[Peace-discuss] US and Israel as occupiers

[C. G. Estabrook]

[A remarkable article by Gideon Levy in the Israeli paper Ha'aretz exposes
both countries' policies with a clarity absent from the US press.  --CGE]


Those who trample human rights in Israel are having a field day: Look at
the behavior of the Americans in Iraq, they say. Every time troops open
fire at a checkpoint, every killing of a civilian, every picture of siege
and plight, leads to merriment here. The United States, the cradle of
democracy, the leader of the free world, is behaving like us.

According to one report, "IDF officers find it difficult to stop smiling"
when they hear the reports of the war in Iraq. From now on, no one will be
able to criticize their conduct in the territories. The New York Times
reported that Israel even hastened to suggest that the United States learn
from its experience in the use of tanks, helicopters and bulldozers in the
center of cities and refugee camps.

Similar delight has also gripped those wishing to curb the media in
Israel: Look at how America is censoring the images of the war in its
media - no coffins and no prisoners, how the media has volunteered
enthusiastically to enlist in the war effort. And how they fired the
courageous reporter Peter Arnett, without so much as batting an eyelash,
for expressing his opinions on enemy television.

This keeping in line with the behavior of the United States is another
case of the collateral damage of this base war. America is not an example
for anything. Even before going to war, there was no way it could serve as
a role model, and going to this unjustified war in Iraq has deprived it
completely of the right to serve as a light unto the nations and the Jews
in upholding freedom, morality and human rights.

So let us not be quick to conclude that what America is allowed to do, we
are allowed to do, too. Neither they nor we have the right to kill
needlessly, to harm and humiliate civilians, deprive them of their
freedom, starve them, take away their livelihood and trample on their
sovereignty, or to recruit the media for the war effort.

America, which is fighting an illegal war, is an occupier in every
respect.

Long before the first Iraqi civilian was shot at a checkpoint, the United
States was in no position to take pride in all its deeds, either at home
or externally. Not all its citizens benefit from the fact that it is a
large democracy.

For example, in the past 29 years, 816 people have been executed in the
United States, as in the darkest of regimes, with a clear bias against the
blacks. Studies show a black murderer is 11 times more likely to be
executed than a white person convicted of the same crime. More than
one-fifth of the children in the country that is supposed to be the leader
of the free world live below the poverty line, and 41 million Americans,
among them 8.5 million children, do not have any form of medical
insurance. Is that the definition of a just society? Some 3.5 million
Americans are registered as homeless, though the real number is estimated
to be twice that many.

A country that launches a war at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars
when it lacks the ability to care for millions of homeless people and poor
children cannot consider itself enlightened or a liberator.

Outside its borders, the United States cannot always serve as a moral
model, either. Hundreds of thousands of people, including many civilians,
have been killed and murdered in the wars and military campaigns it has
launched since World War II - such as in Vietnam, Cambodia and elsewhere -
and in the murderous regimes the United States has brought to power or
assisted.

However, even if the United States had been a beacon of justice, its
decision to go to war in Iraq and turn its army into an occupying force
deprives it of the right to be considered a paragon. To the remarks of
journalist Thomas Friedman (in an interview to Ari Shavit in Haaretz
Magazine over the weekend), to the effect that the American democracy
becomes aggressive when threatened, we should add that democracies cease
to be such when they become occupiers. France, Belgium, Britain, the
United States and Israel, all of them enlightened democracies, lost the
justness of their cause when they became occupying powers. That is
inevitable.

As soon as the United States starts to become mired in the occupation,
today's enlightened soldiers will become tomorrow's inhuman troops. They
will lose the remnants of their moral image and will kill, destroy and
abuse. The children huggers will become the children persecutors, the food
distributors will turn into agents of starvation, the wound healers will
block ambulances at checkpoints, the liberators will become jailers.
Humiliating the occupied and stripping them of their rights will become
the norm. The liberated Iraqi people will pay in the form of heavy losses,
hunger and humiliation, even if these are temporary. And they will not
forget. That is the impact of occupation, whether in the narrow alleys of
a Gaza Strip refugee camp or in the sprawling city of Baghdad.

If there is one lesson Israel can impart to the Americans, it is that
every occupation is appalling, that it tramples the occupied and corrupts
the occupier. If the Americans pause for a moment to see what is going on
in the Tul Karm refugee camp and in the casbah of Nablus, they will see
what they will soon become. And if Israelis look at what is happening in
Iraq, perhaps they will understand that it is not the Palestinians but,
above all, we who have created the present situation.

An occupier is an occupier, whether he comes from a democracy that is two-
and-a-quarter centuries old or from "the only democracy in the Middle
East."

  ==============================================================
  C. G. Estabrook, Ph.D., Visiting Scholar
  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [MC-190]
  109 Observatory, 901 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana IL 61801 USA
  office: 217.244.4105 mobile: 217.369.5471 home: 217.359.9466
  <www.carlforcongress.org>
  ===============================================================