[Peace-discuss] Fwd: what if you're wrong?

[Dlind49 at aol.com]

Ron: How do you deal with fact that Iraq would not possess weapons of mass 
destruction if the U.S. Department of Defense  officials did not give them to 
Iraq in the first place?  What do you do with fact that U.S. officials have 
and still do use weapons of mass destructon under Project Shad against U.S. 
citizens?  How do reconcile U.S. use of uranium munitions, refusals to 
provide medical care, and refusals to clean up the environment?  Who do we 
attack next because they possess weapons of mass destruction?  How do you 
justify a preemptive attack in direct violation of the LAW OF LAND WARFARE?   
How do you justify that DOD officials have sent our troops into harms way 
with defective gas masks, defective  chemical protective suits, inadeqaute 
combat training, and a broken Department of Veterans Affairs and Department 
of Defense medical system that cannot provide medical care for over 221000 
Gulf War I VA confirmed disabled combat veterans much less any one else or 
any more combat casualties ? What specific evidence is there that Iraq even 
possesses WMD's today when the UN inspectors have not found any?   Why do we 
need to lead the attack when we are not at risk nor under actual threat of 
attack? How do you justify the seriuss adverse health and environmental  
consequences caused by U.S. combat actions during and since Gulf War I? 
Should the U.S.  military or some other country launch attacks against all of 
the U.S. domestic terrorist groups and cells that have used chemical, 
biological, radiological munitions and exposives against U.S. citizens within 
the U.S.? If Iraq was proven by UN inspectors to possess WMD's how can you 
justify using military attacks and explosives to destroy these stockpiles 
when neutralization or incineration is the only safe way to dispose of them?  

What are your responses to my questions? 

doug