[Peace-discuss] 9/11 film actions

[C. G. Estabrook]

If you'll forgive the expression, amen.


On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Morton K.Brussel wrote:

> I wasn't present at the discussion, but it strikes me that if AWARE
> greatly favors one candidate over another, it should try to help that
> candidate. This does not mean that AWARE "endorses" all the positions
> of that candidate.
> 
> This seems applicable to the case of Gill vs. Johnson.
> 
> Let's not be afraid that we will compromise ourselves in supporting a
> Democrat.
> 
> These are critical times. We should have Gill materials on the AWARE
> table.
> 
> MKB
> 
> On Jun 16, 2004, at 4:48 PM, Richard Frazin wrote:
> 
> >
> > There does seem to be a consensus  that
> > the Gill campaign effort is generally consisent with the goals of our 
> > group
> > (as far as I know, there are no AWARE members that prefer Tim Johnson 
> > to David Gill).
> > Sunday's discussion was about official endorsements (including that of 
> > Gill), and there
> > was no consensus on that.   Presenting
> > both Gill materials and AWARE materials at the table is not the same 
> > as an official
> > endorsement, and I would like to see how many of us support this idea.
> >
> > Rich
> >