[Peace-discuss] Fw: underwriting spot

[Sylvie L]

Recently, while having lunch in a local eatiery here, I overheard someone 
say that Bush was the first president to work for Peace since Carter.....

I nearly choked on my coffee.....


I sincerely hope WILL will indeed change it's mind-  ADM underwrites ALOT of 
stuff, we seem them here too....

Best to everyone there, I look forward to being home and meeting all of you-
I personally am praying on this day of the Harmonic Concordance that we 
really will reach an enlightened time of peace...

Namaste~
S-




>From: "jencart" <jencart at mycidco.com>
>To: c-bee1 at uiuc.edu, peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>Subject: Re:Re: [Peace-discuss] Fw: underwriting spot
>Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 09:01:15 EDT
>
>Yup, I said since Bush and Sharon define themselves as men of peace, how 
>could peace and justice be considered controversial???  Jenifer
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Morton K. Brussel wrote:
>
> > What WILL seems to be saying is that AWARE is controversial (like the
> > NRA), and it doesn't like controversy (however that is defined!). Of
> > course WILL's stance is hypocritical--it simply wants to cover its
> > rear end, belying its public interest ideals.
> >
> > MKB
>
>
>     For WILL to be hypocritical in this case, wouldn't they have to be  
>accepting those NRA submissions?  Come to think of it, I don't think  I've 
>ever heard an underwriting announcement with political  ramifications on 
>WILL at all.  And while we may not see political  ramifications per se in 
>peace and justice, remember that the Republican  party and the corporate 
>media have been working overtime for over a year  to make it so in the eyes 
>of the average American.
>
>     If WILL ever does actually start taking controversial underwriting,  I 
>wonder which side can afford more of it.  Something to think about..?
>
>     I think WILL is covering its rear end a little too vigorously here,  
>but having worked alongside Les and Debbie for years I can pretty well  
>guess that it's not because they want to.  I think I'll wait for those  NRA 
>blurbs before I start accusing them of hypocrisy - these days,  covering 
>one's rear end can be a crucial component of pursuing one's  public 
>interest ideals.   -cmb
>
>_______________________________________________ Peace-discuss mailing list
>Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
>_______________________________________________
>Peace-discuss mailing list
>Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger with backgrounds, emoticons and more. 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_customize