[Peace-discuss] US censorship

[C. G. Estabrook]

[I opposed the misnamed "campaign finance reform act" (McCain-Feingold) in
print and on the air when I ran for Congress, apparently to some liberal
dismay.  Here's an example of what it's brought us. --CGE]

	June 24, 2004
	"Fahrenheit 9/11" ban?
	Ads for Moore's movie could be stopped on July 30
	By Alexander Bolton

Michael Moore may be prevented from advertising his controversial new
movie, “Fahrenheit 9/11,” on television or radio after July 30 if the
Federal Election Commission (FEC) today accepts the legal advice of its
general counsel.

At the same time, a Republican-allied 527 soft-money group is preparing to
file a complaint against Moore’s film with the FEC for violating
campaign-finance law.

In a draft advisory opinion placed on the FEC’s agenda for today’s
meeting, the agency’s general counsel states that political documentary
filmmakers may not air television or radio ads referring to federal
candidates within 30 days of a primary election or 60 days of a general
election.
	
steve finn/Getty images Michael Moore

The opinion is generated under the new McCain-Feingold campaign-finance
law, which prohibits corporate-funded ads that identify a federal
candidate before a primary or general election.

The proscription is broadly defined. Section 100.29 of the federal
election regulations defines restricted corporate-funded ads as those that
identify a candidate by his “name, nickname, photograph or drawing” or
make it “otherwise apparent through an unambiguous reference.”

Should the six members of the FEC vote to approve the counsel’s opinion,
it could put a serious crimp on Moore’s promotion efforts. The flavor of
the movie was encapsulated by a recent review in The Boston Globe as
“the case against George W. Bush, a fat compendium of previously
reported crimes, errors, sins, and grievances delivered in the
director’s patented tone of vaudevillian social outrage.”

The FEC ruling may also affect promotion of a slew of other upcoming
political documentaries and films, such as “Uncovered: The Whole Truth
About the Iraq War,” which opens in August, “The Corporation,” about
democratic institutions being subsumed by the corporate agenda, or
“Silver City,” a recently finished film by John Sayles that criticizes
the Bush administration.

Another film, “The Hunting of the President,” which investigates
whether Bill Clinton was the victim of a vast conspiracy, could be subject
to regulations if it mentions Bush or members of Congress in its ads.

Since the FEC considers the Republican presidential convention scheduled
to begin Aug. 30 a national political primary in which Bush is a
candidate, Moore and other politically oriented filmmakers could not air
any ad mentioning Bush after July 30. That could make advertising for the
film after July difficult since it is all about the Bush administration
and what Moore regards as its mishandling of the war on terrorism and the
decision to invade Iraq.

After the convention, ads for political films that mention Bush or any
other federal candidate would be subject to the restrictions on all
corporate communications within 60 days of the Nov. 2 general election.

“Fahrenheit 9/11” opens nationally tomorrow.

The film’s distributor, Lions Gate Films, an incorporated organization,
would almost certainly pay for its broadcast promotions.

David Bossie, the president of Citizens United, plans to allege that
“Fahrenheit 9/11” violates federal election law, arguing that “Moore
has publicly indicated his goal is to impact this election season.”

Bossie had planned to file a complaint with the FEC yesterday but
postponed action because his lawyers want to review it at the last minute,
said Summer Stitz, a spokeswoman for Bossie’s group.

“I don’t think much of Michael Moore or his two-hour political
advertisement — that’s all it is,” Bossie said. “He uses all of
these words to make it look like he makes documentaries, but it’s the
furthest thing from the truth. Documentaries tend to be fact-based.”

Sarah Greenberg, a spokeswoman for Lions Gate Films who is serving as
Moore’s spokeswoman, did not return a call for comment.

The FEC counsel’s draft advisory opinion responded to a request for
guidance from David Hardy, a documentary film producer with the Bill of
Rights Educational Foundation. Hardy asked whether he could air broadcast
ads that refer to congressional officeholders who appear in his
documentary.

At issue in the FEC’s opinion is whether documentary films qualify for a
“media exemption,” which allows members of the press to discuss
political candidates freely in the days before an election.

In its opinion, the general counsel wrote, “In McConnell vs. FEC …
(2003) the [Supreme] Court described the media exemption as ‘narrow’
and drew a distinction between ‘corporations that are part of the media
industry’ as opposed to ‘other corporations that are not involved in
the regular business of imparting news to the public.’”

“The radio and television commercials that you describe in your request
would be electioneering communications,” the counsel concluded. “The
proposed commercials would refer to at least one presidential candidate.
… They would also be publicly distributed because you intend to pay a
radio station and perhaps a television station to air or broadcast your
commercials. … Finally, they would reach 50,000 people within 30 days of
a national nominating convention and or the general election.”

However, one commissioner, Michael Toner, has a different view of what
restrictions may be placed on political films.

“I think there’s evidence that when Congress created the press
exemption they intended for it to cover media in all its forms,” said
Toner. “If a documentary produced by an independent company would be
subject to restriction or, equally important, if efforts to promote the
documentary would be subject to restriction, I think that is very
problematic.”
	

© 2004 The Hill 733 Fifteenth Street, NW Suite 1140 Washington, DC 20005
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax