[Peace-discuss] Flag flap
Alfred Kagan
akagan at uiuc.edu
Mon Nov 10 15:07:44 CST 2003
I don't think I can explain it any more. Perhaps someone else would
like to take this on?
At 2:59 PM -0600 11/10/03, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>You insist that Dean and Clinton are racists. What can that mean? Neither
>holds conscious contempt for others, based on skin color. You say their
>racism is "unconscious." Do you mean something like the Freudian sense in
>which all men are parricides? I would think that our real political
>problems are things like the objectively racist polices of the Clinton
>administration, and they are related to the class issues that Dean's
>comment adumbrated. --CGE
>
>
>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Alfred Kagan wrote:
>
>> Carl,
>>
>> The crux of the issue is when you write that "-- of course neither is
>> a racist in any serious sense." Here is where we have a fundamental
>> disagreement. We can easily see the small numbers of people like
>> Matt Hales and KKK followers, but it is harder to see the huge
>> numbers of people who are basically quiet about their racism. Many
>> folks genuinely believe they are not racists and can't understand why
>> they get involved in such issues. Here are think Dean is a perfect
>> example. It is the deep racism within the structure and ethos of
>> society that is much more important and serious than the KKK variety.
>>
>>
>>
>> At 2:10 PM -0600 11/10/03, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>> >So, you're saying that, since "most white Americans are socialized to be
>> >racists," Dean and Clinton are both "unconscious racists"?
>> >
>> >I doubt there's much to choose between the personal attitudes of the two
>> >-- of course neither is a racist in any serious sense. But the Clinton
>> >administration's policies were objectively racist, in that they treated
>> >inequably groups that can be described by color -- e.g., on welfare
>> >reform, incarceration, drug laws. It's true that the discrimination did
>> >not usually arise because of color (rather class), but there were many
>> >more black women in prison at the end of the Clinton administration than
>> >at the beginning; altho' whites and blacks were using drugs at roughly the
>> >same rate, those imprisoned for drugs in the 90s were overwhelmingly
>> >black; and altho' there are many more poor white people than poor black
>> >people in the US, a larger proportion of blacks were injured by Clinton's
>> >revocation of the New Deal in regard to welfare.
>> >
>> >Under those circumstances, blacks rallying to Clinton were as misguided as
>> >feminists who did so -- and on matters of gender, his objectionable
>> >personal attitudes were hardly in doubt (and accusations of rape never
>> >resolved).
>> >
>> >But it's straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel to suggest that Dean
>> >has slipped and said a Bad Word while ignoring that he was actually
>> >nodding at -- the sort of reforms (opposed by the Clinton administration)
>> >that are necessary:
>> >
>> >"White folks in the South who drive pickup trucks with Confederate flag
>> >decals on the back ought to be voting with us because their kids don't
>> >have health insurance either, and their kids need better schools too."
>> >
>> >(I do admit that it's probably only campaign rhetoric on Dean's part.)
>> >
>> >--CGE
>> >
>> >
>> >On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Alfred Kagan wrote:
>> >
>> >> Most white Americans are socialized to be racists. We have to work to
>> >> get rid of the racism we learn as we grow up. Many African-Americans
>> >> seem to have related well to Clinton. Perhaps he learned more about
>> >> racism than some of his peers, and perhaps people picked up on that.
>> >> But Clinton often showed promise on issues. Unfortunately he rarely
>> >> fulfilled the promise.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >Would you say Bill Clinton was an "unconscious racist," too?
>>That sounds
>> >> >to me like the sort of "thought-crime" described in 1984.
>> >> >
>> >> >Dean was not embracing the Confederate flag. He was awkwardly and
>> >> >jocularly describing a type, with a description he'd used
>>before. And he
> > >> >was asserting his wish to attract people of this type to vote for him
>> >> >rather than for Republicans by (he wouldn't say this) social democratic
>> >> >policies.
>> >> >
>> >> >You don't seem to have posted your comment to the list. Do
>>you mean it to
>> >> >remain private? --CGE
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Alfred Kagan wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Trying to cut through this debate is difficult. We are not
>> >> >> communicating very well. Dean is not an overt racist, but he is an
>> >> >> unconscious racist. He may want to overcome this but he has not
>> >> >> succeeded. Black people can see this for what it is. AWARE needs to
>> >> >> understand this dynamic.
>> >> > >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Al Kagan
>> >> African Studies Bibliographer and Professor of Library Administration
>> >> Africana Unit, Room 328
>> >> University of Illinois Library
>> > > 1408 W. Gregory Drive
>> >> Urbana, IL 61801, USA
>> >>
>> >> tel. 217-333-6519
>> >> fax. 217-333-2214
>> >> e-mail. akagan at uiuc.edu
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Peace-discuss mailing list
>> >> Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>> >> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Al Kagan
>> African Studies Bibliographer and Professor of Library Administration
>> Africana Unit, Room 328
>> University of Illinois Library
>> 1408 W. Gregory Drive
>> Urbana, IL 61801, USA
>>
>> tel. 217-333-6519
>> fax. 217-333-2214
>> e-mail. akagan at uiuc.edu
>>
--
Al Kagan
African Studies Bibliographer and Professor of Library Administration
Africana Unit, Room 328
University of Illinois Library
1408 W. Gregory Drive
Urbana, IL 61801, USA
tel. 217-333-6519
fax. 217-333-2214
e-mail. akagan at uiuc.edu
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list