extractive, many very
environmentally damaging, and the government usually supports these
industries without hesitation. The states legislature’s recent votes on
mining issues have favored industry by a margin of 278-2. Recent
decisions have included allowing mining companies to dump tailings
directly into fresh water lakes. The state has financed $267 million
dollars of development for the Red Dog mine, $71 million in 1997 alone
to the Fort Knox Mine, and have approved to pay more than 25% of the
capital cost for the development of the Kensington Mine. This kind of
support makes Alaska a very attractive place for mining companies to
operate in. The EPA reports that mining has contaminated 40% of the
headwaters in the western US outside of Alaska, and, if we continue on
the same course, Alaska seems likely to join that statistic.
In the case of a toxic release, ND’s managements may not be affected by
attempts to hold them accountable. As Canadian citizens and residents,
certain of Northern Dynasty’s directors and officers may not be subject
themselves to U.S. legal proceedings, so that recovery on judgments
issued by U.S. courts may be difficult or impossible. Even though
Alaskans are largely supportive of mining activities, the problems with
the Pebble project are enough to make even most of them think twice. The
threat not only to the regions environment, but the subsistence
lifestyle of much of the state’s population through threatening the
Bristol Bay fisheries and caribou grounds widely used by nearby
population centers, has many people in opposition to the mine.
Unfortunately, politicians aren’t listening, and the governor has
already given his approval, as has the Lake and Peninsula Borough in
which the mine would be situated. Leaders in Alaska usually enjoy the
support of the public when they encourage extractive industries to set
up operations in the state, doing the will of the people and lining
their own pockets at the same time. But let Alaskans decide for once NOT
to let an Outside company rape our land, and we see the politicians show
their true colors. Mining, already the source of most of our pollution,
is not strongly regulated in the state, and allowing North America’s
biggest open pit mine to open up in the middle of pristine country and
crucial subsistence habitat is inviting catastrophe.
Most of the information here from:
http://www.bristolbayalliance.com
Alaska Department of Natural Resources on the mine:
http://www.dnr.state.ak.us/mlw/mining/largemine/pebble/
Northern Dynasty:
http://www.northerndynastyminerals.com/ndm/Home.asp
Pictures/maps/info:
http://www.aktrekking.com/pebble/index.html
http://skytruth.mediatools.org/objects/view.acs?object_id=5984
To get on the Pebble opposition list:
http://www.reformakmines.org/
More information about the IMC-US-Tech
mailing list