[Peace-discuss] FWD: Vote Fraud as Fundraiser

[C. G. Estabrook]

So the Cobb campaign is, as their enemies charged, working for the
Democrats?  To raise and spend moneys comparable to those used in their 
campaign on the improbable possibility of redirecting Ohio's vote to the
Democrats -- which the Democrats are unwilling to spend their considerably
greater funds on -- seems at best quixotic.  It's not a serious threat to
the administration and its policies.  Cui bono?  --CGE
 

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Morton K.Brussel wrote:

> Because, Carl, maybe someone should do, perhaps principled Greens, it
> the Democrats will not. If, as is conceivable (even if improbable), a
> recount revealed a turn around in the vote, that would have quite
> significant repercussions, which Cobb et al would favor.  mkb
> 
> On Dec 10, 2004, at 4:48 PM, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
> 
> > The problem, Jen, is that a central question that Frank raises remains
> > unanswered: Why is Cobb raising and spending money for a recount in a
> > state where the Greens weren't on the ballot and collected a total of 
> > 186 votes?  --CGE
> >