[Peace-discuss] A vote for Kerry is a vote for Bush!

[Morton K.Brussel]

Vive l'apocalypse!

MKB

On May 3, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Phil Stinard wrote:

> Let me try to put this politely, so that I don't insult anyone's 
> intelligence.  Kerry has positions as strong as, or more reactionary 
> than, Bush on the issues of Israel, Iraq, and Latin America, the three 
> biggest hotspots (that we know of, of course).  Those are just is 
> public positions on three issues,  God only knows what his private 
> views are, or how he feels on other issues of foreign policy.  Kerry's 
> views are simply not acceptable any more than Bush's are.  And don't 
> try to tell me that he is pandering for right-wing votes.  He's 
> already lost those.  Unless Bush implodes, Kerry will lose this fall, 
> and I say good riddance!  Maybe that will clear the slate for a more 
> progressive Democratic candidate four years from now.  No matter who 
> wins this fall, Bush or Kerry, the Empire will still be in the 
> business of trying to dominate world economies and committing genocide 
> to get rid of the undesirables who have insufficient purchasing power. 
>  If I voted for Kerry and he won, how could I live with myself knowing 
> that I helped elect someone who will undoubtedly be responsible for 
> the slaughter or "benign neglect" leading to the death of millions?  
> Only by consistently showinig a preference for a third party, for a 
> more progressive candidate, for a better way, will things ever change 
> through the democratic process.  I seriously doubt that things will 
> change through the democratic process, though.  It's far more likely 
> that the Empire will sink under its own bloat and decadence after 
> making an enemy of the entire world.  A Democratic Party regime would 
> only prolong the inevitable.
>
> I wonder how much money the Bush campaign is paying the Kerry stooges 
> to pander to the Empire?
>
> --Phil
>
>
>
>
>> From: Chuck Minne <mincam2 at yahoo.com>
>> Subject: ELECT BUSH,	VOTE FOR NADER! - WAS Re: [Peace-discuss] No one
>> 	is immune from	criticism, not even Chomsky
>> To: Peace <peace-discuss at lists.groogroo.com>
>> Message-ID: <20040503121802.3574.qmail at web20805.mail.yahoo.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>>
>>
>> Phil Stinard <pstinard at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Chuck,
>> ..... I don't buy the
>> "a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush" attitude that is rather 
>> arrogantly
>> thrust upon the more thoughtful voter. It's condescending, and an 
>> insult to
>> one's intelligence.
>>
>> Chuck responds:
>>
>> But in the real world, its true; and if the truth is condescending 
>> and insulting, so be it. If he could, Bush would send you a check to 
>> vote for Nader.
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! 
> http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>