[Peace-discuss] 9/11 film actions

[Morton K.Brussel]

I wasn't present at the discussion, but it strikes me that if AWARE 
greatly favors one candidate over another, it should try to help that 
candidate. This does not mean that AWARE "endorses" all the positions 
of that candidate.

This seems applicable to the case of Gill vs. Johnson.

Let's not be afraid that we will compromise ourselves in supporting a 
Democrat.

These are critical times. We should have Gill materials on the AWARE 
table.

MKB


On Jun 16, 2004, at 4:48 PM, Richard Frazin wrote:

>
>
> There does seem to be a consensus  that
> the Gill campaign effort is generally consisent with the goals of our 
> group
> (as far as I know, there are no AWARE members that prefer Tim Johnson 
> to David Gill).
> Sunday's discussion was about official endorsements (including that of 
> Gill), and there
> was no consensus on that.   Presenting
> both Gill materials and AWARE materials at the table is not the same 
> as an official
> endorsement, and I would like to see how many of us support this idea.
>
> Rich
>
>
> ---- Original message ----
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:55:09 -0500
>> From: Alfred Kagan <akagan at uiuc.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] 9/11 film actions
>> To: frazin at uiuc.edu, peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>>
>> We discussed this topic at the last meeting. There is no consensus
>> about supporting Dr. Gill.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>